The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Electrophysiologic effects of sotalol and amiodarone in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
No prospective studies have compared sotalol and amiodarone during electropharmacologic testing. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the electrophysiologic effects of sotalol and amiodarone in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Patients with coronary artery disease and sustained monomorphic VT inducible by programmed stimulation were randomly assigned to receive either sotalol (n = 17) or amiodarone (n = 17). ⋯ There were no significant differences in the effects of sotalol and amiodarone on the ventricular effective refractory period. In patients with coronary artery disease, amiodarone and sotalol are similar in efficacy in the treatment of VT as assessed by electropharmacologic testing. The effects of the 2 drugs on ventricular refractoriness are similar, but amiodarone slows VT to a greater extent than sotalol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Intravenous diltiazem for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and moderate to severe congestive heart failure.
The objective of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous diltiazem in the treatment of 37 patients with rapid (ventricular rate, mean +/- SD 142 +/- 17 beats/min) atrial fibrillation or flutter and moderate to severe congestive heart failure (ejection fraction, mean +/- SD 36 +/- 14%; New York Heart Association class III [23 patients], class IV [14 patients]). During the double-blind portion of the study, patients received either intravenous diltiazem, 0.25 mg/kg over 2 minutes, or placebo followed 15 minutes later by diltiazem or placebo, 0.35 mg/kg over 2 minutes, if the first dose was tolerated but ineffective. Placebo nonresponders were given open-label intravenous diltiazem in a similar fashion as in the double-blind portion of the study. ⋯ All 15 patients (13 with 0.25 mg/kg and 2 with an additional 0.35 mg/kg) who received placebo during the double-blind period had a therapeutic response to diltiazem during open-label therapy. Overall, 36 of 37 patients (97%) had a therapeutic response to intravenous diltiazem. Heart rate response to diltiazem after the 2-minute bolus infusions consisted of a > or = 20% decrease in heart rate from baseline in 36 patients; in addition, 17 patients also had heart rates decreased to < 100 beats/min, whereas no patient had conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Retrograde coil embolization of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has been reported for ducts < 3.3 mm in diameter using 5 to 5.5Fr catheters. Our objective was to assess the immediate and short-term results of anterograde transcatheter closure of the PDA using single or multiple Gianturco coils. Thirty-three patients (11 males and 22 females) underwent an attempt at transcatheter closure of the PDA anterogradely at a median age of 2.8 years (range 0.1 to 19) and median weight of 14 kg (range 2.3 to 64). ⋯ The 2 unsuccessful attempts were in 2 patients with a large ductus measuring > or = 4.3 mm and of angiographic type B. For all 13 patients in whom a single coil and in 17 patients in whom multiple coils were placed, there was immediate complete closure that persisted at a median follow-up period of 3.8 months. The median fluoroscopy time was 24 minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Determination of cardiac output using acoustic quantification in critically ill patients.
The reliability of automated acoustic quantification (AQ) in yielding real-time left ventricular (LV) area, volume, and ejection fraction has been validated. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of AQ in providing accurate immediate determination of cardiac output in critically ill patients. A total of 48 patients were studied. ⋯ There was a similar underestimation of cardiac output with manual analysis when compared with thermodilution. Given the absence of significant differences between AQ and manual analysis, this observation suggests that the bias is related to the echocardiographic determination of stroke volume, and not to errors from the automated border detection. It is concluded that AQ, besides providing information on LV volumes and ejection fraction, also can yield rapid measurements of cardiac output in most patients who are acutely ill.
-
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both used widely for angina but information about their comparative efficacy is limited. This study compared the outcome of 358 consecutive patients undergoing initial revascularization for significant narrowing of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) by PTCA (n = 254) or CABG (n = 104) from 1987 to 1989. PTCA was successful in 93% but complicated by urgent CABG in 3%. ⋯ Both groups achieved similar status, with 81% of PTCA and 90% of CABG patients having angina no worse than functional class I. Quality-of-life index was high for both groups (0.983 +/- 0.034/1.000 vs 0.987 +/- 0.032/1.000, p = 0.3). Both PTCA and CABG result in excellent survival, functional ability, and quality of life, but patients undergoing PTCA require more procedures to achieve this.