Journal of biomechanics
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Thoracolumbar spine loading associated with kinematics of the young and the elderly during activities of daily living.
Excessive mechanical loading of the spine is a critical factor in vertebral fracture initiation. Most vertebral fractures develop spontaneously or due to mild trauma, as physiological loads during activities of daily living might exceed the failure load of osteoporotic vertebra. Spinal loading patterns are affected by vertebral kinematics, which differ between elderly and young individuals. ⋯ The maximum compressive loads predicted for the elderly motion patterns were lower than those of the young for L2/L3 and L3/L4 lumbar levels during flexion and for upper thoracic levels during stand-to-sit (T1/T2-T8/T9) and sit-to-stand (T3/T4-T6/T7). However, the maximum loads predicted for the lower thoracic levels (T9/T10-L1/L2), a common site of vertebral fractures, were similar compared to the young. Nevertheless, these loads acting on the vertebrae of reduced bone quality might contribute to a higher fracture risk for the elderly.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Computational study of the role of fluid content and flow on the lumbar disc response in cyclic compression: Replication of in vitro and in vivo conditions.
The intervertebral disc viscoelastic response is governed primarily by its fluid content and flow. Invivo measurements demonstrate that the disc volume, fluid content, height and nucleus pressure completely recover during resting even after diurnal loading with twice longer duration (16 vs. 8 h). In view of much longer periods required for the recovery of disc height and pressure in vitro, concerns have been raised on the fluid inflow through the endplates that might be hampered by clogged blood vessels post mortem. ⋯ The model with free inflow increased segment height and nucleus pressure while the model with no fluid inflow resulted in a relatively small recovery in segment height and a rather constant nucleus pressure during unloading periods. Results highlight an excessive mobile fluid content as well as a restricted fluid inflow through endplates as likely causes of the discrepancies between in vivo and in vitro studies. To replicate in vivo conditions in vitro and in silico, disc hydration level should be controlled by adequate selection of preload magnitude/period and/or mobile fluid porosity.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Osmosis and viscoelasticity both contribute to time-dependent behaviour of the intervertebral disc under compressive load: A caprine in vitro study.
The mechanical behaviour of the intervertebral disc highly depends on the content and transport of interstitial fluid. It is unknown, however, to what extent the time-dependent behaviour can be attributed to osmosis. Here we investigate the effect of both mechanical and osmotic loading on water content, nucleus pressure and disc height. ⋯ This shows that annulus water content is important in the response to axial loading. After unloading, in the absence of an osmotic gradient, there was substantial viscoelastic recovery of 53(±11)% of the disc height, without a change in water content. However, for restoration of the nucleus pressure and for full restoration of disc height, restoration of the osmotic gradient was needed.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Are axial intervertebral disc biomechanics determined by osmosis?
The intervertebral disc faces high compressive forces during daily activities. Axial compression induces creeping fluid loss and reduction in disc height. With degeneration, disc fluids and height are progressively lost, altering biomechanics. ⋯ Reduction of water content and amplitude of creep and recovery showed similarity to degenerative disc biomechanics. However, the time-constants increased, indicating that the hydraulic permeability was reduced, in contrast to what happens with degeneration. This suggests that besides the osmotic gradient, the permeability of the tissues determines healthy intervertebral disc biomechanics.
-
Journal of biomechanics · Mar 2018
Three-dimensional primary and coupled range of motions and movement coordination of the pelvis, lumbar and thoracic spine in standing posture using inertial tracking device.
Evaluation of spinal range of motions (RoMs) and movement coordination between its segments (thorax, lumbar, and pelvis) has clinical and biomechanical implications. Previous studies have not recorded three-dimensional primary/coupled motions of all spinal segments simultaneously. Moreover, magnitude/direction of the coupled motions of the thorax/pelvis in standing posture and lumbopelvic rhythms in the frontal/transverse planes have not been investigated. ⋯ The spine had different primary RoMs in different planes/directions (flexion: lumbar: 55.4 ± 12.4°, pelvis: 42.8 ± 21.6°, and T1-T12 thoracic: 19.9 ± 6.4°, extension: lumbar: 23.4 ± 10.1°, thoracic: 11.7 ± 3.4°, and pelvis: 10.2 ± 6.4°, left/right lateral bending: thoracic: 24.5 ± 7.4°/26.5 ± 6.1°, lumbar: 16.4 ± 7.2°/18.3 ± 5.7°, and pelvis: 11.0 ± 4.4°/9.3 ± 6.2°, and left/right axial rotation: thoracic: 33.5 ± 10.0°/37.1 ± 11.7°, pelvis: 31.6 ± 12.5°/27.2 ± 12.0° and lumbar: 7.5 ± 4.5°/9.2 ± 7.3°). Pelvis, lumbar and thoracic spine had different/varying contributions/rhythms to generate total trunk (T1) movement, both within and between planes. Pattern of the coupled motions was inconsistent between subjects but side bending was generally associated with twisting to the same side at the thoracic spine and to the opposite side at the lumbar spine.