Journal of biomechanics
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Biomechanical response of intact, degenerated and repaired intervertebral discs under impact loading - Ex-vivo and In-Silico investigation.
Understanding the effect of impact loading on the mechanical response of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is valuable for investigating injury mechanisms and devising effective therapeutic modalities. This study used 24 porcine thoracic motion segments to characterize the mechanical response of intact (N = 8), degenerated (Trypsin-denatured, N = 8), and repaired (Genepin-treated, N = 8) IVDs subject to impact loading. A meta-model analysis of poroelastic finite element simulations was used in combination with ex-vivo creep and impact tests to extract the material properties. ⋯ It is concluded that the disc time-dependent response significantly changes with disc degeneration. Cross-linker Genipin has the potential to recover the hydraulic permeability and can potentially change the time dependent response, particularly in the IDP. This is the first study, to our best knowledge, which explores the effect of impact loading on the healthy, degenerated and repaired IVD using both creep and impact validation tests.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing.
A number of geometrically-detailed passive finite element (FE) models of the lumbar spine have been developed and validated under in vitro loading conditions. These models are devoid of muscles and thus cannot be directly used to simulate in vivo loading conditions acting on the lumbar joint structures or spinal implants. Gravity loads and muscle forces estimated by a trunk musculoskeletal (MS) model under twelve static activities were applied to a passive FE model of the L4-L5 segment to estimate load sharing among the joint structures (disc, ligaments, and facets) under simulated in vivo loading conditions. ⋯ Therefore, as an alternative approach to represent in vivo loading conditions in passive FE model studies, this FL can be estimated by available in-house or commercial MS models. In clinical applications and design of implants, commonly considered in vitro loading conditions on the passive FE models do not adequately represent the in vivo loading conditions under muscle exertions. Therefore, more realistic in vivo loading conditions should instead be used.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Three-dimensional primary and coupled range of motions and movement coordination of the pelvis, lumbar and thoracic spine in standing posture using inertial tracking device.
Evaluation of spinal range of motions (RoMs) and movement coordination between its segments (thorax, lumbar, and pelvis) has clinical and biomechanical implications. Previous studies have not recorded three-dimensional primary/coupled motions of all spinal segments simultaneously. Moreover, magnitude/direction of the coupled motions of the thorax/pelvis in standing posture and lumbopelvic rhythms in the frontal/transverse planes have not been investigated. ⋯ The spine had different primary RoMs in different planes/directions (flexion: lumbar: 55.4 ± 12.4°, pelvis: 42.8 ± 21.6°, and T1-T12 thoracic: 19.9 ± 6.4°, extension: lumbar: 23.4 ± 10.1°, thoracic: 11.7 ± 3.4°, and pelvis: 10.2 ± 6.4°, left/right lateral bending: thoracic: 24.5 ± 7.4°/26.5 ± 6.1°, lumbar: 16.4 ± 7.2°/18.3 ± 5.7°, and pelvis: 11.0 ± 4.4°/9.3 ± 6.2°, and left/right axial rotation: thoracic: 33.5 ± 10.0°/37.1 ± 11.7°, pelvis: 31.6 ± 12.5°/27.2 ± 12.0° and lumbar: 7.5 ± 4.5°/9.2 ± 7.3°). Pelvis, lumbar and thoracic spine had different/varying contributions/rhythms to generate total trunk (T1) movement, both within and between planes. Pattern of the coupled motions was inconsistent between subjects but side bending was generally associated with twisting to the same side at the thoracic spine and to the opposite side at the lumbar spine.