Injury
-
Cerclage techniques are simple, yet effective techniques to treat certain fractures and are known as one of the first operative techniques in orthopaedic surgery. The days when a twisted metal wire was the only available cerclage technique nonetheless have passed and today there are many different materials and techniques available. This review evaluates the differences between metallic and non-metallic cerclage techniques, thereby looking at biomechanical, technical and biological aspects. ⋯ Currently metallic cerclage is mostly used to repair fractures because of its believed higher absolute strength. More recently though, non-metallic cerclage has been proven to withstand the same loads, while having a lower complication rate. This review suggests that mainly in the upper limb a non-metallic cerclage technique might become the golden standard, while in the lower limb both metallic and non-metallic cerclage techniques are complementary and dependent on indication.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A qualitative study of patients' experience of recovery after a distal femoral fracture.
This qualitative study was conducted as part of a feasibility study for TrAFFix, (ISRCTN92089567), a randomised controlled trial that will compare two surgical interventions used to fix distal femoral fractures. Our aim was to understand patients' experiences of treatment and the early phase of recovery after a distal femoral fracture. While, much is known about the experience of recovery from hip fracture, little is known about whether patients with other lower limb fragility fractures experience the same concerns and challenges. ⋯ Our findings highlight the struggle patients endure while recovering after a distal femoral fracture and the limited rehabilitative support they receive after discharge from hospital. They reinforce the need to ensure a patient feels informed about their treatment and recovery and the need for greater support for patients to manage at home and move with confidence.
-
Multicenter Study
Early coagulation support protocol: A valid approach in real-life management of major trauma patients. Results from two Italian centres.
Early coagulation support (ECS) includes prompt infusion of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, and packed red blood cells for initial resuscitation of major trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effects, in terms of blood product consumption, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality, of the ECS protocol, compared to the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in the treatment of major trauma patients. ⋯ The ECS protocol was effective in reducing blood product consumption compared to the MTP and confirmed the importance of early fibrinogen administration as a strategy of rapid coagulation. This novel approach may be adopted in real-life management of major trauma patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Mobility after intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with either a sliding hip screw or a cephalomedullary nail: Sub group analysis of a randomised trial of 1000 patients.
The aim of this study was to determine if different patient groups have superior mobility regain following intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with a cephomedullary nail compared to a sliding hip screw (SHS). ⋯ Fixation of an intertrochanteric hip fracture with a cephomedullary nail results in superior recovery of mobility for younger patients who prior to the injury were more mobile, cognitively intact and living at home.
-
The implementation of trauma systems has led to a significant reduction in mortality and length of hospital stay. In our level I trauma centre, 24/7 in-hospital coverage was implemented, and a renovation of the trauma room took place to improve the trauma care. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the optimised in-hospital infrastructure in terms of mortality, processes and clinical outcomes. ⋯ Optimisation of the in-hospital infrastructure related to trauma care resulted in improved survival rates in both severely injured patients as well as in the whole trauma population. Moreover, the processes and clinical outcomes improved, showing a shorter hospital length of stay, shorter TR time, fewer complications and fewer delayed diagnoses.