Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffects on biliary tract pressure in humans of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine compared with morphine and placebo.
This study compared the effect of ketorolac tromethamine with that of morphine and placebo on biliary tract pressure. Intraoperatively, 31 anesthetized patients received either ketorolac (30 mg IV, n = 16) or morphine (5 mg IV, n = 15) after a cholecystectomy or gallstone removal. Intrabiliary tract pressure was measured 5 min after dosing. ⋯ In the morphine group, there was significant increase in pressure over baseline. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between ketorolac and placebo. We conclude that ketorolac has little or no effect on biliary tract dynamics; therefore, ketorolac may be a logical choice for analgesia in those situations in which spasm of the biliary tract is undesirable.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffects of ketorolac and bupivacaine on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy.
The effects of intraarticular bupivacaine, systemic ketorolac, and a combination of both treatments on postoperative pain and mobilization were evaluated in 60 healthy outpatients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under general anesthesia. After induction of anesthesia, patients received 2 mL of either ketorolac (60 mg) or saline solution (1 mL IV and 1 mL IM). On completion of surgery, the patient's knee joint was injected with 30 mL of either 0.5% bupivacaine or saline solution, according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. ⋯ Similarly, there were no differences in the times to ambulation or discharge or in analgesic requirements at home. In conclusion, a combination of systemic ketorolac and intraarticular bupivacaine decreased analgesic requirements and pain on awakening after arthroscopic surgery. However, the use of ketorolac alone or in combination with bupivacaine offered no advantage over bupivacaine alone with respect to recovery times after outpatient arthroscopy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEsmolol is more effective than sodium nitroprusside in reducing blood loss during orthognathic surgery.
The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of esmolol and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) as primary drugs for producing controlled hypotension and limiting blood loss during orthognathic surgery. Thirty ASA physical status I and II patients (mean age 22 yr) undergoing LeFort I maxillary osteotomies were randomly assigned to receive either esmolol (n = 15) or SNP (n = 15) as the primary drug to induce hypotension. ⋯ The mean arterial blood pressure during the hypotensive period was 58.7 +/- 0.7 (mean +/- SEM) and 61.8 +/- 0.4 mm Hg for esmolol and SNP, respectively (P less than 0.001). In addition, 40% +/- 4% of the observed values in the esmolol group and 53% +/- 3% in the SNP group were outside the target range for mean arterial blood pressure (difference significant at P less than 0.05), and a greater proportion of the deviations were above 65 mm Hg in the SNP group than in the esmolol group (0.64 vs 0.46, respectively, P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialContinuous interpleural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after surgery with flank incisions: a double-blind comparison of 0.25% and 0.5% solutions.
Postoperative analgesia, as assessed by visual analogue scale scores (0-10) and patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements, pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and plasma bupivacaine concentrations were studied in patients receiving interpleural blockade with bupivacaine after surgery with a flank incision. Two groups of 10 patients received either 0.5% or 0.25% bupivacaine, both with epinephrine (5 micrograms/mL). Pain relief was initiated when patients had visual analogue scale scores greater than or equal to 4. ⋯ Patient-controlled analgesia morphine use was also similar in the 0.25% (21.3 +/- 14.6 mg) and 0.5% (21.0 +/- 16.0 mg) groups (mean +/- SD). In both groups, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved significantly within 60 min (P less than 0.05). Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 h were higher (P less than 0.001) in the 0.5% group (Cmax, 1.47 +/- 0.37 micrograms/mL; AUC, 1511 +/- 323 micrograms.mL-1.min) than those in the 0.25% group (Cmax, 0.55 +/- 0.22 micrograms/mL; AUC, 680 +/- 118 micrograms.mL-1.min) (mean +/- SD).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural patient-controlled analgesia: an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain relief after cesarean delivery.
Epidural administration of an opioid analgesic by means of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was compared with conventional intravenous PCA for pain relief after cesarean delivery. One hundred seventeen healthy women were randomly assigned to receive hydromorphone either intravenously (IV-PCA) or epidurally (EPI-PCA) after cesarean delivery with epidural bupivacaine for operative anesthesia. The hydromorphone requirements were 3.4 and 4.2 times more in the IV-PCA group on the first (P less than 0.01) and second (P less than 0.01) postoperative days, respectively. ⋯ Pruritus was reported more frequently in the EPI-PCA (67%) than in the IV-PCA (33%) group. Nausea was experienced by only 10% of patients in the IV-PCA and 6% in the EPI-PCA group. There was no evidence of postoperative respiratory depression, with minimal oxygen saturation values of 93% (+/- 3%) and 94% (+/- 1%) in the IV-PCA and EPI-PCA groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)