Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPressure support ventilation augments spontaneous breathing with improved thoracoabdominal synchrony in neonates with congenital heart disease.
In neonates, during spontaneous breathing with demand-type continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high airway resistance caused by small endotracheal tubes, time delay for triggering, and rapid respiratory frequency may result in patient-ventilator asynchrony. Such asynchrony may alter normal breathing patterns and thoracoabdominal synchrony. We, therefore, studied whether pressure support ventilation (PSV) could augment spontaneous breathing and improve synchrony between the rib cage (RC) and the abdominal (AB) motions in nine postoperative neonates with congenital heart disease. Three successive levels of PSV (0, 5, and 10 cm H2O) were used randomly. With increasing levels of PSV, the tidal volume (VT) increased and the respiratory frequency decreased, associated with an increase in minute ventilation. To assess thoracoabdominal synchrony, maximum compartment amplitude (MCA)/VT (MCA = AB + RC) and the phase delay of the RC-to-AB motion during inspiration (the ratio of the time delay to the inspiratory time) were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography. When the motions of the RC and AB were out of phase, MCA/VT exceeded 1.0. MCA/VT decreased significantly from 1.3 +/- 0.3 without PSV to 1.0 +/- 0.0 with PSV of 10 cm H2O. The phase delay and paradoxical motion of the RC observed in seven of the nine cases without PSV also disappeared with PSV of 10 cm H2O. In conclusion, PSV can effectively augment spontaneous breathing with better thoracoabdominal synchrony in neonates. ⋯ Assisting spontaneous ventilation in a neonate is often difficult. Because pressure support ventilation facilitates coordination between the patient and ventilator in adults and children, we thought it might be effective in neonates. Our study supports this conclusion.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Comparative StudyThe Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how does it compare with a "gold standard"?
Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions directed toward the treatment of preoperative anxiety in children has been hindered by the absence of a statistically valid measurement tool. In a previous investigation, we developed an instrument (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale [YPAS]) that can be used to assess anxiety in children undergoing induction of anesthesia. The purpose of the present investigation was to modify and expand the applicability of the instrument to the preoperative holding area and to validate the modified instrument (m-YPAS) against a recognized "gold standard" (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Childrens [STAIC]). Videotapes of children in a preoperative holding area were analyzed by the investigators. The existing five categories of the YPAS were found to reflect most of the behaviors observed. Several items, however, were modified to describe new behaviors observed. Reliability analysis using weighted kappa statistics revealed that inter-observer agreement ranged from 0.68 to 0.86, whereas intraobserver weighted kappa ranged from 0.63 to 0.90. Concurrent validity between the YPAS and the STAIC was acceptable (P = 0.01, r = 0.79). Construct validity was high as assessed by increased m-YPAS scores from the preoperative holding area (28 +/- 8) to entering the operating room (35 +/- 12), to introduction of the anesthesia mask (43 +/- 15;F [1,36] = 0.6, P = 0.001]. Showing good to excellent observer reliability and high concurrent and construct validity, the m-YPAS proved to be an appropriate tool for assessing children's anxiety during the perioperative period. ⋯ The absence of a statistically valid measurement tool that can be applied easily in perioperative settings hinders the evaluation of interventions directed toward treatment of preoperative anxiety in children. The authors describe the development of such a tool, the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTransfusion of autologous, hydroxyethyl starch-cryopreserved red blood cells.
