Injury
-
Recent studies have suggested that skeletal muscle area (SMA) and psoas muscle area (PMA), markers for sarcopenia, are associated with the prognosis of many diseases. However, it remains unclear which of the two is a superior prognostic marker. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyse these markers in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). ⋯ Less amount of psoas muscle (PM) was found to be a significant risk factor for the prognosis of patients with TBI. PM was a better prognostic marker than skeletal muscle (SM) in patients with TBI. Further studies are needed to increase our understanding of sarcopenia and TBI.
-
Background To assess the predictive performance of two established, short clinical screeners in predicting the future development of post-injury depression and PTSD. Methods This was a prospective, cohort design with a 3-month follow-up. Black adult male trauma patients were enrolled at an urban, Level 1 trauma center. ⋯ Conclusions This study validated the performance of both screeners within the same population, allowing a direct comparison. Two predictive screeners, developed through different methods and in different countries, showed comparable predictive ability. These findings indicate that risk markers for adverse psychological consequences of traumatic injury share some core similarities across populations and countries.
-
Many centers now perform surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). This single center study aimed to investigate temporal trends by year in patient selection, operative characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes We hypothesized that, over time, patient selection, time to SSRF, operative time, and in-hospital outcomes varied significantly. ⋯ In-hospital outcomes after SSRF improved over time. Unexpectedly, operative time increased. The reason for this finding is likely multifactorial and may be related to patient selection, onboarding of new surgeons, fracture characteristics, and minimally invasive exposures. Due to potential for confounding, study year should be accounted for when evaluating outcomes of SSRF.
-
Evaluating pre-hospital triage and decision-making in patients who died post-trauma is crucial to decrease undertriage and improve future patients' chances of survival. A study that has adequately investigated this is currently lacking. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate pre-hospital triage and decision-making in patients who died within 30 days post-trauma. ⋯ Approximately 14% of the severely injured patients who died within 30 days were undertriaged and could have benefited from treatment at a level-I trauma center (i.e., specialized trauma care). Improvement of pre-hospital triage is needed to potentially increase future patients' chances of survival.
-
Hemorrhage in major trauma is life-threatening and the activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) was found to reduce the time to transfusion and mortality. The purpose was (i) to verify whether MTP activation identifies patients that require massive transfusions once admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), (ii) to establish whether pre-hospital MTP activation reduces the time to transfusion on arrival at the ED, (iii) to identify the variable that best predicts MTP activation. ⋯ Pre-hospital MTP activation is useful to identify patients that require an urgent blood transfusion on arrival at the ED. Further analysis should be considered to evaluate the implementation of the Shock Index as a criterion to activate MTP.