The American journal of cardiology
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Changes in standard electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation predictive of successful reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction.
The ability of the electrocardiographic ST segment to predict successful reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy remains controversial. To evaluate whether angiographically determined reperfusion could be predicted from changes in ST-segment elevation, the sum of ST-segment elevation in affected leads of the electrocardiogram was compared before and after thrombolytic therapy in 53 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Reperfusion status of the infarct-related artery was determined angiographically less than 8 hours from onset of symptoms. ⋯ A 20% decrease in ST elevation provided such a level (88% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The positive and negative predictive values of a 20% decrease in ST elevation were 88 and 80%, respectively. These results suggest that a decrease of only 20% in the sum of ST elevation in the standard electrocardiogram after thrombolytic therapy is a useful noninvasive predictor of reperfusion status in patients with evolving AMI.
-
The feasibility, safety and clinical impact of transesophageal echocardiography were evaluated in 51 critically ill intensive care unit patients (28 men and 23 women; mean age 63 years) in whom transthoracic echocardiography was inadequate. At the time of transesophageal echocardiography, 30 patients (59%) were being mechanically ventilated. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed without significant complications in 49 patients (96%), and 2 patients with heart failure had worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory difficulties after insertion of the transesophageal probe. ⋯ In the remaining patients, transesophageal echocardiography permitted confident exclusion of suspected abnormalities because of its superior imaging qualities. Cardiac surgery was prompted by transesophageal echocardiographic findings in 12 patients (24%) and these findings were confirmed at operation in all. Therefore, transesophageal echocardiography can be safely performed and has a definite role in the diagnosis and expeditious management of critically ill cardiovascular patients.
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Advantages of beta blockers versus antiarrhythmic agents and calcium antagonists in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.
Patients who have sustained greater than or equal to 1 myocardial infarcts are at high risk for sudden death or reinfarction; the risk is highest for those with lowest ventricular ejection fraction, continuing myocardial ischemia and asymptomatic high-density and complex premature ventricular contractions. At present, beta blockers when given prophylactically are the only agents that reduce the incidence of sudden death and reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 2 years. The beneficial effect was shown to correlate with a reduction in heart rate, the effect being absent or deleterious with beta blockers with marked sympathomimetic activity. ⋯ Whether these data can be extrapolated to all class I agents is uncertain. Preliminary data with class III antiarrhythmic agents suggest that these agents, especially amiodarone, similarly to beta blockers, have the potential to reduce mortality in survivors of MI. Evolving data suggest that in the secondary prevention of morbid events in the survivors of acute MI, the focus must shift away from antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction and toward beta blockers and antifibrillatory actions resulting from a prolongation of refractoriness.
-
A prospective study correlated the effect of quinidine or procainamide versus no antiarrhythmic drug on sudden cardiac death, total cardiac death and total death in 406 elderly patients with heart disease and asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms. Of 397 patients treated with quinidine, 184 (46%) developed adverse effects during the first 2 weeks of therapy and were given no further antiarrhythmic therapy. Of 9 patients treated with procainamide, 2 (22%) developed adverse effects during the first 2 weeks of therapy and were given no further antiarrhythmic therapy. ⋯ Survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 groups for sudden cardiac death, total cardiac death or total death through 4 years. Patients with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction had a 3.4 times higher incidence of sudden cardiac death, a 2.4 times higher incidence of total cardiac death and a 1.4 times higher incidence of total death than patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. These data showed no significant difference in sudden cardiac death, total cardiac death or total death between patients treated with quinidine or procainamide or with no antiarrhythmic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)