Injury
-
Assuta Ashdod Hospital is a regional trauma center. The hospital received casualties on the first day of the civilian massacre of October 7th and thereafter. The Assuta Ashdod Hospital was designated as an emergency landing site only for unstable or deteriorating patients who would not survive longer flights to a central trauma center. The aim of this study is to share our experience and challenges as a new regional trauma center in a war zone. ⋯ The outcomes of patients admitted to the Assuta Ashdod Hospital were good in treating major trauma patients in a mass casualty event, reaffirming its capabilities as an excellent regional trauma center. Therefore, we suggest that the guidelines for evacuation of battle or major casualty events victims only to central trauma centers unless patients are unstable should be reconsidered, and regional trauma centers could effectively share the burden of the treatment of those patients.
-
Recovery after severe injury may be impacted by a range of psychological factors. This multi-site study investigated the prevalence and impact of anxiety and depression at one year after trauma critical care admission. ⋯ Anxiety and depression are significant longer-term impacts after severe injury. Younger age, penetrating injury and psychological comorbidities may be identifiers of longer-term anxiety and depression following trauma critical care. Pain at one-year had a strong association and represents a modifiable target to improve psychological outcomes.
-
Chest trauma is a common presentation to major trauma centres. Risk assessment tools have proven useful to support decision making in this group and the STUMBL (STUdy of the Management of BLunt chest wall trauma) score is one such measure that has been increasingly utilised. The aim of this study was to retrospectively validate the STUMBL score in an Australian population of patients admitted following chest trauma. ⋯ The performance measures of the STUMBL score are suboptimal in our population. The best performing measure was the ability to predict ICU admission. Further validation work that includes additional factors may improve the positive predictive value and clinical utility of the score in our cohort.
-
The American College of Surgeons now requires mental health screening and follow up for hospitalized patients in trauma centers. National estimates indicate that 20-40 % of these patients will develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression within one year post-injury. Research has identified brief bedside screens that predict PTSD and depression post-discharge, such as the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory. However, false negatives are common; almost a quarter of patients with a negative bedside risk screen may develop PTSD or depression post-discharge and may not receive appropriate follow up. As such, there is critical need to improve bedside risk-screening tools. We aimed to identify demographic, social, and trauma-related predictors of mental health symptoms among patients with negative bedside screens. ⋯ Findings suggest that risk-screening tools may be improved by including items that capture injury mechanism and social support. Alternatively, trauma centers should consider mental health referral for patients who have experienced violent trauma or have low levels of social support, even when bedside screening tools identify them as having low mental health risk.
-
We compare the treatment and outcomes of penetrating and blunt splenic trauma at Major Trauma Centres (MTC) within the UK. ⋯ A trend is seen towards the use of operative management in penetrating splenic trauma. There is a high splenic embolisation failure rate (32.0 %) in penetrating trauma although mortality for those embolised was similar to the blunt injury group.