Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSmall-dose hypobaric lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for short duration outpatient laparoscopy. I. A randomized comparison with conventional dose hyperbaric lidocaine.
A randomized, single-blind trial of two spinal anesthetic solutions for outpatient laparoscopy was conducted to compare intraoperative conditions and postoperative recovery. Thirty women (ASA physical status I and II) were assigned to one of two groups. Group I patients received a small-dose hypobaric solution of 1% lidocaine 25 mg made up to 3 mL by the addition of fentanyl 25 micrograms. ⋯ On follow-up, 96% said they found spinal needle insertion acceptable, 93% found surgery comfortable, and 90% said they would request spinal anesthesia for laparoscopy in future. Overall, this study found spinal anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy to have high patient acceptance and a comparable complication rate to other studies. The small-dose hypobaric lidocaine-fentanyl technique has advantages over conventional-dose hyperbaric lidocaine of no hypotension and faster recovery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of reversal of neuromuscular blockade on autonomic control in the perioperative period.
Impaired parasympathetic control of heart rate is associated with increased incidence of cardiac dysrhythmias and ischemia. Anticholinergic drugs suppress parasympathetic control and could be detrimental in the early postoperative period in high-risk patients. In this double-blind randomized trial, 30 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing minor surgery received either atropine 20 micrograms/kg and neostigmine 50 micrograms/kg (Group A), glycopyrrolate 8 micrograms/kg and neostigmine 50 micrograms/kg (Group G), or placebo (Group P) for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. ⋯ Groups A and G showed a borderline decrease in normalized high-frequency variability at 2 h (P = 0.05 for Groups A and G versus Group P). Anticholinergic drugs with neostigmine cause impairment of parasympathetic control of heart rate which persists into the early postoperative period. The effects of glycopyrrolate appear to be of shorter duration; this drug may thus be preferable in patients at risk of cardiovascular complications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialHemodynamic effects, myocardial ischemia, and timing of tracheal extubation with propofol-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery.
Recent interest in earlier tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has focused attention on the potential benefits of a propofol-based technique. We randomized 124 patients (34 with poor ventricular function) undergoing CABG surgery to receive either a propofol-based (5 mg.kg-1.h-1 prior to sternotomy, 3 mg.kg-1. h-1 thereafter; n = 58) or enflurane-based (0.2%-1.0%, n = 66) anesthetic. Induction of anesthesia consisted of fentanyl 15 micrograms/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously in both groups. ⋯ Patients receiving propofol were extubated earlier (median 9.1 h versus 12.3 h, P = 0.006), although there was no difference in time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (both 22 h, P = 0.54). Both groups had similar hemodynamic changes throughout (all P > 0.10), as well as metaraminol (P = 0.49) and inotrope requirements (P > 0.10), intraoperative myocardial ischemia (P = 0.12) and perioperative myocardial infarction (P = 0.50). The results of this trial suggest that a propofol-based anesthetic, when compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic requiring additional dosing of fentanyl and midazolam for CPB, can lead to a significant reduction in time to extubation after CABG surgery, without adverse hemodynamic effects, increased risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction.