Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
Comparative StudyTesting internal consistency and construct validity during evaluation of performance in a patient simulator.
The primary goal of this study was to test the items in a rating system developed to evaluate anesthesiologists' performance in a simulated patient environment. A secondary goal was to determine whether the test scores could discriminate between resident and staff anesthesiologists. Two 5-item clinical scenarios included patient evaluation and induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Rating scales were no response to the problem (score = 0), compensating intervention (score = 1), and corrective treatment (score = 2). Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Scores between groups were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Subjects consisted of 8 anesthesiology residents and 17 university clinical faculty. The Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.27 for Scenario A and 0.28 for Scenario B. Two items in each scenario markedly decreased internal consistency. When these four items were eliminated, Cronbach's coefficient alpha for the remaining six items was 0.66. Faculty anesthesiologists scored higher than residents on all six items (P < 0.001). A patient simulator-based evaluation process with acceptable reliability was developed. ⋯ The reliability of anesthesia clinical performance in a patient simulation environment was assessed in this study. Of 10 items, 4 were poor in the evaluation process. When these items were removed, the reliability of the instrument improved to a level consistent with other studies. Because faculty scored higher than resident anesthesiologists, the instrument also showed discriminant validity.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
Quantitative analysis of respiratory, motor, and sensory function after supraclavicular block.
The incidence and clinical significance of hemidiaphragmatic paresis after supraclavicular block of the brachial plexus is unknown. Eight healthy volunteers received a supraclavicular block with a standard technique using 30 mL of 1.5% lidocaine. Respiratory function was assessed with ultrasound of the diaphragm, respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), and pulmonary function tests (PFT) every 20 min. Sensory block was assessed with pinprick and motor block with isometric force dynamometry every 20 min. Four of eight subjects demonstrated hemidiaphragmatic paresis on both ultrasound and RIP. No subject experienced changes in PFT values or subjective symptoms of respiratory difficulty. Motor and sensory blockade outlasted hemidiaphragmatic paresis. These results are contrasted to the often symptomatic, 100% incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis seen after interscalene block. In this study of healthy volunteers, supraclavicular block was associated with a 50% incidence (95% confidence interval 14-86) of hemidiaphragmatic paresis that was not accompanied by clinical evidence of respiratory compromise. ⋯ Interscalene block is always associated with diaphragmatic paralysis and respiratory compromise. The significance of these side effects after supraclavicular block is unknown. Using sensitive measures of respiratory function, we determined that diaphragmatic paralysis occurs less often with the supraclavicular approach and is not associated with respiratory difficulties in healthy subjects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
0.45% saline and 5% dextrose in water, but not 0.9% saline or 5% dextrose in 0.9% saline, worsen brain edema two hours after closed head trauma in rats.
In this study, we examined the effect of four i.v. fluids (250 mL/kg) on blood glucose and osmolality and brain tissue specific gravity after closed head trauma (CHT) in rats. CHT was delivered at Time 0; blood was sampled at 60 min; fluid infusion began at 75 min and ended at 105 min. Blood was again sampled at 105 and 120 min, and brain tissue specific gravity was determined at 120 min. Five groups (one control and four fluid-treated groups) received CHT, and five other groups (one control and four fluid-treated) did not (n = 9 in each group). 0.45% saline (1/2 NS) and 5% dextrose in water (D5W) accentuated the decrease of brain tissue specific gravity (1.0366 +/- 0.0025 and 1.0368 +/- 0.0028, respectively; mean +/- SD) caused by CHT (1.0395 +/- 0.0036), but 5% dextrose in 0.9% saline (D5NS) and 0.9% saline (NS) did not (1.0431 +/- 0.0042 and 1.0389 +/- 0.0049, respectively). In addition, 1/2 NS decreased blood osmolality (248 +/- 6 mOsm/L), D5W increased blood glucose (1095 +/- 173 mg/dL), D5NS increased blood osmolality (350 +/- 5 mOsm/L) and glucose (1695 +/- 76 mg/dL), and NS caused no significant change. We conclude that administering hypoosmolar i.v. fluids after CHT causes a significant worsening of cerebral edema 2 h after CHT. ⋯ We previously reported worse neurological outcome and/or mortality after closed head trauma in rats when 5% dextrose in water or 0.45% saline was given i.v. compared with 0.9% saline or 5% dextrose in 0.9% saline. The present results and our previous findings indicate that worsening of outcome after closed head trauma in rats may be caused more by edema formation than by hyperglycemia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
The effect of rate of administration on brain concentrations of propofol in sheep.
A marked reduction in the dose of propofol required to achieve the onset of anesthesia with slower administration rates has previously been reported, but the mechanism of this phenomenon is unclear. We used a chronically instrumented sheep preparation to examine the effects of different administration rates of propofol on its distribution in the brain using mass balance principles to calculate brain concentrations. The administration of 100 mg of propofol i.v. at rates of 200, 50, and 20 mg/min had minimal effect on both the peak brain concentrations of propofol and the total amount of drug entering the brain. The more rapid administration rates increased the rate of uptake into the brain but resulted in large increases in peak arterial blood propofol concentrations. These faster administration rates have previously been associated with high arterial propofol concentrations and an increased risk of hypotension. Simulation of titration to an end point revealed that the dose sparing previously reported at induction with slow administration rates relates only to improved titration to effect, and does not result in more anesthesia for a given dose. Therefore, we conclude that the administration of propofol over 2 min provides a reasonable rate of induction and improved titration to effect, yet avoids excessively high arterial concentrations. ⋯ Alterations in the rate of administration of propofol in sheep have been shown to have little effect on the quantity of propofol delivered to the brain. At induction of anesthesia, administration rates of approximately 50 mg/min seem likely to provide improved titration to effect without excessively prolonging induction.