Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe failure of negative pressure rewarming (Thermostat) to accelerate recovery from mild hypothermia in postoperative surgical patients.
The Thermostat device (Aquarius Medical Corp., Phoenix, AZ) is used in a new technique to accelerate recovery from hypothermia by mechanically distending blood vessels in the hand, thereby increasing transfer of exogenous heat to the body core. We evaluated the use of the Thermostat device in patients with mild postoperative hypothermia (< 36 degrees C). We studied adult patients undergoing elective surgery, general anesthesia, and neuromuscular blockade. Patients with an initial postoperative tympanic membrane temperature < 36 degrees C were randomized into two groups: 1) Thermostat, which consisted of a hypothermia warming mitt/seal and thermal exchange chamber for 60 min, and 2) conventional treatment, which consisted of warm blankets and/or radiant heat. Of the 191 patients enrolled, 60 (31%) developed hypothermia and were randomized to receive the Thermostat (n = 30) or conventional methods (n = 30). Fourteen patients in the Thermostat group and 17 patients in the conventional group rewarmed to 36 degrees C before discharge from the recovery room (P is not significant). There were no differences in vital signs, rewarming time, time to discharge from the recovery room, or postoperative temperature between groups. We conclude that patients with mild postoperative hypothermia rewarmed in a similar fashion, regardless of whether the Thermostat or conventional methods were used. ⋯ We found that a commercially available negative pressure rewarming device (Thermostat; Aquarius Medical Corp., Phoenix, AZ) was not effective in accelerating rewarming in postoperative hypothermic surgical patients after general anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effect of nitric oxide on platelets when delivered to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Nitric oxide (NO) decreases platelet adhesion to foreign surfaces in the in vitro models of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We hypothesized that NO, delivered into the membrane oxygenator (MO), would exert a platelet-sparing effect after CPB. Forty-seven patients scheduled for coronary artery surgery were randomized to either a NO group, in which NO (100 ppm) was delivered into the MO, or a control group, in which CPB was conducted without NO. Platelet numbers, platelet aggregation response to 2.5-20 microM adenosine diphosphate, and beta-thromboglobulin levels were measured after induction of anesthesia, after 1 h on CPB and 2 h after the end of CPB. Met-hemoglobin levels were measured during CPB. The amount of blood products administered and chest tube drainage were measured in the first postoperative 18 h. NO delivered into the MO for up to 180 min did not increase met-hemoglobin levels above 4%. NO inhibited the platelet aggregation response to 2.5 microM ADP during CPB, otherwise NO had no other detectable effect on the aggregation responses or the levels of beta-thromboglobulin. Platelet numbers were not significantly altered by NO. NO did not alter the use of blood products or chest tube drainage. In conclusion, this study suggests that NO delivered into the MO of the CPB circuit does not significantly alter platelet aggregation and numbers, and does not affect bleeding. ⋯ Nitric oxide affects platelet function. We demonstrated that nitric oxide delivered into the gas inflow of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit membrane oxygenator does not significantly alter platelet numbers or function.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialQuantitative comparison of leakage under the tourniquet in forearm versus conventional intravenous regional anesthesia.
We compared the quantitative leakage between forearm and conventional IV regional anesthesia (IVRA). Forearm IVRA remains unpopular because of the theoretical risk of local anesthetic leakage through the interosseous vessels. IVRA was simulated on the forearm or arm during two separate, randomized sessions using a double tourniquet in 14 volunteers. A radiolabeled substance, DISIDA (99m Tc-disofenin) with a structure similar to lidocaine, was injected instead of local anesthetic. Volumes of 0.4 mL/kg (maximum 25 mL), were used for forearm IVRA and 0.6 mL/kg (maximum 45 mL) for conventional IVRA. A gamma camera recorded radioactivity levels in the limb distal to the tourniquet every 30 s while the tourniquet was inflated (25 min) and for 20 min postdeflation. The leakage of radiolabeled substance during inflation was similar in both groups, 6%+/-12% (mean +/- SD) from the forearm and 10%+/-20% from the upper arm. After deflation, mean loss of radioactivity was higher in conventional IVRA, 70%+/-7% vs 57%+/-11% and 82%+/-5% vs 69%+/-11% at 3 and 20 min, respectively (P < 0.001). We conclude that forearm IVRA results in tourniquet leakage comparable to conventional IVRA and is potentially safer because the required dose of local anesthetic is smaller. ⋯ Using a tourniquet on the forearm for IV regional anesthesia does not increase the risk of drug leakage. This is potentially a safer technique compared with conventional IV regional anesthesia because a much smaller dose of local anesthetic is required.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear?
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain, yet controversy surrounds whether the VAS score is ratio or ordinal data. We studied 52 postoperative patients and measured their pain intensity using the VAS. We then asked them to consider different amounts of pain (conceptually twice as much and then half as much) and asked them to repeat their VAS rating after each consideration (VAS2 and VAS3, respectively). Patients with unrelieved pain had their pain treated with IV fentanyl and were then asked to rate their pain intensity when they considered they had half as much pain. We compared the baseline VAS (VAS1) with VAS2 and VAS3. The mean (95% confidence interval) for VAS2:1 was 2.12 (1.81-2.43) and VAS3:1 was 0.45 (0.38-0.52). We conclude that the VAS is linear for mild-to-moderate pain, and the VAS score can be treated as ratio data. ⋯ A change in the visual analog scale score represents a relative change in the magnitude of pain sensation. Use of the VAS in comparative analgesic trials can now meaningfully quantify differences in potency and efficacy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether larger doses of anesthetics are required in the anxious patient to establish and maintain a clinically sufficient hypnotic component of the anesthetic state. Fifty-seven women undergoing bilateral laparoscopic tubal ligation with a propofol-based anesthetic regimen were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Trait (baseline) and state (situational) anxiety were assessed in all patients immediately before surgery, and the propofol doses required for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia were recorded. A bispectral index monitor was used to assure that the hypnotic component of the anesthetic state was the same in all patients. We found that patients with high trait anxiety required more propofol for both the induction (2.1+/-0.4 vs 1.8+/-0.3 mg/kg; P = 0.01) and maintenance of anesthesia (170+/-70 vs 110+/-20 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.02), compared with patients with low trait anxiety. State anxiety, however, was not found to affect the propofol doses required for the induction or maintenance of anesthesia. Multiple regression models confirmed that Trait anxiety is an independent predictor for intraoperative propofol requirements (P = 0.02). We conclude that increased baseline (i.e., trait) anxiety is associated with increased intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Thus, we suggest that the initial dose of anesthetic administered by an anesthesiologist should be modified based on the anxiety level exhibited by the patient. ⋯ The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. We found that high baseline anxiety predicts increased intraoperative anesthetic requirements. We suggest that anesthesiologists should modify the initial induction dose based on the anxiety level exhibited by the patient.