Journal of hospital medicine : an official publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine
-
Children with gastrointestinal infections often require acute care.The objectives of this study were to describe variations in patterns of stool testing across children's hospitals and determine whether such variation was associated with utilization outcomes. ⋯ Children with acute gastrointestinal infections experience substantial variation in stool testing within and across hospitals, with no difference in utilization outcomes. These findings highlight the need for guidelines to address diagnostic stewardship.
-
Late recognition of in-hospital deterioration is a source of preventable harm. Emergency transfers (ET), when hospitalized patients require intensive care unit (ICU) interventions within 1 h of ICU transfer, are a proximal measure of late recognition associated with increased mortality and length of stay (LOS). ⋯ MOID are common in ETs and are associated with increased mortality risk and posttransfer LOS. Diagnostic improvement strategies should be leveraged to support earlier recognition of clinical deterioration.
-
Editorial Comment
Making tools that work for us: Improving clinical decision support.
-
Inappropriate use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), including multilumen PICCs, may increase the risk of patient complications. ⋯ In this single-center study, the implementation of electronic decision support to inform appropriate catheter use led to a more appropriate midline catheter and single-lumen PICC insertion. Dissemination of this single, effective intervention to examine efficacy in other hospital settings would be welcomed.
-
While pharmacologic prophylaxis has benefits for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in high-risk patients, unnecessary use carries potential harm, including bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and patient discomfort, and should be avoided in low-risk patients. While many quality improvement initiatives aim to reduce underuse, successful models on reducing overuse are sparse in the literature. ⋯ Compared to the preintervention period, the first intervention did not change the rate of total pharmacologic prophylaxis immediately after implementation (1.7% relative change, p = .38) or over time (slope difference of 0.20 orders per 1000 patient days, p = .08). Compared to the first intervention period, the second intervention led to an immediate 4.5% reduction in total pharmacologic prophylaxis (p = .04) but increased thereafter (slope difference of 0.24, p = .03) such that weekly rates at the end of the study were similar to rates prior to the second intervention.