International heart journal
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat attenuates perioperative inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) evokes activation of a systemic inflammatory response. Sivelestat has been used clinically to treat acute lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This prospective, doubleblind, randomized study was designed to evaluate the effects of sivelestat in the perioperative period of elective pediatric open-heart surgery with CPB. ⋯ The WBC and NC levels immediately after surgery in the control group were significantly greater than those in the sivelestat group (P = 0.049, P = 0.044). The peak CRP level in the control group was significantly greater than the sivelestat group (P = 0.04), and the CRP level on postoperative day 4 in the control group was significantly greater than in the sivelestat group (P = 0.014). This study showed that sivelestat attenuates the perioperative inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery with CPB.
-
Sudden cardiac death is a serious problem in public health but the overall survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) remains low. In this study, we identified clinical parameters to predict the prognosis of OHCA patients and proposed a simple prognostication score for prediction of their prognoses. The study population consisted of 750 consecutive patients with OHCAs of internal cause who were transported to our institute from July 2008 to June 2010. ⋯ When the prognostication score was calculated from these independent predictive factors, a score of ≥ 6 points indicated survival with a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 97.6%. When the patients were divided into younger and older populations with a threshold of 70 years, these values were 94.1% and 96.1% in younger but 70.0% and 98.4% in older patients, respectively. In retrospective observation, a simple prognostication score was useful to predict patient prognoses in OHCAs, but its usefulness was limited in an older population.
-
Comparative Study
Can we obtain a noninvasive and continuous estimation of cardiac output? Comparison between three noninvasive methods.
Cardiac output (CO) is often desirable for assessing the hemodynamic condition of a patient, especially in critically ill cardiac patients. Various noninvasive methods are available for this purpose. Inert gas rebreathing (IGR) and 2D-Doppler echocardiography methods have been validated. ⋯ The intraclass correlation coefficient was poor whatever the methods. However, esCCO had a satisfactory reproducibility and accuracy compared rather well with the other 2. This method could be suitable for patient screening and monitoring.
-
There is no reliable method of screening for pregnant women at high risk of developing severe myocardial disorders. In this study, we used vector-projected 187 channel electrocardiography (DREAM-ECG) and serum biochemical markers to evaluate peripartum myocardial burden in pregnant women. Forty-one pregnant women were examined at 36-37 weeks gestation (GW36), 7 days postpartum (PPD7), and 1 month postpartum (PPM1). ⋯ Troponin T was in the normal range during the whole period (< 0.003 ng/mL). In conclusion, these results indicate that the peripartum myocardial burden in pregnant women does not return to normal nonpregnant levels by PPM1. We propose that both repolarization indexes such as RTc dispersion by DREAM-ECG and serum biochemical markers may identify pregnant women at high risk of developing severe myocardial damage in the peripartum period.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Diuretics and ultrafiltration in acute heart failure syndrome.
The use of diuretics and ultrafiltration in acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS) has been investigated in a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the benefits have been variable. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to examine the overall effect of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, renal function, dyspnea relief, and adverse events in patients with AHFS. ⋯ However, there was significantly more weight loss (WMD, 1.333 kg; 95% CI, 0.186 to 2.479; P = 0.023; I² = 57.7%) and net fluid removal (WMD, 1459.432 mL; 95% CI, 275.911 to 2642.953; P = 0.016; I² = 25.2%) in the ultrafiltration-therapy group. There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the two groups. Compared with diuretic therapy, ultrafiltration produces greater weight loss and net fluid removal in a safe and effective manner.