The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Impact of obesity on revascularization and restenosis rates after bare-metal and drug-eluting stent implantation (from the TAXUS-IV trial).
The effect of obesity on repeat coronary revascularization and restenosis in patients who undergo stent implantation has not been reported. We therefore examined the database from the multicenter randomized TAXUS-IV trial to determine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after bare-metal and drug-eluting stent implantation. In TAXUS-IV, patients were randomized to receive a slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent. ⋯ By multivariate analysis, BMI > or =30.0 kg/m2 independently predicted binary restenosis (hazard ratio 4.26, p = 0.005), 1-year target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio 1.95, p = 0.04), and major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio 1.95, p = 0.004) in patients who received bare-metal stents but not paclitaxel-eluting stents. In conclusion, obesity is an important risk factor for clinical and angiographic restenosis and for composite major adverse cardiac events in patients who receive bare-metal stents. Paclitaxel-eluting stents attenuate the increased risk associated with obesity, such that the intermediate-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention is independent of weight.
-
Comparative Study
Effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in a single medical center.
A recent large-scale, randomized trial demonstrated the noninferiority of a strategy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. There is a paucity of outcome data with bivalirudin use in the setting of real-world experience. We evaluated 6,996 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2001 and December 2004 to compare early and late outcomes with a bivalirudin-based antithrombotic regimen with those with a heparin-based regimen. ⋯ Differences in bleeding end points remained significant after adjusting for the propensity to receive bivalirudin, but there was no difference in ischemic events. There was no difference in unadjusted long-term survival rate (log-rank test p = 0.46, total number of deaths 412, mean follow-up 17 months) or in propensity-adjusted long-term survival rate (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 2.08, p = 0.14). Compared with heparin with or without GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, the use of bivalirudin in a large consecutive patient registry at a tertiary care center was associated with fewer bleeding events and no evident increase in the incidence of ischemic complications.
-
Heart failure (HF) has been classified as systolic and diastolic based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. We hypothesized that left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an important element of HF regardless of ejection fraction. Two hundred six patients who had clinical HF were compared with 72 age-matched controls. ⋯ Diastolic dysfunction is a better predictor of B-type natriuretic peptide levels and mortality than ejection fraction or left ventricular EDVI. In addition to diastolic dysfunction, HF with an ejection fraction >/=0.50 is associated with mild systolic dysfunction and an increased ratio of left ventricular mass to EDVI. In HF with an ejection fraction
-
Twenty-one of 64 patients (33%) with pulmonary embolisms with right ventricular (RV) dilation and 6 of 126 patients (5%) with pulmonary embolisms without RV dilation died during hospitalization (p <0.001). In the 64 patients with RV dilation, in-hospital mortality occurred in 2 of 18 hemodynamically unstable patients (11%) who underwent pulmonary embolectomy, in 2 of 6 hemodynamically stable patients (33%) treated with thrombolytic therapy plus intravenous heparin, and in 17 of 40 hemodynamically stable patients (43%) treated with intravenous heparin (p <0.025 comparing pulmonary embolectomy with no pulmonary embolectomy).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition among patients with renal impairment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (a subanalysis of the REPLACE-2 trial).
Among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, renal impairment is associated with an excessive risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Bivalirudin provides comparable suppression of ischemic events with a decrease in bleeding events compared with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. We examined the relation between adverse events, renal impairment, and antithrombotic therapy within a randomized comparison. ⋯ Fewer bleeding events with bivalirudin were also evident irrespective of renal dysfunction. No interaction between treatment assignment, bleeding or ischemic complications, and renal impairment was observed. The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in this high-risk group are comparable and consistent with the results of the overall trial.