Annals of family medicine
-
Annals of family medicine · Nov 2005
Randomized Controlled TrialPhysicians answer more clinical questions and change clinical decisions more often with synthesized evidence: a randomized trial in primary care.
Clinicians need evidence in a format that rapidly answers their questions. DynaMed is a database of synthesized evidence. We investigated whether primary care clinicians would answer more clinical questions, change clinical decision making, and alter search time using DynaMed in addition to their usual information sources. ⋯ Using DynaMed, primary care clinicians answered more questions and changed clinical decisions more often, without increasing overall search time. Synthesizing results of systematic evidence surveillance is a feasible method for meeting clinical information needs in primary care.
-
Annals of family medicine · Nov 2005
Quality of work life of independent vs employed family physicians in Wisconsin: a WReN study.
Family physicians in Wisconsin who are mainly employed by large health care organizations have voiced concerns regarding the quality of their work lives. We explored the quality of work life and its relationship to employment by health care organizations. ⋯ Independent physicians have significantly more positive ratings of several aspects of the quality of their work life compared with physicians employed by health care organizations. Health care organizations need to address these issues if they are to have a satisfied and stable workforce.
-
Annals of family medicine · Nov 2005
Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.
Current health literacy screening instruments for health care settings are either too long for routine use or available only in English. Our objective was to develop a quick and accurate screening test for limited literacy available in English and Spanish. ⋯ NVS is suitable for use as a quick screening test for limited literacy in primary health care settings.
-
Annals of family medicine · Nov 2005
Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room.
Contrary to physicians' concerns that face-to-face patient time is decreasing, data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) indicate that between 1988 and 1998, durations of primary care outpatient visits have increased. This study documented how physicians spend time during the workday, including time outside the examination room, and compared observed face-to-face patient care time with that reported in NAMCS. ⋯ Nearly one half of a primary care physician's workday is spent on activities outside the examination room, predominately focused on follow-up and documentation of care for patients not physically present. National estimates of visit duration overestimate the combination of face-to-face time and time spent on visit-specific work outside the examination room by 41%.
-
Annals of family medicine · Nov 2005
The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered.
Society invests billions of dollars in the development of new drugs and technologies but comparatively little in the fidelity of health care, that is, improving systems to ensure the delivery of care to all patients in need. Using mathematical arguments and a nomogram, we demonstrate that technological advances must yield dramatic, often unrealistic increases in efficacy to do more good than could be accomplished by improving fidelity. ⋯ The misalignment of priorities is driven partly by the commercial interests of industry and by the public's appetite for technological breakthroughs, but health outcomes ultimately suffer. Health, economic, and moral arguments make the case for spending less on technological advances and more on improving systems for delivering care.