Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Tests to evaluate intravenous placement of epidural catheters in laboring women: a prospective clinical study.
We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an epinephrine-containing epidural test dose (EpiTD) as a marker of intravascular injection in 209 unmedicated laboring women. Maternal heart rate (MHR) was continuously monitored and recorded on a strip chart. A tocodynamometer monitored uterine activity. A lumbar epidural catheter was placed and aspirated. If aspiration was positive for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the catheter was replaced. In uterine diastole and with stable MHR, 198 patients received an EpiTD (epinephrine 15 microg plus lidocaine 45 mg) via the catheter. MHR and the generated HR strip were observed. A positive EpiTD was defined as a sudden increase in MHR of 10 bpm more than the resting MHR, within one minute after the injection, with a fast acceleratory phase of more than 1 bpm. Absence of a tachycardiac response suggested a negative EpiTD. If the tachycardiac response was deemed equivocal or a uterine contraction followed the EpiTD injection within 1 min, the EpiTD was invalidated and repeated. Catheter aspiration was repeated, and the catheter was removed if aspiration was positive. All patients with negative EpiTD and aspiration received 6-12 mL of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% with or without fentanyl 50 microg. Absence of analgesia without signs or symptoms of systemic toxicity after a maximum of bupivacaine 30 mg defined failed epidural analgesia. All patients with positive EpiTD and negative aspiration received 5 mL of lidocaine 2% epidurally as a second test dose (Lido100TD). The presence of tinnitus and/or metallic taste defined a positive Lido100TD. There were 176 true negatives, 0 false negatives, 14 true positives, and 8 false positives. The sensitivity of EpiTD was 100%, the specificity 96%, the negative predictive value 100%, and the positive predictive value 63%. The prevalence of negative tests was 88%, and the prevalence of positive tests was 12%. The overall accuracy of an EpiTD was 95.5%. We conclude that EpiTD is a reliable test to identify i.v. catheters during the performance of lumbar epidural analgesia in laboring patients. ⋯ Catheters inserted for epidural analgesia in laboring patients may accidentally enter a blood vessel. Local anesthetics injected through these catheters may cause seizures and cardiac arrest. In this study, we concluded that injecting a small amount of epinephrine before injecting a local anesthetic frequently helps to identify these misplaced catheters. Few catheters may actually be in the correct place even after responses to epinephrine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of varied doses of epinephrine on duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia in the thoracic and lumbosacral dermatomes.
The efficacy of epinephrine in prolonging spinal analgesia has recently been confirmed in the lumbosacral but not in the thoracic, segments. Most previous studies used doses of epinephrine smaller than 0.3 mg. We studied the effects of 0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg of epinephrine added to hyperbaric lidocaine 60 mg in 7.5% dextrose solution for spinal anesthesia. Eighty patients were randomly divided into four groups: Group A received lidocaine without epinephrine, Group B received lidocaine plus 0.2 mL (0.2 mg) of epinephrine 1:1000 solution, Group C received lidocaine plus 0.4 mL (0.4 mg) of epinephrine, and Group D received lidocaine plus 0.6 mL (0.6 mg) of epinephrine. The maximal cephalad sensory level was between T2 and T3 for all groups. The median times for analgesia to regress two and four segments were significantly prolonged in Group D, but not in either Group B or C, compared with those in Group A. Times for regression to T12 and L3 were significantly prolonged in Groups B, C, and D compared with Group A. We conclude that the dose-dependent relationship of spinal analgesia can be applied to epinephrine, and that larger doses prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia in the thoracic as well as the lumbosacral dermatomes. ⋯ Prolongation of lidocaine spinal analgesia by intrathecal epinephrine is established in the lumbosacral, but not in the thoracic, dermatomes. Three doses of epinephrine--0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg--were compared. A dose-dependent response and significant prolongation with the 0.6-mg dose in the thoracic dermatomes were confirmed.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
The effects of age and gender on the optimal premedication dose of intramuscular midazolam.
