Anesthesiology
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.
Perioperative central neuraxial analgesia may improve outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery due to attenuation of stress response and superior analgesia. ⋯ There were no differences in the rates of mortality or myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting with central neuraxial analgesia. There were associated improvements in faster time until tracheal extubation, decreased pulmonary complications and cardiac dysrhythmias, and reduced pain scores.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Sciatic nerve block via posterior Labat approach is more efficient than lateral popliteal approach using a double-injection technique: a prospective, randomized comparison.
For peripheral nerve blockade, the double-injection technique proved to be superior to a single injection in previous investigations. The current study was designed to compare onset time and efficacy of two different double-injection approaches for sciatic nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine. ⋯ A double injection with a relatively low volume of 0.75% ropivacaine generated a higher success rate and a shorter onset time of sensory and motor blockade after the classic Labat approach than after a lateral popliteal approach.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries.
General anesthesia (GA) and brachial plexus block have been used successfully for surgery on the upper extremities. Controversy exists as to which method is more suitable in outpatients undergoing hand and wrist surgery. The authors hypothesized that infraclavicular brachial plexus block (INB) performed with a short-acting local anesthetic would result in shorter time to discharge home as compared with "fast-track" GA. ⋯ Infraclavicular brachial plexus block with a short-acting local anesthetic was associated with time-efficient anesthesia, faster recovery, fewer adverse events, better analgesia, and greater patient acceptance than GA followed by wound infiltration with a local anesthetic in outpatients undergoing hand and wrist surgery.