Injury
-
Comparative Study
Biomechanical analysis of various internal fracture fixation devices used for treating femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis.
Several internal fixation devices are available for treating Pauwels type I, II and III femoral neck fractures. The present study compared various fixation implants for all Pauwels fracture types using a CT-based subject-specific finite element model of the femur and determined the most effective implant for each fracture type. ⋯ The DHS with AR-screw implanted model was identified as the most effective in treating Pauwels I and III fractures. However, for Pauwels type II, DCS with an AR-screw implant was deemed superior to the other configurations.
-
Femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young and middle-aged adults are primarily caused by high-energy injuries in traffic accidents. Surgical delays often occur due to transportation issues, preoperative evaluations, and economic burdens. ⋯ Early surgical intervention, within a 2-days period after injury, seems to be crucial for young adults with FNF. If CRIF is challenging in some cases, ORIF can be another choice.
-
The sustentaculum tali is a biomechanically important stabilizer of the hindfoot and contributes to articular congruency of the subtalar joint. Sustentaculum injury associated with a talus fracture has been described infrequently and treatment of this combined injury varies. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the outcomes of the combined talus and sustentaculum fracture. ⋯ IV.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Prevalence of fracture progression in fragility fractures of the pelvis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a growing problem in aging populations. Fracture progression (FP) occasionally occurs during FFP treatment; however, its prevalence remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of FP among patients with FFP. ⋯ This review suggests that the prevalence of FP in patients with FFP is relatively high. Clinicians should recognize FP as a possible diagnosis in patients experiencing additional pain after FFP. However, further prospective studies with adequate patient sampling are required to confirm the true prevalence.