Anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Use of ketorolac after lower abdominal surgery. Effect on analgesic requirement and surgical outcome.
Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent with opioid-sparing properties. The effect of ketorolac on postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and surgical outcome was evaluated in 198 women after abdominal hysterectomy procedures using a double-blind protocol design. ⋯ The authors conclude that the opioid-sparing effects of ketorolac contributed few clinically significant advantages after abdominal hysterectomy procedures.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The electrophysiologic effects of volatile anesthetics and sufentanil on the normal atrioventricular conduction system and accessory pathways in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
The effects of volatile agents and sufentanil anesthesia on the electrophysiologic properties of the accessory pathway and on the incidence of intraoperative tachyarrhythmias in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome are unknown. Therefore, we studied these agents for their use in patients undergoing ablative procedures or requiring a general anesthetic for other surgeries. ⋯ Sufentanil-lorazepam has no clinically significant effect on the electrophysiologic expression of the accessory pathway. Of the volatile agents, enflurane most, isoflurane next, and halothane least increased refractoriness within the accessory and atrioventricular pathways. Therefore, administration of these volatile agents during ablative procedures may confound interpretation of postablative studies used to determine the success of ablation treatment. Conversely, in patients with preexcitation syndrome requiring general anesthesia for nonablative procedures, volatile agents may reduce the incidence of perioperative tachyarrhythmias because of their effects on refractoriness. Enflurane would be the agent of choice because it increases refractoriness the most without prolonging the coupling interval.
-
Comparative Study
Efficacy of the self-inflating bulb in detecting esophageal intubation. Does the presence of a nasogastric tube or cuff deflation make a difference?
The principle underlying the use of the self-inflating bulb in differentiating esophageal from tracheal intubation is that the trachea is held open by rigid cartilaginous rings, whereas the esophagus collapses when a negative pressure is applied to its lumen. This investigation was designed to test the efficacy of the bulb in detecting esophageal intubation in the presence of a nasogastric tube and after tracheal tube cuff deflation. ⋯ These results confirm that a nasogastric tube or cuff deflation does not interfere with the reliability of the self-inflating bulb in detecting esophageal intubation and thus does not contribute to false positive results. Confirmation of tracheal tube placement by this simple method makes it ideal for use with other recognized methods both in and outside the operating rooms and enables physicians and emergency personnel to proceed with other resuscitative measures.
-
Accurate dosing of propofol in children requires accurate knowledge of propofol pharmacokinetics in this population. Improvement in pharmacokinetic accuracy may depend on the incorporation of individual patient factors into the pharmacokinetic model or the use of population approaches to estimating the pharmacokinetic parameters. We investigated whether incorporating individual subject covariates (e.g., age, weight, and gender) into the pharmacokinetic model improved the accuracy. We also investigated whether the use of a mixed-effects population model (e.g., the computer program NONMEM) improved the accuracy of the pharmacokinetic model beyond the accuracy obtained with models estimated using two simple approaches. ⋯ The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children are well described by a standard three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Weight-adjusting the volumes and clearances significantly improved the accuracy of the pharmacokinetics. Adjusting the pharmacokinetics for inclusion of additional patient covariates or using a mixed-effects model did not further improve the ability of the pharmacokinetic parameters to describe the observations.
-
Clinically, epidural coadministration of opioids and local anesthetics has provided excellent analgesia for various types of pain. However, information about the interaction of these drugs when administered epidurally is limited. Therefore, we evaluated the antinociceptive interaction between morphine and lidocaine on both somatic and visceral noxious stimuli in the rat. ⋯ These data demonstrate that epidurally coadministered morphine and lidocaine produce synergistic analgesia and prolong the duration of analgesia in tests of somatic and of visceral nociception.