Injury
-
Severe open lower limb fractures are complex and costly injuries. Studies reporting the costs associated with these injuries, the economic impact of complications, and the clinical benefit of adherence to national guidelines have been previously reported. However, the economic benefits of national guidelines and their relationship with length of inpatient stay have not been described. ⋯ The presence of national guidelines for the management of severe lower limb injuries is associated with both improved clinical outcomes and reduced length of stay and therefore healthcare burden. Whilst application and adoption of national guidelines is not without challenges, their implementation is associated with significant clinical and economic benefits.
-
Unstable posterior pelvic-ring fractures are rare and difficult to manage. There are many injury patterns, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and optimal surgical management remains contentions. This study aims to compare outcomes and complications for different surgical management of these injuries. ⋯ This study highlight bilateral posterior-pelvic ring injuries as a greater management challenge than unilateral injuries. It supports the use of percutaneous fixation with closed-reduction, decreased infection risk and decreased length-of-stay. It challenges the use of external fixators and supports less restrictive post-operative restrictions. This study also serves as a descriptive analysis for the current management of pelvic fractures in an Australian setting, shedding light on complication rates and profiles.
-
Long bone fractures with concomitant vascular injury have the potential to be life and limb threatening injuries, with increased risk for limb loss. There is currently no established surgical order of operations for orthopaedic and vascular intervention. This study compares injury classification, warm ischemia time and patient outcomes in patients with long bone fractures and associated vascular injury after orthopaedic versus vascular primary intervention. ⋯ This study demonstrates collaborative care between surgical teams to minimize warm ischemia time is crucial in patients with lower extremity fractures associated with vascular injury. There is no significant difference in patient outcomes including definitive intraoperative transfusion requirements, amputation, time to weight bearing or infection when comparing primary orthopaedic versus vascular intervention.
-
Proximal femoral fractures has been associated with high mortality risk, while little is known about more distal lower extremity fractures. The aim was to report 30- and 365-days mortality in surgically treated lower extremity fractures in individuals above 65 years. ⋯ There was an observed high risk of mortality in surgically treated femoral fractures. The mortality risks seems to rapidly decline when the fractures are below the knee.
-
Standard operating procedures aim to achieve a standardized and assumedly high-quality therapy. However, in orthopaedic surgery, the aspect of temporal urgency is often based on surgical tradition and experience. At a time of evidence-based medicine, it is necessary to question these temporal guidelines. The following review will therefore address the most important temporal guidelines in orthopaedic surgery and discuss their practical relevance and potential need for optimization. ⋯ Based on the current data, resource-adapted surgical planning seems reasonable. Further research in these areas is necessary to determine the best timing of treatment and address existing doubts.