We conducted a double-blind study on the effects of age and gender on the optimal premedication dose of i.m. midazolam. We randomly divided 100 male and 100 female patients in each of three age groups: A = 20-39 yr, B = 40-59 yr, and C = 60-79 yr (total 600 patients) into five groups according to midazolam dosage: 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 mg/kg. Midazolam was injected i.m. with atropine 0.01 mg/kg 15 min before the induction of anesthesia. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), sedation level, tongue root depression, eyelash reflex, and anterograde amnesia were monitored. There were no significant differences between male and female patients in any variables in any age. Decrease of SpO2 and loss of eyelash reflex were seen with midazolam 0.10 mg/kg in Group A, and with 0.08 mg/kg in Group B. In Group C, decreases in BP and SpO2, loss of eyelash reflex, and depression of the tongue root were observed with midazolam 0.06 mg/kg. In conclusion, the optimal doses of i.m. midazolam administered 15 min before the induction of anesthesia in male or female patients were 0.08, 0.06, and 0.04 mg/kg for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. ⋯ Midazolam is the most widely used preoperative anxiolytic drug. Our purpose was to evaluate the optimal dose of i.m. midazolam that would maximize the desired effects and minimize the side effects in a common clinical setting. Results indicate that age, but not gender, should affect the i.m. midazolam dose selected for premedication.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPremedication with fentanyl and midazolam decreases the reliability of intravenous lidocaine test dose.
This study was performed to determine whether premedication with midazolam and fentanyl prevents reliable detection of an i.v. lidocaine test dose. Thirty ASA physical status I or II patients received either 3 mL of saline or 1.5 mg of midazolam (1.5 mL) plus 75 microg of fentanyl (1.5 mL) i.v. in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Five minutes later, lidocaine 1 mg/kg was injected i.v. At 1.5 min before and every minute after lidocaine administration, each subject was questioned regarding the presence of four symptoms of systemic lidocaine toxicity. Any new tinnitus, perioral numbness, metallic taste, or light-headedness within 5 min after lidocaine administration was considered a positive response. All 15 patients in the saline group (100% sensitivity) had a positive response to i.v. lidocaine, but only 9 of 15 patients in the sedation group had a positive response (60% sensitivity; P = 0.017). We conclude that midazolam and fentanyl premedication decreases the reliability of subjective detection of i.v. lidocaine. ⋯ Anesthesiologists often rely on subjective symptoms to prevent local anesthetic toxicity while performing regional anesthesia. Sedatives are often administered during the administration of regional anesthesia. This study demonstrates that typical sedation decreases the reliability of detection of local anesthetic toxicity by subjective symptoms.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of epinephrine on small-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: clinical implications for ambulatory surgery.
The effect of adding epinephrine to small doses of spinal bupivacaine on the duration of sensory motor block has not been carefully investigated. Twelve volunteers underwent hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (7.5 mg) with and without epinephrine (0.2 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation (at umbilicus, pubis, knee, and ankle), and tolerance of a pneumatic thigh tourniquet. Motor block was assessed with isometric force dynamometry. Discharge criteria were defined as return of pinprick sensation to dermatome S2, ability to ambulate, and ability to urinate. Extent of sensory block to pinprick over time was unaffected by the addition of epinephrine. However, epinephrine prolonged tolerance of TES at the pubis, knee, and ankle (33-48 min, P < 0.05) and of thigh tourniquet (30 min, P < 0.01). Motor block was prolonged by epinephrine at the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles (by 23 and 51 min, respectively, P < 0.002). Achievement of discharge criteria was prolonged by 48 min by the addition of epinephrine (P < 0.01). Thus, epinephrine may prolong surgical anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery and delay time until patients achieve discharge criteria. ⋯ Using a cross-over study design, 12 volunteers underwent bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with and without epinephrine. This study suggests that adding epinephrine to bupivacaine may prolong surgical anesthesia and also delay patients' discharge.