Annals of family medicine
-
Annals of family medicine · Mar 2013
Randomized Controlled TrialOsteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
We studied the efficacy of osteopathic manual treatment (OMT) and ultrasound therapy (UST) for chronic low back pain. ⋯ The OMT regimen met or exceeded the Cochrane Back Review Group criterion for a medium effect size in relieving chronic low back pain. It was safe, parsimonious, and well accepted by patients.
-
Annals of family medicine · Mar 2013
Randomized Controlled TrialImpact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
Peer health coaches offer a potential model for extending the capacity of primary care practices to provide self-management support for patients with diabetes. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether clinic-based peer health coaching, compared with usual care, improves glycemic control for low-income patients who have poorly controlled diabetes. ⋯ Peer health coaching significantly improved diabetes control in this group of low-income primary care patients.
-
Annals of family medicine · Mar 2013
Should authors submit previous peer-review reports when submitting research papers? Views of general medical journal editors.
Publishing research can be time consuming, as papers are often submitted and reviewed by multiple journals before final acceptance. We hypothesized that attaching previous peer-review reports to the next submission of the paper to a different journal (possibly with point-to-point responses and amendments) could decrease the workload for both reviewers and editors and could shorten the time from final draft to actual publication. We therefore performed an online survey to assess the views of the editors-in-chief of all 100 general medical journals from the citation impact factor report category "internal & general medicine" (ISI Web of Knowledge). ⋯ One of 4 journals do currently receive peer-review reports on occasion. Editors recognized potential advantages but also concerns on using previous peer-review reports across 3 themes: scientific community, quality of papers, and the publication process. The use of previous peer-review reports has the potential to facilitate authors, reviewers, and editors in optimizing peer review in general medical science.