Injury
-
Percutaneous scaphoid fixation through either a volar or dorsal approach has the advantage of minor soft tissue damage compared with ORIF, and faster fracture union compared with conservative treatment. However, this technique demands highly intraoperative reliance on X-ray control, including increased radiation exposure and all associated side effects. ⋯ Our results indicate that percutaneous scaphoid fixation with the guide wire placed in a 45° horizontal and vertical angle enables primary moderate positioning, which may lead to quicker adjustment to the ideal position and a decrease of radiation exposure.
-
Unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries should be stabilised successfully by percutaneous iliosacral screwing. The intervention takes place under intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. The inlet and outlet views are crucial and are performed by tilting the image intensifier. Safely interpreting fluoroscopic views can be challenging in certain clinical scenarios. We demonstrated on a series of patients howpreoperative CT scans can be used to anticipate the appropriate intraoperative inlet and outlet fluoroscopic views and positioning of the patient on the operating table, thereby avoiding possible operating table obstacles. ⋯ The significant anatomic variations of the posterior pelvic ring have been well documented in the literature. The angles required to obtain appropriate intraoperative inlet and outlet views are not perpendicular and differ greatly from traditional settings, which directed the beam 45° caudally and 45° cranially. The fluoroscopic beam would need to be angled differently in each patient to obtain ideal cardinal views that ultimately assist in safe iliosacral screw placement. To avoid collision of the C-arm with the operating table, it is essential to provide secure free space under the operating table of at least 145cm.
-
Comparative Study
Functional outcome after calcaneus fractures: a comparison between polytrauma patients and isolated fractures.
Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) can have long-term consequences in terms of foot pain and disability. This injury frequently occurs in the context of polytrauma patients and its influence in long-term functional prognosis is well known. The purpose of this study is to compare the etiology, severity, and functional outcome of the operated DIACFs between polytrauma patients and isolated cases. ⋯ No differences in outcome measures and second surgeries were found between polytrauma patients and isolated fractures. For DIACFs, the severity of the impact was correlated with a higher number of second surgeries and worse functional outcomes. Following a DIACF, patients with psychiatric comorbidities presented worse health-related quality of life than people without this background.
-
The stabilization of an atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability is demanding due to a complex atlantoaxial anatomy with proximity to the spinal cord, a variable run of the vertebral artery (VA) and narrow C2 pedicles. We perfomed the Goel & Harms fusion in combination with an intraoperative 3D imaging to ensure correct screw placement in the C2 pedicle. We hypothesized, that narrow C2 pedicles lead to a higher malposition rate of screws by perforation of the pedicle wall. The purpose of this study was to describe a certain pedicle size, under which the perforation rate rises. ⋯ The hypothesis, that narrow pedicles lead to a higher perforation rate of the pedicle wall, can be accepted. Pedicles of <6.6mm turned out to be a risk factor for a perforation of the pedicle wall (GRGr 2 or higher). Intraoperative 3D imaging is a feasible tool to confirm optimal screw position, which becomes even more important in cases with thin pedicles. The rising risk of VA injury in these cases support the additional use of navigation.
-
During night and on weekends, in our emergency department there is no radiologist on duty or on call: thus, X-ray examinations (XR) are evaluated by the orthopaedic surgeon on duty and reported the following morning/monday by radiologists. The aim of our study was to examine the discrepancy rate between orthopaedists and radiologists in the interpretation of imaging examinations performed on patients in our tertiary level orthopaedic institution and the consequences of delayed diagnosis in terms of patient management and therapeutic strategy. ⋯ A low rate of discrepancy between orthopaedists and radiologists in evaluating images of patients admitted to our emergency department was found, although treatment change occurred in about half of cases. A thorough and accurate clinical evaluation is crucial to provide a correct treatment and prognosis.