Expert opinion on drug safety
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · May 2020
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyRisk of adverse events in lymphoma patients treated with brentuximab vedotin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objectives: To assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) associated with brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients. Methods: Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials Databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing brentuximab vedotin with non-brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients. Results: A total of 2225 patients from 4 RCTs were included. ⋯ The brentuximab vedotin group significantly increased the risk of all-grade peripheral sensory neuropathy (RR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.23-4.26), pyrexia (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), nausea (RR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.18), vomiting (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08-2.19), diarrhea (RR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.44-1.98), and alopecia (RR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39), respectively. The brentuximab vedotin group significantly increased the risk of high-grade sensory neuropathy (RR 4.79, 95% CI: 1.46-15.75), neutropenia (RR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01-2.18), nausea (RR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.37-5.12), vomiting (RR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.17-4.12), and diarrhea (RR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.21-2.85). Conclusion: Brentuximab vedotin increased the risk of certain AEs in lymphoma patients.
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · May 2020
ReviewA comprehensive overview and safety evaluation of fremanezumab as a preventive therapy for migraine.
Introduction: Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb), is a migraine-specific treatment for migraine prevention. Areas covered: This review will briefly discuss other available and emerging CGRP mAbs and the neurophysiology of fremanezumab. The review will focus on phase III trials of the efficacy of fremanezumab for episodic and chronic migraine, and a recent pooled safety and tolerability analysis of its use. Expert opinion: Continued efficacy and safety data collection will help guide long-term risk and efficacy counseling in the general population.
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · Apr 2020
Review Comparative StudyAre biosimilars approved for use in psoriasis safe enough to replace leading biologic therapies? A review.
Introduction: Many tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha 'biosimilar' agents have been approved for the treatment of psoriasis and other autoinflammatory conditions. These biosimilars have the same structure as the originator biologic and have been shown to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy. However, given the method by which biosimilars are manufactured, they are not exact replicas of the originator, unlike generic forms of non-biologic medications. ⋯ Studies in patients with psoriasis are more limited. Transitioning from a biologic to its biosimilar has also been shown to be similarly safe and immunogenetic compared to maintenance therapy with the originator. More post-marketing studies are needed to demonstrate the long-term safety in patients with psoriasis.
-
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with a wide spectrum of neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including meningo-encephalitis, myasthenia gravis and various neuropathies. Although relatively rare, they often present significant diagnostic complexity and may be under-recognized. Permanent neurologic deficits and/or fatality have been described but improvement is noted in most cases with ICI discontinuation and immunosuppressive therapy. ⋯ Various immunobiologic triggers have been proposed to explain why certain patients might develop neurologic irAEs and are also briefly discussed. Expert opinion: All providers who care for patients with cancer should be made aware of common neurologic irAEs and able to recognize when prompt evaluation and consultation with appropriate specialists are indicated. Symptoms suggestive of encephalitis, myasthenia-gravis or an acute polyradiculopathy such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) in patients exposed to these agents warrant immediate attention with a low threshold for hospitalization to expedite work-up and monitor for severe and/or life-threatening manifestations.
-
Introduction: Lacosamide has been used in epilepsy patients in the United States, Europe and Asia since it was approved by the FDA in 2008. Many patients have benefited from this drug as a new generation of sodium channel blocker. With the worldwide use of this drug, its adverse effects have gradually emerged, especially some rare adverse events. ⋯ Expert opinion: In more than 10 years of experience in drug usage, adverse reactions of lacosamide have also been gradually discovered. The review showed that lacosamide is safe and effective in antiepileptic treatment, and its common side effects are dizziness, headache, drowsiness, diplopia, and cardiovascular abnormalities. Skin rashes, hematotoxicity and heart damage, psychological symptoms and suicide risk have also been reported and emphasized.