Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSingle-dose ondansetron prevents postoperative vomiting in pediatric outpatients.
This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg to 4 mg intravenously) compared with placebo in the prevention of postoperative vomiting in 429 ASA status I-III children 1-12 yr old undergoing outpatient surgery under nitrous oxide- and halothane-based general anesthesia. The results show that during both the 2-h and the 24-h evaluation periods after discontinuation of nitrous oxide, a significantly greater percentage of ondansetron-treated patients (2 h 89%, 24 h 68%) compared with placebo-treated patients (2 h 71%, 24 h 40%) experienced complete response (i.e., no emetic episodes, not rescued, and not withdrawn; P < 0.001 at both time points). Ondansetron-treated patients reached criteria for home readiness one-half hour sooner than placebo-treated patients (P < 0.05). The age of the child, use of intraoperative opioids, type of surgery, and requirement to tolerate fluids before discharge may also have affected the incidence of postoperative emesis during the 0- to 24-h observation period. Use of postoperative opioids did not have any effect on complete response rates in this patient population. We conclude that the prophylactic use of ondansetron reduces postoperative emesis in pediatric patients, regardless of the operant influential factors. ⋯ Postoperative nausea and vomiting often occur after surgery and general anesthesia in children and are the major reason for unexpected hospital admission after ambulatory surgery. Our study demonstrates that the prophylactic use of a small dose of ondansetron reduces postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMaternal experience during epidural or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a prospective, randomized trial.
Epidural anesthesia (EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) are popular anesthetic techniques for elective cesarean section. A randomized, blind study was conducted to compare maternal experiences during these regional anesthetics. EA was established using alkalinized 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and fentanyl, whereas spinal anesthesia was performed using 2.5 mL hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl via a single-space CSEA approach. Both patients and observers were blinded to the anesthetic technique allocation. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled; 6 were withdrawn (Group EA, n = 55; Group CSEA, n = 59). Of the two techniques, CSEA was associated with earlier onset times (P < 0.001), more intense motor block (P < 0.05), and greater ephedrine use (P < 0.01). Anxiety was significantly lower (P < 0.05) and satisfaction was higher (P < 0.05) before starting surgery with CSEA. Pain scores were lower pre- and intraoperatively with CSEA, a difference that became significant during block placement and at delivery (P < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the incidence or severity of hypotension and nausea or analgesic supplementation rate; or for postoperative assessments of intraoperative pain, anxiety and satisfaction, and postpartum backache and headache. We conclude that maternal conditions and experience were good with both methods, although CSEA conferred several minor advantages. ⋯ Epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia are often used for elective cesarean sections. Although the combined spinal-epidural anesthetic technique conferred minor advantages, both techniques were associated with low anesthetic failure rates, good operative conditions, and high maternal satisfaction levels.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEmergence of elderly patients from prolonged desflurane, isoflurane, or propofol anesthesia.
Recovery from prolonged anesthesia might be compromised in elderly patients. Desflurane (DES) may be particularly well suited to achieve a rapid postoperative recovery because of its low lipid solubility. Postoperative recovery was compared in 45 elderly patients randomized to receive either DES, isoflurane (ISO), or propofol (PRO) to maintain anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with PRO, vecuronium, and fentanyl and maintained with N2O, fentanyl, and the study drug. Times from end of anesthesia to tracheal extubation, eye opening and hand squeezing on command, and ability to state name and date of birth were recorded. Sedation and psychometric evaluation were tested 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 24 h postoperatively. Results are given as means +/- SD. Differences among were analyzed by chi2 or analysis of variance. P < 0.05 compared with DES was considered significant. After a prolonged anesthesia (199 +/- 57 min with DES), immediate recovery times were significantly shorter with DES than with ISO or PRO (times to eye opening: 5.6 +/- 3.4 min, 11.5 +/- 8.4 min, and 11.9 +/- 7.6 min; times to extubation: 6.9 +/- 3 min, 13.1 +/- 8.9 min, 9.9 +/- 6.5 min for DES, ISO, and PRO, respectively). Intermediate recovery, as measured by psychometric testing, sedation levels, and time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit, was similar in the three groups. In this study, DES provided a transient advantage compared with ISO or PRO with respect to early recovery after prolonged general anesthesia in elderly patients. ⋯ Recovery from prolonged anesthesia can sometimes be problematic in elderly patients. We evaluated 45 elderly patients who received either desflurane, isoflurane, or propofol for anesthesia. We found that desflurane provided a transient advantage in terms of postoperative recovery, but whether this difference is clinically important remains to be demonstrated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of light wand and suspension laryngoscopic intubation techniques in outpatients.
