Chest
-
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been proposed as a useful procedure for bacteriologic diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. To determine the cardiopulmonary effects of this procedure and to identify the patients at risk of poor tolerance, 30 critically ill ventilated patients suspected of having pneumonia were studied. Hemodynamic and gas exchange parameters were continuously recorded using an arterial catheter, a Swan-Ganz catheter with SvO2 display, and a pulse oximeter. ⋯ Two hours after the end of BAL, PaO2 values were still 20 percent lower than pre-BAL values in 40 percent of the patients. We conclude that BAL can be performed safely in most critically ill ventilated patients who have stable hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters. However, none of the recorded parameters allows identification of the patients at risk of poor tolerance of the procedure.
-
To assess cardiovascular effects and the oxygenation status of mechanically ventilated patients undergoing protected specimen brushing (PSB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) under fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). ⋯ We conclude that PSB and BAL under FOB are well tolerated in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic disturbances requiring inotropic or vasopressor agents (or both); however, a modest impairment in arterial oxygenation was observed after the end of the FOB procedure.
-
Case Reports
Increased blood pressure during inverse ratio ventilation in two patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) is increasingly used in the supportive treatment of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. A recent study suggests that IRV reduces cardiac output with minimal effect on mean arterial pressure. We report two cases in which IRV led to reproducible increases in mean arterial pressure. Concomitant hemodynamic measurements suggest that these responses occurred as a result of increased vascular resistance.
-
Acute asthma is a very common medical emergency. Thus, a variety of measures are currently used to assess severity; most are logical and seem reasonably effective but have never been scientifically tested in a comprehensive manner. Additionally, simple brief measures are needed for greater specificity in describing variables and in assessing different aspects of asthma. ⋯ Finally, early response to treatment was the most important predictor of the patient outcome (r = 0.48, p < 0.00). In summary, the results of this study support the hypothesis that most of the subjective and objective measures utilized in the assessment of patients with acute adult asthma represent separate and nonoverlapping dimensions and provided a useful summary of acute asthma. Early response to treatment in combination with measures of the four identified factors could be included in other acute adult asthma research protocols promoting greater comparable among studies.