The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Arrhythmias. The MIAMI Trial Research Group.
Forty-five patients in the placebo (1.5%) and 29 in the metoprolol (1%) groups, respectively, were receiving antiarrhythmic drugs on a long-term basis before entry into the trial. Before randomization, 2.2% (n = 64) of the placebo and 1.7% (n = 50) of the metoprolol patients developed ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the hospital. The corresponding figures for atrial fibrillation or flutter were 3% (n = 87) and 3.3% (n = 94). ⋯ Although antiarrhythmic drugs were intended to be given only for major ventricular tachyarrhythmias a large proportion of patients received such treatment. Significantly more patients were treated with antiarrhythmics in the placebo (21.5%) than in the metoprolol group (19.2%, p = 0.03) during the study period, but predominantly during the first 5 days. Atrial fibrillation or flutter and other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were significantly less frequent in the metoprolol than in the placebo group, as was the use of cardiac glycosides.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Narcotic analgesics and other antianginal drugs. The MIAMI Trial Research Group.
The effect of metoprolol on chest pain has been assessed in terms of the duration and the use of narcotic analgesics, nitrates and calcium-channel blockers. Fewer metoprolol-treated patients in the MIAMI trial were given narcotic analgesics (49% of the placebo patients vs 44% of the metoprolol patients, p less than 0.001), nitrates (55% vs 53%, p = 0.10) and calcium-channel blockers (12% vs 9%, p less than 0.001). A total number of 6,697 dose equivalents of narcotic analgesics were given to the placebo group compared with 5,493 dose equivalents to the metoprolol group, a difference of 18% (p less than 0.001). ⋯ A multivariate analysis disclosed that site of suspected infarction, delay time, entry systolic blood pressure and metoprolol treatment all had a significant effect on the use of narcotic analgesics. There was a nonsignificant tendency for heart rate to be of importance. In the placebo group the use of narcotic analgesics increased with decreasing delay time and increasing systolic blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Clinical Trial
Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Patient population. The MIAMI Trial Research Group.
During the recruitment phase of the MIAMI trial (December 1982 to March 1984), data on 26,439 patients eligible for inclusion were entered. Of these, 5,778 patients were included. Current treatment with either beta blockers or calcium-channel blockers (51%) was the most predominant reason for exclusion. ⋯ Before randomization 20% of the patients had normal electrocardiograms; 70% could be classified as having electrocardiographic signs of acute myocardial infarction; and 10% presented with other electrocardiographic abnormalities. Electrocardiographic signs at entry suggested a predominance of anterior wall infarctions. The randomized patients were not representative of eligible patients and the treatment groups were well balanced at entry.