Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Postoperative ileus is a concern among surgical patients. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia with local anesthetics can decrease the duration of ileus. Significant systemic absorption of local anesthesia occurs during epidural use. In this study, we examined whether many of the beneficial effects on bowel function seen with epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is given parenterally. Forty patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were studied with one half of the patients receiving a lidocaine bolus (1.5 mg/kg) and infusion (3 mg/min, unless weight <70 kg, then 2 mg/min); the other half received a saline infusion. A blind observer recorded the patient's daily pain score, the time the patient first experienced flatulence and had the first bowel movement, and the total use of analgesics. Lidocaine-treated patients first experienced flatulence in a significantly shorter time (P < 0.01) than control patients. Lidocaine patients' hospital stay was also significantly shorter (P < 0.05); on average, they spent 1.1 fewer days in the hospital. I.V. lidocaine initiated before anesthesia and continued 1 h postoperatively significantly sped up the return of bowel function. Lidocaine patients were also more comfortable postoperatively. Many of the bowel function benefits attributed to epidural lidocaine are also present when the drug is administered parenterally. Additionally, the length of hospital stay was reduced in lidocaine-treated patients. ⋯ This study prospectively examined whether I.V. lidocaine could affect the return of bowel function after radical prostate surgery. Lidocaine-treated patients had shorter hospital stays, less pain, and faster return of bowel function. In this population, lidocaine infusion can be a useful adjunct in anesthetic management.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSubhypnotic doses of propofol do not relieve pruritus induced by intrathecal morphine after cesarean section.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether subhypnotic doses of propofol effectively relieve pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery. Twenty-nine women who developed pruritus after undergoing an elective cesarean section and receiving intrathecal morphine (0.25 mg) for postoperative analgesia were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, double-blind study. The women were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mL of propofol (n = 17) or 1 mL of placebo (n = 12) I.V. Pruritus was evaluated 5 min after treatment. In the absence of successful treatment, the women received another 1 mL of the same drug. Pruritus was again evaluated 5 min after the second dose. We found that pruritus was successfully treated twice in the propofol group and once in the placebo group (P = not significant). The antipruritic action of propofol lasted for up to 6 h in one woman and 15 min in the other. The one success in the placebo group lasted for 15 min. We conclude that the success rate of propofol in treating pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery is not significantly different from that of placebo. ⋯ Pruritus is a common and bothersome side effect of neuraxial opioids after cesarean section. Subhypnotic doses of I.V. propofol (10 mg) have been used to treat pruritus caused by neuraxial opioids. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we found that propofol does not relieve pruritus in women who underwent cesarean section and received intrathecal morphine sulfate (0.25 mg) for postoperative pain relief.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe analgesic effect of fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, and lidocaine in the peripheral veins: a comparative study.
Using venous retention with a tourniquet (70 mm Hg), we performed a randomized, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of I.V. pretreatment with fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, or lidocaine in reducing propofol injection pain. Immediately after venous occlusion with a tourniquet, I.V. fentanyl 150 microg (Group A, n = 35), morphine 4 mg (Group B, n = 35), meperidine 40 mg (Group C, n = 35), 2% lidocaine 3 mL (Group D, n = 35), or normal saline 3 mL (Group E, n = 35; as placebo control) was given to adult patients. The venous retention of the drug was maintained for 1 min, followed by tourniquet release and I.V. administration of propofol 100 mg. Pain assessment was made immediately after the propofol injection. Lidocaine and meperidine significantly reduced propofol injection pain more than placebo (P < 0.05), but there were more side effects in the meperidine group. Fentanyl and morphine reduced the intensity of propofol injection pain (P < 0.05) and had some effect in reducing the incidence of propofol injection pain, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The order of efficacy was lidocaine approximately meperidine > morphine approximately fentanyl. We postulate that the peripheral analgesic effect of these opioid is due to their local anesthetic activity. ⋯ Propofol, a commonly used anesthetic, often causes pain on injection. Given as venous retention pretreatments 1 min before propofol, meperidine and lidocaine were found to significantly reduce the propofol injection pain, whereas fentanyl and morphine only slightly reduced the propofol injection pain.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
The effect of halothane and sevoflurane on fatigue-induced changes in hamster diaphragmatic contractility.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of halothane and sevoflurane on fatigue-induced changes in diaphragmatic contractility. Forty-two hamster diaphragm strips were randomly allocated according to anesthetics (no anesthesia control, 1%-3% halothane, 2%-6% sevoflurane) and stimulated directly in an organ bath. Under the influence of the anesthetics, muscle fatigue was induced by repetitive tetanic contraction, and diaphragmatic contractilities (i.e., peak twitch and tetanic tension, twitch contraction time, and half-relaxation time) were measured before and after fatigue. Neither halothane nor sevoflurane changed tension generation before or after fatigue, but each anesthetic significantly enhanced fatigue-induced prolongations of the contraction time and half-relaxation time after fatigue. Specifically, the half-relaxation times after fatigue in the 3% halothane, 4% sevoflurane, and 6% sevoflurane groups (225.6 +/- 37.6, 236.0 +/- 76.5, and 287.3 +/- 55.5 ms, respectively) were more than twice as long as those of the control group (104.7 +/- 19.7 ms, P < 0.05). We conclude that halothane and sevoflurane augment fatigue-induced prolongations of the contraction and relaxation times. Diaphragmatic function may deteriorate when there is a fatiguing task during the clinical administration of halothane or sevoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ This study implicates diaphragmatic fatigue during anesthesia. An in vitro hamster diaphragm muscle preparation was used to study the effect of halothane and sevoflurane on fatigue-induced change in contractility. Our findings suggest that increased load on the diaphragm during volatile anesthesia may lead to impaired diaphragmatic contractility.