The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Clinical predictors of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks (results of the CASCADE trial). Cardiac Arrest in Seattle, Conventional versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation.
The Cardiac Arrest in Seattle, Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) study evaluated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in high-risk survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for 228 patients was randomized to amiodarone or conventional antiarrhythmic drugs. Additional therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was provided to 105 of these patients. ⋯ The independent clinical predictors of shocks were low ejection fraction (p = 0.002), female gender (p = 0.007) and conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.015). The only independent predictor of a shock associated with syncope was conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy (p = 0.035). Patients treated with amiodarone receive fewer shocks than patients treated with conventional drug therapy.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Atrial septal defect occlusion with the buttoned device (a multi-institutional U.S. trial).
A clinical trial was conducted of the buttoned device for transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect. Occlusion was attempted in 57 patients aged 1 to 62 years (median 5). The procedure was abandoned in 7 patients after 1 or more unsuccessful attempts, and devices were released in 50 patients. ⋯ An episode of asymptomatic atrial flutter was noted in a 46-year-old patient which may have been related to device implantation, but which has not recurred. There have been no cases of endocarditis or thromboembolism in 350 patient-months of follow-up. The buttoned device provided effective closure of the atrial septal defect in 45 of 57 patients (79%) in whom implantation was attempted and in 45 of 46 patients (98%) in whom device implantation was successfully accomplished.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
The purpose of this study was to determine if adenosine is equally effective in terminating catecholamine-dependent and independent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The effect of adenosine on termination of SVT was studied in 21 patients: 12 with atrioventricular (AV) reciprocating tachycardia, and 9 with AV node reentrant tachycardia. Group 1 comprised 13 patients who had SVT induced in the absence of exogenous catecholamines, whereas group 2 comprised 8 who needed isoproterenol (1.6 +/- 0.4 micrograms/min) for induction. ⋯ The mean dose of adenosine needed to terminate SVT was 52 +/- 6 micrograms/kg of body weight in group 1, and 61 +/- 12 micrograms/kg in group 2 (p > 0.05). In addition to isoproterenol not altering the minimal dose of adenosine necessary to terminate SVT, there was also no correlation between the dose of adenosine (mean 55 +/- 6 micrograms/kg) of each patient, and the corresponding endogenous epinephrine (273 +/- 59 pg/ml) (r = -0.19) and norepinephrine (400 +/- 58 pg/ml) (r = 0.01) levels during SVT, or cycle length of SVT (323 +/- 9 ms) (r = -0.35). The results show that adenosine is equally effective in terminating catecholamine-dependent and independent SVT; higher adenosine doses should not be needed to manage catecholamine-dependent SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)