Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialFast-track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol.
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that using the less soluble volatile anesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane, as alternatives to propofol for maintenance of anesthesia facilitates the ability of outpatients to achieve postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria (i.e., fast-track eligibility) on arrival in the PACU after laparoscopic surgery. One hundred-twenty consenting women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. After a standardized induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation sequence, anesthesia was maintained with either desflurane 2%-6%, sevoflurane 0.6%-1.75%, or propofol 50-150 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in combination with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen. Recovery times, postanesthesia recovery scores, and the number and type of therapeutic interventions in the PACU were recorded. Compared with the propofol group, the times to awakening and to achieve a recovery score of 10 were significantly shorter, and the percentage of patients judged fast-track eligible on arrival in the PACU was significantly higher, in the desflurane and sevoflurane groups (90% and 75% vs 26%). In conclusion, compared with propofol, the use of desflurane and sevoflurane for the maintenance of general anesthesia resulted in a higher percentage of patients being judged fast-track eligible after outpatient laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures. ⋯ Bypassing the recovery room by transferring outpatients directly to the step-down unit after ambulatory surgery ("fast-tracking") could result in significant cost-savings. We examined the effects of three different maintenance anesthetics--desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol--on the fast-track eligibility of outpatients after laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery. Compared with propofol, desflurane and sevoflurane resulted in a higher percentage of outpatients being judged eligible for fast-tracking.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialOral clonidine premedication reduces the awakening concentration of isoflurane.
Because clonidine has analgesic and sedative properties, it may influence the awakening concentration or dose of an anesthetic. To investigate the effects of oral clonidine premedication on emergence from isoflurane anesthesia, we studied 61 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing superficial operations. They were randomly allocated to one of three groups according to the dose of clonidine they received: the clonidine-2.5 group (n = 21), clonidine-5 group (n = 20), and control group (n = 20) received approximately 2.5, 5, or 0 microg/kg oral clonidine, respectively, in addition to 20 mg of famotidine 90 min before general anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced by thiamylal 5 mg/kg, and tracheal intubation was facilitated with succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg I.V. Anesthesia was maintained with a 1.1% end-tidal isoflurane concentration and 67% N2O in oxygen, while ventilation was controlled to maintain end-tidal CO2 tension between 33 and 38 mm Hg. After surgery, N2O was discontinued while the end-tidal isoflurane concentration was maintained at 1.1%. After confirming the end-tidal N2O concentration of 0%, isoflurane was discontinued. The end-tidal isoflurane concentration at the time when patients responded to a standardized verbal command to open their eyes was recorded as MAC-Awake. The MAC-Awake values in the clonidine-5 group (0.22% +/- 0.09% [mean +/- SD]) was significantly less than those in the clonidine-2.5 and control groups (0.28% +/- 0.07% and 0.30% +/- 0.07%, respectively, P < 0.05). The wake-up time, from discontinuance of isoflurane until arousal, was longer in the clonidine-2.5 and clonidine-5 groups than in the control group (17.3 +/- 8.0, 16.9 +/- 7.0, and 10.6 +/- 5.3 min, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, oral clonidine premedication 5 microg/kg decreases the awakening concentration of isoflurane, and arousal from isoflurane anesthesia is prolonged with oral clonidine in a dose of 2.5-5 microg/kg. ⋯ Preanesthetic medication with oral clonidine, 2.5-5 microg/kg, is associated with prolonged recovery from isoflurane anesthesia in adults.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting.
Although ondansetron (4 mg I.V.) is effective in the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ambulatory surgery, the optimal timing of its administration, the cost-effectiveness, the cost-benefits, and the effect on the patient's quality of life after discharge have not been established. In this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 164 healthy women undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopic procedures with a standardized anesthetic were randomized to receive placebo (Group A), ondansetron 2 mg at the start of and 2 mg after surgery (Group B), ondansetron 4 mg before induction (Group C), or ondansetron 4 mg after surgery (Group D). The effects of these regimens on the incidence, severity, and costs associated with PONV and discharge characteristics were determined, along with the patient's willingness to pay for antiemetics. Compared with ondansetron given before induction of anesthesia, the administration of ondansetron after surgery was associated with lower nausea scores, earlier intake of normal food, decreased incidence of frequent emesis (more than two episodes), and increased times until 25% of patients failed prophylactic antiemetic therapy (i.e., had an emetic episode or received rescue antiemetics for severe nausea) during the first 24 h postoperatively. This prophylactic regimen was also associated with the highest patient satisfaction and lowest cost-effectiveness ratios. Compared with the placebo group, ondansetron administered after surgery significantly reduced the incidence of PONV in the postanesthesia care unit and during the 24-h follow-up period and facilitated the recovery process by reducing the time to oral intake, ambulation, discharge readiness, resuming regular fluid intake and a normal diet. When ondansetron was given as a "split dose," its prophylactic antiemetic efficacy was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. In conclusion, the prophylactic administration of ondansetron after surgery, rather than before induction, may be associated with increased patient benefits. ⋯ Ondansetron 4 mg I.V. administered immediately before the end of surgery was the most efficacious in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting, facilitating both early and late recovery, and improving patient satisfaction after outpatient laparoscopy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of needle gauge and lidocaine pH on pain during intradermal injection.
