Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialForce and torque vary between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades.
Several studies have examined the effects of patient characteristics on force of laryngoscopy, but little attention has been paid to the importance of technique and equipment. This study investigated whether force, torque, head extension, and view varied significantly between laryngoscopists and compared force and torque using Macintosh 3 and Miller 2 blades. The study population consisted of ASA grade I and II patients requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation for elective surgery. ⋯ Thus, laryngoscopic force and torque depend on technique and equipment. Further studies of force and torque may lead to improved techniques. The force-measuring laryngoscope could be a useful tool in teaching laryngoscopy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of intrathecal neostigmine on somatic and visceral pain: improvement by association with a peripheral anticholinergic.
This study was designed to qualitatively evaluate the analgesic actions of intrathecal neostigmine alone and with intravenous (IV) N-butyl-scopolamine on somatic and visceral pain. Twenty-seven patients scheduled for both tubal ligation and vaginoplasty were divided into three groups. Patients received a standard anesthetic with thiopental, atracurium, and N2O/O2/enflurane. ⋯ Patients from the NSG were pain free during all assessment times (P < 0.0001). Neostigmine was more effective for somatic pain than visceral pain. N-butyl-scopolamine administration acted peripherally as an effective complement for treatment of visceral pain, reflecting an association between central cholinergic effects and peripheral anticholinergic effects in the treatment of visceral postoperative pain.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of bolus administration of opioids on cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with supratentorial lesions.
In many studies reporting an increase in cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) after opioid administration, concomitant decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) have been observed. Autoregulatory cerebral vasodilation may therefore have been a factor in the CSFP increases. We tested the hypothesis that increases in CSFP after bolus injection of opioids could be minimized by modifying concomitant decreases in MAP with phenylephrine. ⋯ No significant changes in MAP or CSFP were observed in the saline-treated patients. HR decreased after injection of either study drug (P < 0.01) but remained unchanged in the saline group. In summary, during stable anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen, bolus injections of fentanyl or sufentanil, despite producing rapidly corrected mean decreases in MAP of 18% and 25%, respectively, were not associated with any change in CSFP.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSevoflurane versus isoflurane: induction and recovery characteristics with single-breath inhaled inductions of anesthesia.
Because of its nonpungent odor and low blood-gas solubility coefficient, sevoflurane might be an ideal drug for single-breath inhaled induction of anesthesia. Fifty ASA grade I-III ambulatory surgical patients (18-76 yr old) received a single-breath induction with either 5.0% sevoflurane or 5.0% isoflurane (randomized) in a 1:1 N2O/O2 mixture. Anesthesia was maintained with the same anesthetic in 70% N2O until the end of surgery, when anesthetics were abruptly discontinued. ⋯ Patients opened their eyes at lower end-tidal minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC)-fractions of sevoflurane (0.12 +/- 0.01 MAC) than isoflurane (0.15 +/- 0.01 MAC, P < 0.01). During recovery, patients who received sevoflurane felt less clumsy (P < 0.001) and less confused (P < 0.005) but had higher pain scores (P < 0.005) than those who received isoflurane. Sevoflurane is more suitable than isoflurane for single-breath induction, because it produces a smoother induction with a lower incidence of complications and better patient acceptance.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPrevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of lidocaine with alfentanil.
We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to compare the use of alfentanil 1 mg and lidocaine 40 mg for the reduction of pain during injection of propofol. Eighty-nine patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group L, lidocaine 40 mg added to 180 mg propofol; Group A, alfentanil 1 mg 30 s prior to propofol; or Group P, placebo (normal saline). The incidence of pain in the placebo group was 67%. ⋯ There was no significant difference in the induction dose of propofol between the groups. Fifty-two percent of patients who experienced pain at induction had recall of that pain in the recovery room. Alfentanil 1 mg and lidocaine 40 mg are both effective in reducing pain during injection of propofol.