International wound journal
-
Multicenter Study
Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international patient perspective.
This cross-sectional international survey assessed patients' perceptions of their wound pain. A total of 2018 patients (57% female) from 15 different countries with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD = 15.4) participated. The wounds were categorised into ten different types with a mean wound duration of 19.6 months (SD = 51.8). ⋯ During the stages of the dressing change procedure; 'touching/handling the wound' was given the highest mean score of 2.9, followed by cleansing and dressing removal (n= 1944). One thousand four hundred and eighty-five (80.15%) patients responded that they liked to be actively involved in their dressing changes, 1141 (58.15%) responded that they were concerned about the long-term side-effects of medication, 790 (40.3%) of patient indicated that the pain at dressing change was the worst part of living with a wound. This study adds substantially to our knowledge of how patients experience wound pain and gives us the opportunity to explore cultural differences in more detail.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgery debridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower extremity ulcers.
Debridement of devitalised tissue is an essential component of the effective treatment of chronic wounds. The Versajet Hydrosurgery System is a new technology that simultaneously cuts and aspirates soft tissue. In this study we compared Versajet with conventional surgical techniques in the debridement of lower extremity ulcers to assess impact on time and resources for debridement. ⋯ Overall, clinical efficacy of the shorter debridement procedure was similar: median time to wound closure 71 days (Versajet) vs. 74 days (conventional) (P= 0.733). We found Versajet to be quicker than conventional debridement in the debridement of lower extremity ulcers without compromising wound healing. Potential cost savings were identified from the use of VERSAJET through the shorter debridement time allowing more patients to be treated in the same operating schedule.
-
Pin tract infection is one of the most common complications associated with the use of external fixation. While some studies have identified the potential benefit of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane dressings to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, we are unaware of any published studies that evaluate the effectiveness of similar technologies in reducing the risk for external-fixation-related pin tract infections. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane dressing in reducing percutaneous-device-related skin colonisation and local infections. ⋯ There was a significantly higher rate of pin tract infection in patients who received standard pin care compared with those who received chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane dressings (25% versus 0%, P = 0.047). There was no significant difference in any of the descriptive study characteristics (age, gender, diabetes and presence of neuropathy). The results of this initial study suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane dressing may be effective to reduce the incidence of pin tract infections and help decrease morbidity associated with external fixation.
-
This prospective study looked at the outcome of laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) treatment for hypertrophic scarring. Dermatrade mark K laser (a set of combined lasers erbium:yttrium aluminium garnet/carbon dioxide, qualified as a class IV laser) was used. Between 21 June 2000 and 19 November 2002, at the Siemianowice Burn Center, Poland, 592 interventions, using laser, were performed on N= 327 patients (220 women and 107 men, aged between 3 and 80 years). ⋯ The scars had become less red (192/327 scored no redness at the end of the study versus 92/327 upon initial), less raised (272/327 scored a flat scar versus 72/327 upon initial) and demonstrated an improved viscoelasticity (192/327 scored a soft skin versus 62/327 upon initial). Laser treatment did not improve contractures in post-burn hypertrophic scars. Results were not confirmed using objective measurement tools, as these were not available to us.