European journal of preventive cardiology
-
Background Exercise rehabilitation is highly recommended by current guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease, but its implementation is still poor. Many clinicians experience difficulties in prescribing exercise in the presence of different concomitant cardiovascular diseases and risk factors within the same patient. It was aimed to develop a digital training and decision support system for exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease patients in clinical practice: the European Association of Preventive Cardiology Exercise Prescription in Everyday Practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool. ⋯ An algorithm, supported by an interactive tool, was constructed based on these data. This training and decision support system automatically provides an exercise prescription according to the variables provided. Conclusion This digital training and decision support system may contribute in overcoming barriers in exercise implementation in common cardiovascular diseases.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Heart rate and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Background Although high resting heart rates are associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection, the reports for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are conflicting. Design A secondary analysis was conducted in order to examine the relationship between resting heart rate and adverse outcomes in 2705 patients (mean age = 68 ± 10 years; 47% men; 88% white) with HFpEF who were in sinus rhythm from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Methods Baseline heart rate was obtained from baseline electrocardiogram data. ⋯ An increased risk (per 5-beats per minute [bpm] increase) for hospitalisation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.004-1.060), hospitalisation for heart failure (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05-1.15), death (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06-1.16) and cardiovascular death (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07-1.19) was observed. When the analysis was limited to those who did not report the use of β-blockers, the magnitude of the association for each outcome (per 5-bpm increase) was not materially altered (hospitalisation: HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.97-1.09; hospitalisation for heart failure: HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.98-1.27; death: HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05-1.28; cardiovascular death: HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.99-1.27). Conclusion High resting heart rate is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF, and future studies are needed in order to determine whether reducing heart rate improves outcomes in HFpEF.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Risk factors for sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aims To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods Medline and PubMed databases were searched for original articles published in English from 1963 through to December 2015 that included patients under 18 years of age with a primary or secondary end-point of either SCD or SCD-equivalent events (aborted cardiac arrest or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge) or cardiovascular death (CVD). Results Twenty-five studies (3394 patients) met the inclusion criteria. ⋯ Multi-centre prospective studies are needed in order to further determine the relevance of these factors in predicting SCD in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and to identify novel risk markers. Condensed abstract A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical risk factors predicting sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was performed, identifying four 'major' factors: previous adverse cardiac event; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; syncope; and extreme left ventricular hypertrophy. Well-designed multi-centre studies are required in the future in order to confirm these findings.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk.
Aims Cardiovascular fixed-dose combination pills, or polypills, may help address the widespread lack of access and adherence to proven medicines. Initiation of polypill-based care typically entails switching from current separately taken medications. Given the heterogeneity in usual care, there is interest in the impact of polypill treatment across different patterns of prior medication regimen. ⋯ Switching to a polypill-based strategy resulted in estimated cardiovascular relative risk reductions across a wide range of usual care patterns of antiplatelet, statin and BP-lowering therapy prescribing. Conclusion Adherence benefits from switching to a polypill resulted in risk factor changes that were at least as good as usual care across a wide variety of treatment patterns, including equally potent or more potent regimens. The benefits of switching to polypill-based care were greatest among those stepped up from partial treatment or less potent treatment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The haemoglobin glycation index as predictor of diabetes-related complications in the AleCardio trial.
The haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) quantifies the interindividual variation in the propensity for glycation and is a predictor of diabetes complications and adverse effects of intensive glucose lowering. We investigated the relevance of HGI as independent predictor of complications by using data of the AleCardio trial. The AleCardio trial randomized 7226 type 2 diabetes patients with an acute coronary syndrome to aleglitazar or placebo. ⋯ Every percentage increase in HGI was associated with a 16% increase in the risk for cardiovascular mortality ( p = 0.005). The association between HGI and mortality disappeared with additional adjustment for HbA1c. HGI predicts mortality in diabetes patients with acute coronary syndromes, but no better than HbA1c.