The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Jun 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialArthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective randomized analysis of three techniques.
One hundred and twenty-seven patients who had a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament agreed to participate in a prospective, randomized study of three arthroscopically assisted reconstruction techniques. One hundred and twenty-five patients (125 reconstructions) were evaluated after a mean duration of follow-up of forty-two months (range, two to five years). Group I included forty patients who had a two-incision reconstruction with use of an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis graft, group II consisted of forty patients who had a two-incision reconstruction with use of an autogenous patellar-ligament graft, and group III included forty-five patients who had a single-incision reconstruction (endoscopic technique) with use of an autogenous patellar-ligament graft. ⋯ Also, it was found that the patients in group II returned to a greater level of athletic activity (p < 0.02) and that a higher percentage of the patients in this group had a difference of three millimeters or less on testing with the KT-2000 arthrometer than in the other two groups (p < 0.08). However, with the numbers available, there were no significant differences in the over-all outcome among the three groups (p > 0.1). Importantly, the rate of failure was not greater and the outcomes were not less satisfactory for the late reconstructions than they were for the acute reconstructions (those performed less than three weeks after the injury), including those done with an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis graft in a chronically unstable knee.
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Jun 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative irradiation for prevention of heterotopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty.
Eighty-six hips in eighty-five patients who were considered to be at risk for heterotopic ossification following a total hip arthroplasty were prospectively randomized or assigned to one of two treatment groups that received a single 800-centigray dose of limited-field radiation either preoperatively (Group I) or postoperatively (Group II). The risk factors for postoperative heterotopic ossification included previous heterotopic ossification following an operation about the hip, hypertrophic osteoarthrosis or post-traumatic osteoarthrosis characterized by the presence of extensive osteophytes, radiographic evidence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The hips in Group I were irradiated within 6.1 hours before the operation and those in Group II, within 51.3 hours after the operation. ⋯ Three of the ten hips that had a revision operation subsequently had a non-union of the greater trochanter; all three had been treated with preoperative irradiation. The findings of the present study suggest that pre-operative irradiation is effective for the prevention of heterotopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty and that it eliminates the discomfort and morbidity that are associated with conventional postoperative treatment. Furthermore, the efficacy of preoperative irradiation suggests that osteogenic precursor cells that are active in this process are derived from the local tissues within the operative field rather than from distant blood-borne cell lines.
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Jun 1996
Comparative StudyDifferences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.
The purpose of this study was to compare patients' and physicians' evaluations of the results of 147 total hip arthroplasties. The patients and physicians independently evaluated pain and over-all satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure using a 10.0-centimeter visual-analog scale. They also answered a questionnaire with which they assessed general health, functional ability, and pain. ⋯ This study highlights a discrepancy between patients' and physicians' evaluations of the results of total hip arthroplasty. This discrepancy increased when the patient was not satisfied with the outcome. The use of patients' self-administered questionnaires as well as traditional physician-generated assessments may provide a more complete evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty.