Injury
-
Movement or gait analysis has become a viable assessment tool not only used in sports science or basic biomechanical research, but has also expanded to be a very valuable instrument in clinical diagnostics, monitoring functional recovery and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. In this context, this method has long been an integral part solely in neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy. However, in the meantime the benefits have also become apparent in other medical areas, such as foot surgery, orthopaedic technology, or in patients after lower limb amputation. ⋯ The following review highlights the various fields of movement analysis, including markerless motion capture, marker-based analysis, pedobarography and wearable sensors. Each of these areas presents its own field of application and potential usage as well as the advantages and disadvantages arising in this context. The following article will give an overview of the type of measurement technology used, the respective fields of application, and the selected parameters and their interpretation possibilities for each of the areas mentioned.
-
Intra-articular fractures are a unique subset of fractures as they involve a varying extent of damage to cartilage. The impact of this articular fracture causes significant microscopic and macroscopic changes, as well as biomechanical irregularities, which can lead to further cartilage damage, and ultimately cascade down the dreaded path to arthritis. ⋯ A comprehensive literature review was carried out to create a best available evidence guide to the acceptability of upper extremity and lower extremity articular fracture reductions. Ultimately, a perfect anatomic reduction is the best strategy to minimize abnormal loading and wear patterns, however this should be balanced with the realistic factors of each individual case, such as the level of difficulty, joint involved, surgical timing, and patient activity levels.
-
Multicenter Study
Parent perspectives and psychosocial needs 2 years following child critical injury: A qualitative inquiry.
To provide effective care and promote wellbeing and positive outcomes for parents and families following paediatric critical injury there is a need to understand parent experiences and psychosocial support needs. This study explores parent experiences two years following their child's critical injury. ⋯ A long-term dedicated trauma family support role is required to ensure continuity of care, integration of support and early targeted intervention to prevent long-term adverse outcomes for critically injured children and their families. Early and ongoing psychosocial intervention would help strengthen parental adaptation and address families' psychosocial support needs following child injury.
-
The management of rectal trauma remains controversial. There are three modalities which have been used to manage these injuries; proximal diversion (PD), washout of the distal rectum (DRW) and presacral drainage (PSD). The EAST group tentatively advocate mandatory proximal diversion for extraperitoneal rectal injuries and omitting DRW or PSD. Other authors have suggested that diversion can be eschewed in patients with an intraperitoneal injury which can be primarily repaired. In light of all these controversies, this project set out to review our experience with rectal injuries over the last seven years with the objective of reviewing our use of PD, PSD and DRW. ⋯ Rectal injuries are associated with significant septic related morbidity and mortality. Although we have begun to avoid diversion in a small subset of patients with an intraperitoneal injury, we continue to perform PD for the vast majority of patients with a rectal injury. We do not perform DRW and PSD is used in highly selective cases.
-
Observational Study
Impact of high-dose norepinephrine during intra-hospital damage control resuscitation of traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A propensity-score analysis.
The use of norepinephrine (NE) during uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock (HS) has mostly been investigated in experimental studies. Clinical data including norepinephrine dose and its impact on fluid resuscitation and organ function are scarce. We hypothesized that there is great variability in NE use and that high doses of NE could lead to increased organ dysfunction as measured by the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). ⋯ We included patients with HS (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg in severely injured patients) who required haemostasis surgery and a transfusion of more than 4 packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first 6 h of admission and the used of norepinephrine infusion to maintain the blood pressure goal, between admission and the end of haemostasis surgery in a prospective trauma database. A ROC curve determined that, using Youden's criterion, a dose of NE ≥ 0.6 µg/kg/min was the optimal threshold associated with intrahospital mortality. Patients were compared according to this threshold in a propensity score (PS) model. In a generalized linear mixed model, we searched for independent factors associated with a SOFA ≥ 9 at 24 h RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were analysed. Fluid infusion rate ranged from 1.43 to 57.9 mL/kg/h and norepinephrine infusion rate from 0.1 to 2.8 µg/kg/min. The HDNE group received significantly less fluid than the LDNE group. This dose is associated with a higher SOFA score at 24h: 9 (7-10) vs. 7 (6-9) (p = 0.003). Factors independently associated with a SOFA score ≥ 9 at 24 h were maximal norepinephrine rate ≥ 0.6 µg/kg/min (OR 6.69, 95% CI 1.82 - 25.54; p = 0.004), non-blood resuscitation volume < 9 mL/kg/h (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.14 - 13.95; p = 0.031) and lactate at admission ≥ 5 mmol/L (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.48 - 18.77; p = 0.010) CONCLUSION: High dose of norepinephrine infusion is associated with deleterious effects as attested by a higher SOFA score at 24 h and likely hypovolemia as measured by reduced non-blood resuscitation volume. We did not find any significant difference in mortality over the long term.