Injury
-
Traumatic cervical spine (c-spine) injuries account for 10% of all spinal injuries. The c-spine is prone to injury by blunt acceleration/deceleration traumas. The Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS criteria guide clinical decision-making but lack consensus on imaging modality when necessary. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CT, MRI, X-Ray, and, for the first time, LODOX-Statscan in identifying c-spine injuries in patients with blunt trauma and neck pain. ⋯ While CT offers high sensitivity for detecting traumatic c-spine injury, MRI holds clinical significance in revealing injuries not recognized by CT in symptomatic patients. LODOX and projection radiography are insufficient for accurately ruling out c-spine injury. For patients with neurological symptoms, we recommend extended MRI use when CT scans are negative.
-
Mechanism of injury (MOI) plays a significant role in a decision to perform whole-body computed tomography (CT) imaging for trauma patients. Various mechanisms have unique patterns of injury and therefore form an important variable in decision making. ⋯ Pre-arrival information including MOI and vital signs have significant impact on identifying subsequent injuries with CT imaging. In high energy trauma, we should consider the need for whole-body CT based on MOI alone regardless of the clinical examination findings. However, for low-energy trauma, including FFSH, in the absence of clinical examination findings which support an internal injury, a screening whole-body CT is unlikely to yield a positive result, particularly in the age group <65yo.
-
Case Reports
Is there a time when we should treat a fresh hip fracture in a physiologically elder patient with palliative care?
HISTORY - A 92-year-old female patient presents to the Emergency Room with a displaced intertrochanteric hip fracture after a fall from bed. She lives in a full care nursing home with severe dementia and wears an adult diaper. She does not walk anymore (for 3 months) and the family decision makers (they have power of attorney) have decided that she is not a surgical candidate except under extreme circumstance. ⋯ She only communicates when she has pain and does not recognize her family when they visit. Her hemoglobin and electrolytes are within normal limits. Her vitals are stable, and she is mildly hypertensive.
-
The purpose of this study is to compare medium to long term patient reported outcomes to one-year data for patients treated surgically for an aseptic fracture nonunion. ⋯ Level IV.
-
The incidence of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is reported, with conflicting results. To ensure evidence-based practice, the variation in treatment over time should be monitored. Treatment in the elderly population is particularly interesting because newer guidelines find little indication for surgery. Our primary aim was to assess the incidence and treatment of DRFs in the adult population. Secondly, we assessed the treatment stratified on non-elderly (aged 18-64 years) and elderly (aged 65+ years) patients. ⋯ We found a 31% increase in DRFs over a 22-year period, mostly driven by an increase in the size of the elderly population. The surgical rate increased markedly even in the elderly group. There is a lack of evidence on how beneficial surgery is for elderly patients, and similar surgical rate between the elderly and non-elderly calls for hospitals to re-evaluate their treatment strategies.