Expert opinion on drug safety
-
Benzodiazepines are the most frequently prescribed antianxiety drugs in the elderly. Despite their usefulness and safety in the younger population, there is concern about the rationale for their use in the elderly. Studies of the therapeutic use of benzodiazepines in the elderly are rare. ⋯ Significant adverse effects that may be associated with benzodiazepine use in the elderly include falls, cognitive impairment, sedation, and impairment of driving skills, all of which are particularly related to the long half-life of benzodiazepines. Long-term use of benzodiazepines should be discouraged because of the risk of dependence, which is a serious problem in the elderly. Unrecognised and untreated benzodiazepine dependence can lead to serious medical complications.
-
Urticaria is characterised by transient swellings of the skin, which fluctuate over hours. Deeper swellings of the subcutaneous and submucosal tissue are known as angio-oedema. Drug-induced urticaria has been reported with a wide range of drugs and vaccines. ⋯ Spontaneous reports of drug-induced urticaria to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, UK, over a 40-year period also implicate bupropion, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor antidepressants, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), H2 and H1 antihistamines, and systemic antifungals. New evidence suggests that selective COX-2 inhibitors may be tolerated in patients with aspirin-sensitive urticaria. The safety of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in patients with angio-oedema induced by ACEI has not yet been established.
-
By the year 2000, droperidol had become a standard drug for the treatment of behavioural emergencies in both psychiatric and medical settings. In 2001, the US FDA issued a 'black box' warning, citing cases of QT prolongation and/or torsades de pointes. As a result, the use of droperidol has been sharply circumscribed. ⋯ The authors conclude that, while in theory droperidol may prolong the QT interval to an extent similar to thioridazine, its long history of clinical use has shown no pattern of sudden deaths analogous to those that provoked the FDA warning. Although the numbers presented by the FDA initially appear alarming, after further evaluation it is clear that more definitive studies should have been carried out. Droperidol is safe, extremely effective, and now underused as a treatment for severely agitated or violent patients.
-
The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 is overexpressed in approximately 20-25% of human breast cancers and is an independent adverse prognostic factor. Targeted therapy directed against this receptor has been developed in the form of a humanised monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab. This antibody has shown activity as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer both prior to chemotherapy and in heavily pretreated patients. ⋯ Some patients may experience fever, chills, dyspnoea and pain, particularly with the first administration. Unexpectedly, cardiac toxicity has developed in some patients treated with trastuzumab, and this has a higher incidence in those treated in combination with an anthracycline. 'Cross-talk' between the oestrogen receptor and HER2 pathway has stimulated interest in using trastuzumab in combination with endocrine therapy. Current clinical trials are investigating the role of this agent in the adjuvant setting.
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · May 2004
ReviewRisk-benefit of antiemetics in prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
The development of effective antiemetic prophylaxis is one of the most significant steps forward in the area of supportive care. Fifteen years ago, patients receiving chemotherapy had to face the fact that nausea and vomiting were inevitable adverse effects, which could only be partially prevented by treatment with antiemetics such as dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids. The first group of drugs specifically developed as antiemetics was the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT](3)) receptor antagonists. ⋯ Guidelines are useful tools in the optimisation of antiemetic prophylaxis but, unfortunately, implementation of the evidence-based recommendations is far from successful. A prerequisite for further optimisation of antiemetic prophylaxis is updating of the guidelines, including recommendations for the use of NK 1 receptor antagonists (aprepitant), followed by implementation of these recommendations in the clinic. Future research must include 'the difficult trials' focusing on the remaining groups of patients with severe chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, including patients with refractory and breakthrough emesis.