Endotracheal intubation can produce postoperative sore throat and hoarseness, as well as changes in cardiovascular variables. A major goal of ambulatory surgery is the prompt return of patients to their daily activities. Postoperative sore throat may impede this and may decrease patient satisfaction with their anesthetic and surgical experience. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in 40 outpatients having lower extremity arthroscopies to compare the effects of direct laryngoscopy and light wand intubation on cardiovascular changes, sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia. Subjects were randomly assigned to either Group A (endotracheal intubation by rigid laryngoscopy) or Group B (endotracheal intubation with a light wand). A standardized anesthetic technique was used. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before induction, after induction but before endotracheal intubation, and at 1-min intervals for the first 5 min after intubation. Sixteen to twenty-four hours postoperatively, the incidence and severity of sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia was assessed by a follow-up phone call. This study demonstrated no clinically significant difference in cardiovascular variables between the two techniques. Patients had a significantly lower incidence and severity of sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia when a light wand was used for intubation. In conclusion, this study suggests that light wand intubation may decrease the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia, thereby potentially increasing satisfaction in ambulatory surgical patients. ⋯ This prospective, randomized study found that the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and difficulty in swallowing among ambulatory surgical patients is more frequent when they are endotracheally intubated with a rigid laryngoscope than with a light wand. The authors, therefore, recommend more frequent use of the light wand for endotracheal intubation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffects of oxygenation during selective lobar versus total lung collapse with or without continuous positive airway pressure.
Hypoxemia is common during anesthesia with one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study tested the hypothesis that selective lobar blockade would result in higher PaO2 values compared with those found with total lung collapse independent of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) application. Thirty patients undergoing lobectomy were randomly assigned to one of four groups with the following maneuvers during OLV: Group 1 (n = 8) total lung collapse (TLC) plus 5 cm H2O of CPAP to the nonventilated operative lung for 15 mins, followed by selective lobe collapse plus 5 cm H2O of CPAP (during selective collapse only the surgical lobe was collapsed and the rest of that lung was ventilated); Group 2 (n = 6) selective lobar collapse plus 5 cm H2O of CPAP to the operative lung, followed by TLC plus 5 cm H2O of CPAP; Group 3 (n = 8) total lung collapse without CPAP, followed by selective lobe collapse and no CPAP; Group 4 (n = 8) selective lobe collapse without CPAP, followed by TLC and no CPAP. To obtain selective lobe collapse, the bronchial blocker of the Univent (Vitaid, Lewiston, NY) endotracheal tube was guided into the operative bronchus with the aid of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial blood gas measurements were obtained during the following times: Time 1--while the patient was awake; Time 2--two-lung ventilation (2LV) in the supine position; Time 3--after 30 min of OLV in the lateral decubitus position (no CPAP or selective blockade); Time 4 and Time 5--during maneuvers described above (see group description); Time 6--2LV resumed; Time 7--30 min after extubation. Twenty-eight patients completed the study. There were no differences among groups with regard to arterial blood pressure, heart rate, or arterial oxygen saturation during the experimental maneuvers. All four groups showed a decrease in PaO2 from 2LV to OLV (P < 0.05). Both with and without CPAP application, oxygenation was improved with selective lobe collapse compared with TLC. When selective lobe collapse with 5 cm H2O of CPAP followed TLC (group 1), PaO2 values increased to values similar to those found for 2LV (PaO2 449 +/- 122 vs 394 +/- 105 mm Hg). This study indicates that by using a bronchial blocker, changing from total lung collapse to selective lobar blockade improves PaO2 during lung surgery. ⋯ This study examines how oxygen tension in arterial blood can be higher during one-lung ventilation. The use of a bronchial blocker, which changes a total lung collapse to selective lobar blockade, improves oxygenation during lung surgery.