The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of once-daily, niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE]).
This study compared the relative efficacy of a once-daily niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin fixed-dose combination with standard doses of atorvastatin or simvastatin, with a special emphasis on relative starting doses. Subjects (n = 315) with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol blood levels (defined as LDL cholesterol blood levels > or =160 mg/dl without coronary artery disease, or > or =130 mg/dl if coronary artery disease was present, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) were randomized to atorvastatin, simvastatin, or niacin ER/lovastatin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels from baseline. ⋯ No significant differences were seen among study groups in discontinuance due to elevated liver enzymes. No drug-induced myopathy was observed. Niacin ER/lovastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg and more effective than simvastatin 20 mg in reducing LDL cholesterol, was more effective in increasing HDL cholesterol than either atorvastatin or simvastatin, and provided greater global improvements in non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a).
-
Comparative Study
Effects of prior beta-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
We hypothesized that pretreatment with beta blockers may improve clinical outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. We pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 2,537 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), PAMI-2, and Stent PAMI trials. We classified patients into a beta group (n = 1,132) if they received beta-blocker therapy before primary angioplasty or a no-beta group (n = 1,405) if they did not. ⋯ At 1 year, mortality remained lower in beta patients (4.9% vs 6.7%, log-rank p = 0.055). After adjustment for baseline differences, beta patients had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.84; p <0.0148) and nonsignificantly lower 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.08; p = 0.11). Thus, pretreatment with beta blockers has an independent beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
-
To explore the physiologic limit of left ventricular (LV) enlargement, we performed echocardiography and air displacement plethysmography to respectively assess LV dimension and function and the body composition of Japanese professional sumo wrestlers. After excluding subjects with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) > or =17.9 pg/ml, diabetes mellitus, or asthma, 331 subjects (mean +/- SD age, 21.6 +/- 3.7 years; height 179.2 +/- 5.3 cm; weight 1,17.9 +/- 21.5 kg; percent fat, 29.6 +/- 6.6%) were analyzed. LV end-diastolic dimension averaged 58.4 +/- 3.7 mm and was within the generally regarded normal limit (< or =54 mm) in 14.5% of subjects, but was > or =60 mm in 41.1% of subjects. ⋯ LV end-diastolic dimension was not correlated with these indexes of LV function or with plasma BNP levels, but was significantly correlated with height, weight, body surface area, fat-free mass, and fat mass. These results show that among very large, highly trained, professional athletes, LV end-diastolic dimension frequently exceeds the traditionally accepted upper limit of normal for the general population. This increase in LV end-diastolic dimension may thus represent an extreme example of the physiologic adaptation of the athlete's heart.
-
There is a paucity of outcome data on patients with idiopathic pericardial effusion requiring intervention. All patients who had clinically significant pericardial effusion confirmed by echocardiography and requiring interventions between 1979 and 2000 were identified through the Echo-guided Pericardiocentesis Registry and Echocardiography and Surgical Databases. Clinical data and outcomes were obtained by review of medical records and surveys. ⋯ For most patients with clinically significant idiopathic pericardial effusion requiring intervention, echo-guided pericardiocentesis was the definitive treatment. Pericardiectomy was necessary for patients in whom effusion occurred in the context of effusive constrictive disease, chronic relapsing pericarditis, or recurrent effusion despite pericardiocentesis. The prognosis for the cohort was favorable, and survival did not appear to differ from that of the general population (p = 0.372).