Injury
-
The Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) is an angle-stable plate that enables treatment of distal femoral comminuted and periprosthetic fracture. As it is placed through a minimally-invasive lateral approach, lateral knee pain is a commonly described symptom after its application. This study investigates knee lateral collateral ligament (LCL) iatrogenic injury during LISS plate fixation. A cadaver study was performed and a retrospective radiological investigation with the analysis of its clinical application was conducted to evaluate possible knee LCL damage. ⋯ The LISS is a safe option to treat distal femoral fractures in respect to the LCL. Due to close proximity, the LCL might be harmed; therefore, lateral knee pain or lateral instability after implantation should be assessed in further treatment.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of volar and dorsal plate osteosynthesis for radial shaft fractures: an anatomical pilot study.
No publication has yet described the interface between the radius and the plate in various positions. Neither clinical examination nor assessment of fracture radiographs provides information about the anatomy of the radius before injury. ⋯ This incongruence between the radial cortex at the volar diaphysis and the plate should be considered when applying plates to this position of the radius. The results of this cadaver study indicate that radius plate osteosynthesis should preferably be done from the dorsal side.
-
To determine the prevalence of vision loss due to ocular trauma in Australia. ⋯ We estimate that 2.4 per 1000 non-Indigenous and 7.9 per 1000 Indigenous Australian adults have monocular vision loss due to a previous severe ocular trauma. Our findings indicate that males, Indigenous Australians and those residing in Very Remote communities may benefit from targeted health promotion to improve awareness of trauma prevention strategies.
-
Comparative Study
Plate versus intramedullary fixation of two-part and multifragmentary displaced midshaft clavicle fractures - a long-term analysis.
Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is predominantly achieved with intramedullary (IM) or plate fixation. Both techniques have potential pitfalls: plate fixation involves greater periosteal stripping and protuberance of the implant, whereas IM fixation may be associated with implant-related complications, such as migration or skin irritation, which may lead to further surgery for implant removal. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods in simple (Robinson 2b.1) and multifragmentary (Robinson 2b.2) displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. ⋯ IM fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.1) has an equivalent non-union rate to plate fixation and similarly low complication and reoperation rates. For displaced midshaft multifragmentary clavicle fractures (Robinson 2b.2), the higher non-union rates observed with IM fixation leads us to recommend consideration of plate fixation for Robinson 2b.2 fractures.