Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA
-
Emerg Med Australas · Oct 2013
Level of agreement between prehospital and emergency department vital signs in trauma patients.
Describe the level of agreement between prehospital (emergency medical service [EMS]) and ED vital signs in a group of trauma patients transported to an inner city Major Trauma Centre. We also sought to determine factors associated with differences in recorded vital sign measurements. ⋯ Agreement was demonstrated between EMS and ED GCS scores but not RR and SBP recordings. Discrepancies appeared to reflect physiological changes in response to EMS initiated interventions. Trauma triage algorithms and risk models might need to take these measurement differences, and factors associated with them, into account.
-
Emerg Med Australas · Oct 2013
Accuracy of computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder interpretation by emergency physicians.
The study aims to determine the interpretation accuracy of computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (CT-KUB) by emergency physicians (EPs) compared with the formal radiology report, as the reference standard, in patients with suspected acute urinary tract calculous disease. ⋯ EPs can accurately detect clinically significant acute calculous disease and signs of obstruction on CT-KUB, allowing for ongoing acute management and early disposition of the patient. However, their findings should be verified against the formal radiology report when available.
-
Emerg Med Australas · Oct 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyAustralasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation trial statistical analysis plan.
The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) study is an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy compared with standard care for patients presenting to the ED with severe sepsis. ⋯ A statistical analysis plan for the ARISE study has been developed, and is available in the public domain, prior to the completion of recruitment into the study. This will minimise analytic bias and conforms to current best practice in conducting clinical trials.