Annals of family medicine
-
Annals of family medicine · Jan 2009
Multicenter StudyPostpartum depression screening at well-child visits: validity of a 2-question screen and the PHQ-9.
Postpartum depression affects up to 22% of women who have recently given birth. Most mothers are not screened for this condition, and an ideal screening tool has not been identified. This study investigated (1) the validity of a 2-question screen and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for identifying postpartum depression and (2) the feasibility of screening for postpartum depression during well-child visits. ⋯ The 2-question screen was highly sensitive and the PHQ-9 was highly specific for identifying postpartum depression. These results suggest the value of a 2-stage procedure for screening for postpartum depression, whereby a 2-question screen that is positive for depression is followed by a PHQ-9. These screens can be easily administered in primary care clinics; feasibility of screening during well-child visits was moderate but may be better in clinics using a mass-screening approach.
-
Annals of family medicine · Jan 2009
Intimate partner violence and comorbid mental health conditions among urban male patients.
We wanted to explore the associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) and comorbid health conditions, which have received little attention in male patients. ⋯ A cumulative risk of poor mental health and adverse health behaviors was associated with IPV disclosures. Self-disclosure by men seeking acute health care provides the potential for developing tools to assess level of risk and to guide tailored interventions and referrals based on the sex of the patient.
-
Annals of family medicine · Jan 2009
Screening questions to predict limited health literacy: a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes mellitus.
Limited health literacy is increasingly recognized as a barrier to receiving adequate health care. Identifying patients at risk of poor health outcomes secondary to limited health literacy is currently the responsibility of clinicians. Our objective was to identify which screening questions and demographics independently predict limited health literacy and could thus help clinicians individualize their patient education. ⋯ Self-rated reading ability, SILS result, highest education level attained, sex, and race independently predict whether a patient has limited health literacy. Clinicians should be aware of these associations and ask questions to identify patients at risk. We propose an "SOS" mnemonic based on these findings to help clinicians wishing to individualize patient education.