The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York
-
Cardiovascular complications following noncardiac surgery constitute an enormous burden of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Annually, more than one million operations are complicated by adverse cardiovascular events, such as perioperative myocardial infarction or death from cardiac causes. In order to combat this problem, cardiac evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery should ask two questions about the patient: What is the risk of cardiac complications during and after surgery? How can that risk be reduced or eliminated? Risk assessment evaluates patients' co-morbidities and exercise tolerance, as well as the type of surgery to be performed, to determine the overall risk of perioperative cardiac complications. ⋯ Noninvasive testing offers only limited assistance in estimating risk for these patients. The best risk reduction strategy for these patients is perioperative beta blockade use. The role of coronary revascularization specifically to reduce perioperative cardiac complications remains unproven.
-
Two years after being diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, a 57-year-old man taking oral mesalamine experienced severe respiratory distress due to left lung pleuropneumonitis. Eight months later, severe respiratory distress recurred due to right lung pneumonitis. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease or mesalamine-induced pulmonary injury were considered in the differential diagnosis, which was complicated by a history of aseptic meningitis and evidence of an ongoing autoimmune response. The implications of the case are discussed.
-
Comparative Study
Correlation between housestaff performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination and standardized patient encounters.
There is interest in the use of "standardized patients" to assist in evaluating medical trainees' clinical skills, which may be difficult to evaluate with written exams alone. Previous studies of the validity of observed structured clinical exams have found low correlation with various written exams as well as with faculty evaluations. Since the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) results are often used by training programs in the selection of applicants, we assessed the correlation between performance on an observed structured clinical exam and the USMLE, steps 1 and 2, for internal medicine housestaff. ⋯ The low correlation between the USMLE and performance on a structured clinical exam suggests that either the written exam is a poor predictor of actual clinical performance, the small window of clinical skills measured by the structured clinical exam is inadequate, or the two methods evaluate different skill sets entirely. Our findings are consistent with previous work finding low correlations between structured clinical exams and accepted common means of evaluation, such as faculty evaluations, other written exams and program director assessments. The medical education community needs to develop an objective, valid method of measuring important, yet subjective, skill-sets such as interpersonal communication, empathy and efficient data collection.
-
The obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a common disorder, estimated to occur in 4% of males and 2% of females in the workforce. This incidence increases with age. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea is responsible for acute and chronic heart disease, but is a readily treatable disorder that is both underdiagnosed and underappreciated in health care. Because the cardiac consequences of untreated sleep apnea are so profound and the treatment relatively simple, the disorder needs to be recognized more frequently.
-
It is important to teach community members about the causes, magnitude and effects of health disparities that affect them, and to partner with them to develop, test and disseminate programs that they can sustain to improve health. East and Central Harlem are two underserved, predominantly minority, inner-city communities whose residents have disproportionately high morbidity and mortality from chronic conditions. We developed an approach to educate and work together with Harlem residents to study health disparities, and to use peer-led classes to improve chronic disease management and outcomes. ⋯ Researchers, clinicians and community leaders worked together to disseminate knowledge about health disparities and a peer-organized education program to address these disparities. This approach provides a foundation to attain a cadre of community-based experts to inform the community about ways to reduce health disparities. By pooling local and academic expertise and resources, we hope to develop programs that are workable, effective and sustainable without outside control or funding.