In this prospective, randomized study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of the transfusion of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) cryopreserved red blood cells (RBC) compared with the transfusion of liquid-stored RBC in patients undergoing major orthopedic or urologic surgery. Thirty-six patients donated autologous blood 35 +/- 6 days before elective surgery. Only the first of 3.5 +/- 1.3 donated units of RBC was randomly assigned to be stored in the liquid state at 4 degrees C in phosphate/adenine/guanosine/glucose/saline-Mannitol or frozen below -130 degrees C by means of liquid nitrogen after the addition of HES (molecular weight 200,000 Dalton, degree of substitution 0.5, final concentration 11.5% wt/wt) as a cryoprotectant. After induction of anesthesia, patients donated 900 mL of autologous blood before they received one unit of liquid-stored RBC in Group 1. In Group 2, one unit of cryopreserved autologous RBC was transfused after removal of the cryoprotectant HES. In Group 3, patients received one unit of cryopreserved RBC without any manipulation after thawing. Patients in Groups 1 and 2 received additional 500 mL of 10% HES. Hemodynamic variables, arterial blood gases, plasma hemoglobin, and arterial lactate concentrations were measured after the induction of anesthesia, after hemodilution, and at 10-min intervals after transfusion of the respective RBC concentrate over a period of 40 min. Skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension was measured in the quadriceps muscle using an automatically stepwise-driven oxygen partial pressure electrode. We found no differences among groups concerning demographics, arterial blood gas values, and lactate concentrations and observed no adverse reactions after transfusion of the conventionally stored or cryopreserved RBC. Hemodynamic variables did not differ among groups, with the exception of an increased mean arterial blood pressure after the transfusion of cryopreserved unwashed RBC. In all groups, the skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension remained constant after hemodilution and increased after transfusion of either washed or unwashed cryopreserved RBC. Although the free plasma hemoglobin concentration remained constant after the transfusion of liquid-stored RBC (26 +/- 8 mg/dL), the plasma hemoglobin concentration increased twofold after the transfusion of cryopreserved washed RBC (60 +/- 12 mg/dL) and threefold after transfusion of cryopreserved unwashed RBC (98 +/- 20 mg/dL). The authors conclude that transfusion of one unit of RBC after cryopreservation with HES is safe and well tolerated by patients. Intravascular volume replacement and skeletal muscle oxygenation characteristics by erythrocytes did not differ between liquid-stored and cryopreserved RBC. ⋯ This study examined whether a colloid should be used to store blood. Our data suggest that the transfusion of one unit of red blood cells after cryopreservation with hydroxyethyl starch is safe and well tolerated by patients. The effects of intravascular volume replacement and skeletal muscle oxygenation provided by red blood cells after liquid storage or cryopreservation were not different.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEltanolone as an alternative to propofol for ambulatory anesthesia.
The intravenous (i.v.) steroid anesthetic, eltanolone, compares favorably to propofol with respect to its induction characteristics. This double-blind investigation was designed to compare the induction and recovery profile of eltanolone (versus propofol) when it was used for both induction and maintenance of ambulatory anesthesia. Eighty-three consenting ASA physical status I-III outpatients undergoing minor gynecologic or urologic procedures lasting 10-40 min were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic treatment groups. All patients received midazolam, 2 mg i.v., and fentanyl, 50 micrograms i.v., before induction of anesthesia. The control group (Group 1) was induced with propofol, 2.4 mg/kg i.v. (18-60 yr or ASA physical status I or II) or 1.6 mg/kg i.v. (61-80 yr and/or ASA physical status III), followed by intermittent bolus doses of 0.6 mg/kg i.v. in combination with N2O 67% for maintenance of anesthesia. In Group 2, anesthesia was induced with eltanolone, 0.75 mg/kg i.v., (18-60 yr and/or ASA physical status I or II) or 0.5 mg/kg i.v. (61-80 yr and/or ASA physical status III), and maintained with intermittent bolus injections of 0.2 mg/kg i.v. and N2O 67%. Group 3 received eltanolone, 1.0 mg/kg i.v. (18-60 yr and/or ASA physical status I or II), or 0.75 mg/kg i.v. (61-80 yr and/or ASA physical status III), followed by intermittent bolus injections of 0.2 mg/kg i.v. and N2O 67%. In addition to recording the induction and recovery times and side effects, psychomotor testing was performed before and at 30-min intervals after anesthesia. Induction times (57 +/- 23, 67 +/- 26, and 61 +/- 22s, respectively) were similar in all three groups. Although eltanolone produced no pain on injection (versus 52% in the propofol group), 10% of the eltanolone-treated patients (versus none in the propofol group) developed transient cutaneous (rash-like) reactions. The total dose of study medication used during the anesthetic period was 9.2 +/- 3.7 mg.kg-1.h-1 in the propofol group compared with 3.3 +/- 1.4 mg.kg-1.h-1 and 3.3 +/- 1.9 mg.kg-1.h-1 in Groups 2 and 3, respectively. Early recovery times were significantly shorter after propofol anesthesia. However, times to ambulation, micturition, and being judged "fit for discharge," as well as recovery of cognitive function, were similar in all three groups. Although ethanolone seems to be a safe and effective i.v. anesthetic, these data suggest that it is unlikely to replace propofol in the ambulatory setting. ⋯ Eltanolone is an investigational steroid anesthetic that causes less pain on injection and less cardiovascular depression than propofol (the most widely used intravenous anesthetic in the outpatient setting). Unfortunately, emergence from anesthesia after ambulatory surgery is slower with eltanolone compared with propofol. Therefore, it is unlikely that eltanolone will replace propofol for outpatient anesthesia.