Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Pneumoperitoneum as a risk factor for endobronchial intubation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Patients undergoing gynecological surgery under laparoscopic guidance usually receive general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The creation of a pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position, both of which are used to improve visualization, are associated with cephalad movement of the diaphragm. This may increase the risk of endobronchial intubation. We studied the change in the distance from the tip of the endotracheal tube (ETT) to the carina with a fiberoptic bronchoscope in 30 patients aged 21-40 yr who were undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation (n = 28) or hysterectomy (n = 2). Measurements were taken in the supine and Trendelenburg positions before and after pneumoperitoneum. The average distance from the ETT to the carina in the supine position was 2.1 +/- 0.8 cm and in the Trendelenburg position was 1.8 +/- 0.8 cm (P = not significant). After insufflation of the abdominal cavity, the mean distance decreased to 0.7 +/- 1.4 cm in the supine position (P < 0.05) and was associated with endobronchial intubation in eight patients. The addition of the Trendelenburg position to an established pneumoperitoneum resulted in minimal displacement (0.54 +/- 1.4 cm, P < 0.05) and one additional endobronchial intubation. We conclude that the insufflation of gas in the abdominal cavity, and not the change in patient position, is the main risk factor for endobronchial intubation in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. ⋯ This study demonstrated that in anesthetized women, the insufflation of gas into the abdomen during laparoscopy for gynecologic surgery is the main risk factor for migration of the endotracheal tube into a bronchus.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural administration of the racemates.
We investigated the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural injection of the racemate of each drug into six surgical patients. After epidural administration of either bupivacaine/HCl (115 mg) or mepivacaine/HCl (460 mg), blood samples were collected for 24 h. Unbound fractions were determined by using ultrafiltration for bupivacaine and equilibrium dialysis for mepivacaine. Concentrations in plasma, ultrafiltrate, and dialysate were determined by using stereoselective high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak plasma concentrations of R(+)-bupivacaine (389 +/- 93 ng/mL) and R(-)-mepivacaine (1350 +/- 430 ng/mL) were smaller than those of S(-)-bupivacaine (449 +/- 109 ng/mL, P < 0.0001) and S(+)-mepivacaine (1740 +/- 490 ng/mL, P < 0.002), respectively. However, the unbound peak concentrations of R(+)-bupivacaine (20 +/- 11 ng/mL) were larger than those of S(-)-bupivacaine (15 +/- 9 ng/mL, P < 0.005); unbound peak concentrations of R(-)-mepivacaine (485 +/- 158 ng/mL) and S(+)-mepivacaine (460 +/- 139 ng/mL) did not differ. These observations reflect differences in the systemic disposition (distribution and elimination) of the enantiomers, because the systemic absorption was not enantioselective with either drug. This study supports the opinion that the use of single enantiomers, rather than racemates, is preferable, particularly for bupivacaine. ⋯ Measurements of the plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of bupivacaine and mepivacaine after epidural administration of the racemates demonstrated that the systemic disposition, but not the systemic absorption, of these drugs is enantioselective and supports the opinion that the use of single enantiomers, rather than racemates, is preferable.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Propofol and thiopental in a 1:1 volume mixture is chemically stable.
Propofol and thiopental have been used clinically in combination for induction of anesthesia. Studies suggest that this mixture has synergistic activity, recovery characteristics similar to propofol alone, and bactericidal effects on multiple organisms. It may therefore be both clinically useful and cost-effective. In this study, we examined the chemical stability of this mixture. We used high-performance liquid chromatography to quantify the concentration of both propofol and thiopental in a given sample. This technique allows the detection of loss in total drug mass and of the appearance of breakdown products resulting from drug interaction. Ten samples of a 1:1 mixture by volume were prepared and assayed at Time 0 and Days 1, 3, and 7. Half the samples were incubated at 23 degrees C and the rest were stored at 4 degrees C. Other mixtures were assayed before and after filtration at Time 0 and Days 1 and 7 after storage at 23 degrees C. The assay was able to measure accurately the quantity of drug present in the samples. There was no significant decrease in the quantities of either propofol or thiopental in the mixture over the 7-day period. We conclude that the 1:1 volume mixture of propofol and thiopental is chemically stable for 1 wk at room temperature. ⋯ A mixture of propofol and thiopental has been used to induce anesthesia. We investigated the chemical stability of this mixture using high-performance liquid chromatography and found it to be stable for at least 24 h.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Postoperative ileus is a concern among surgical patients. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia with local anesthetics can decrease the duration of ileus. Significant systemic absorption of local anesthesia occurs during epidural use. In this study, we examined whether many of the beneficial effects on bowel function seen with epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is given parenterally. Forty patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied with one half of the patients receiving a lidocaine bolus (1.5 mg/kg) and infusion (3 mg/min, unless weight <70 kg, then 2 mg/min); the other half received a saline infusion. A blind observer recorded the patient's daily pain score, the time the patient first experienced flatulence and had the first bowel movement, and the total use of analgesics. Lidocaine-treated patients first experienced flatulence in a significantly shorter time (P < 0.01) than control patients. Lidocaine patients' hospital stay was also significantly shorter (P < 0.05); on average, they spent 1.1 fewer days in the hospital. I.V. lidocaine initiated before anesthesia and continued 1 h postoperatively significantly sped up the return of bowel function. Lidocaine patients were also more comfortable postoperatively. Many of the bowel function benefits attributed to epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is administered parenterally. Additionally, the length of hospital stay was reduced in lidocaine-treated patients. ⋯ This study prospectively examined whether I.V. lidocaine could affect the return of bowel function after radical prostate surgery. Lidocaine-treated patients had shorter hospital stays, less pain, and faster return of bowel function. In this population, lidocaine infusion can be a useful adjunct in anesthetic management.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe analgesic effect of fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, and lidocaine in the peripheral veins: a comparative study.
Using venous retention with a tourniquet (70 mm Hg), we performed a randomized, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of I.V. pretreatment with fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, or lidocaine in reducing propofol injection pain. Immediately after venous occlusion with a tourniquet, I.V. fentanyl 150 microg (Group A, n = 35), morphine 4 mg (Group B, n = 35), meperidine 40 mg (Group C, n = 35), 2% lidocaine 3 mL (Group D, n = 35), or normal saline 3 mL (Group E, n = 35; as placebo control) was given to adult patients. The venous retention of the drug was maintained for 1 min, followed by tourniquet release and I.V. administration of propofol 100 mg. Pain assessment was made immediately after the propofol injection. Lidocaine and meperidine significantly reduced propofol injection pain more than placebo (P < 0.05), but there were more side effects in the meperidine group. Fentanyl and morphine reduced the intensity of propofol injection pain (P < 0.05) and had some effect in reducing the incidence of propofol injection pain, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The order of efficacy was lidocaine approximately meperidine > morphine approximately fentanyl. We postulate that the peripheral analgesic effect of these opioid is due to their local anesthetic activity. ⋯ Propofol, a commonly used anesthetic, often causes pain on injection. Given as venous retention pretreatments 1 min before propofol, meperidine and lidocaine were found to significantly reduce the propofol injection pain, whereas fentanyl and morphine only slightly reduced the propofol injection pain.