Local anesthetics can produce pain during skin infiltration. We designed a randomized, prospective trial to determine whether needle gauge and/or solution pH affect pain during the intradermal infiltration of lidocaine. After approval by our institution's human studies review board, 40 healthy adult volunteers gave their consent to participate in this study. All of the volunteers randomly received four intradermal injections. Each volunteer was blinded as to the content of the intradermal injections and to which needle size was used for each injection. Each volunteer randomly received a 0.25-mL intradermal injection of the following four solutions: 1) lidocaine 2% administered through a 25-gauge needle (lido-25); 2) lidocaine 2% mixed with sodium bicarbonate (4 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 1 mL of sodium bicarbonate, pH 7.26) administered through a 25-gauge needle (lido-bicarb-25); 3) lidocaine 2% administered through a 30-gauge needle (lido-30); and 4) lidocaine 2% mixed with sodium bicarbonate (4 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 1 mL of sodium bicarbonate) administered through a 30-gauge needle (lido-bicarb-30). In each patient, the injection site was in the same region for each of the four injections. The skin wheal was tested for appropriate anesthesia using a 19-gauge needle on the skin wheal. A visual analog pain score was recorded after each intradermal injection. The pain scores were significantly higher in the lido-25 (3.2 +/- 0.2) group than in the lido-30 (2.5 +/- 0.3), lido-bicarb-25 (1.9 +/- 0.2), and lido-bicarb-30 (1.3 +/- 0.2) groups. The lido-bicarb-30 injection was also rated as less painful than the lido-30 injection. We found no differences between the lidobicarb-25 and the lido-bicarb-30 injections. Complete analgesia for the 19-gauge needle pain stimulus was achieved in all patients for each injection. We conclude that, overall, the pain intensity of an intradermal injection of 2% lidocaine is low. The addition of sodium bicarbonate to 2% lidocaine decreases the pain associated with an intradermal skin wheal, and although the use of a 30-gauge needle decreases the pain of injection, the addition of sodium bicarbonate seems to have a greater overall effect than needle size. ⋯ Forty volunteers randomly received four intradermal injections consisting of 2% lidocaine with or without sodium bicarbonate via a 25- or 30-gauge needle. The addition of bicarbonate had a greater overall effect than needle size in decreasing the pain associated with the intradermal injection of lidocaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Catecholamine activation in the vasomotor center on emergence from anesthesia: the effects of alpha2 agonists.
The rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) controls the vascular system and may contribute to postoperative hypertension. It comprises adrenergic cardiovascular neurons, a site for action of alpha2-adrenergic agonists. Because alpha2 agonists minimize perioperative circulatory activation, we asked the following question: do alpha2 agonists, such as clonidine and mivazerol, blunt the catecholamine activation observed in the RVLM on emergence from anesthesia? Halothane-anesthetized, paralyzed rats had their ventilatory, circulatory, and acid-base stability controlled. All pressure points and incisions were infiltrated with local anesthetics. With in vivo electrochemistry, a catechol signal was recorded in the RVLM during 150 min of stable halothane anesthesia (saline-halothane group); for 120 min after halothane discontinuation (saline-emergence group); after emergence and administration of the reference alpha2 agonist, clonidine 7 microg/kg or 21 microg/kg I.V. (50% or 90% effective dose [ED50 or ED90], respectively); and after emergence and administration of a new alpha2 agonist, mivazerol 20 microg/kg or 150 microg/kg I.V. (ED50 or ED90). Under halothane, dose-response curves for the RVLM catecholamine signal were constructed for mivazerol and an alpha2 antagonist, idazoxan (ED50 2.3 mg/kg I.V.). Stable halothane anesthesia (n = 5) led to no change in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), or catechol signal (CAOC). During emergence from anesthesia, the MAP, HR, and CAOC increased (n = 5). Clonidine led to a near total suppression of the RVLM catecholamine activation noticed on emergence from anesthesia (n = 5). Hypertension was partially blunted with clonidine 7 microg/kg (n = 5). Tachycardia was partially blunted with mivazerol 20 microg/kg (n = 5). Pretreatment with idazoxan suppressed all the effects of mivazerol (n = 5). ⋯ On emergence from anesthesia, alpha2 agonists modify the activity of adrenergic cardiovascular neurons located within the vasomotor center, as assessed by in vivo electrochemistry. We provide a rationale for the use of alpha2 agonists on emergence from anesthesia in coronary/hypertensive patients.