Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery.
Transfusion therapy after cardiac surgery is empirically guided, partly due to a lack of specific point-of-care hemostasis monitors. In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial, we studied cardiac surgical patients at moderate to high risk of transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided transfusion algorithm (n = 53) or routine transfusion therapy (n = 52) for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass. Coagulation tests, TEG variables, mediastinal tube drainage, and transfusions were compared at multiple time points. There were no demographic or hemostatic test result differences between groups, and all patients were given prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Intraoperative transfusion rates did not differ, but there were significantly fewer postoperative and total transfusions in the TEG group. The proportion of patients receiving fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was 4 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 16 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.002). Patients receiving platelets were 7 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 15 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the TEG group also received less volume of FFP (36 +/- 142 vs 217 +/- 463 mL; P < 0.04). Mediastinal tube drainage was not statistically different 6, 12, or 24 h postoperatively. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring using TEG resulted in fewer transfusions in the postoperative period. We conclude that the reduction in transfusions may have been due to improved hemostasis in these patients who had earlier and specific identification of the hemostasis abnormality and thus received more appropriate intraoperative transfusion therapy. These data support the use of TEG in an algorithm to guide transfusion therapy in complex cardiac surgery. ⋯ Transfusion of allogeneic blood products is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared a transfusion algorithm using point-of-care coagulation testing with routine laboratory testing, and found the algorithm to be effective in reducing transfusion requirements.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of needle bevel orientation during epidural catheter insertion in laboring parturients.
Lateral needle bevel orientation during identification of the epidural space has been recommended to reduce the risk of postdural puncture headache (PDPH). Rotation to cephalad or caudad orientation before catheter insertion is assumed necessary for analgesic success. We prospectively compared the effects of catheter insertion through lateral- and cephalad-oriented Tuohy needle bevels in laboring parturients. Anesthesiology residents were randomized to identify the epidural space with bevels oriented cephalad or lateral. Catheters were inserted without needle rotation. Outcomes compared included ease of insertion, analgesic effectiveness, and complications. We evaluated 534 catheter insertions in 500 parturients. Initial catheter insertion produced satisfactory analgesia in 80.2% of the lateral group versus 91.1% of the cephalad group (P < 0.001). Resistance preventing catheter insertion accounted for the difference. There were no differences in i.v. cannulation (5.8% vs 5.1%), dural puncture (3.8% vs 2.0%), PDPH (0.4% vs 0.7%), or asymmetric block (31% vs 27%). There was a slightly higher rate of paresthesias in the lateral group (31% vs 23%; P = 0.048). In 78% of parturients experiencing both paresthesias and asymmetric block, the side of the paresthesia and greater extent of block were the same. Analgesic effectiveness, as measured by using a visual analog scale, was not different between the groups. ⋯ Two methods of epidural catheter insertion were compared in laboring parturients. Catheter insertion with the needle orifice oriented cephalad was associated with the greatest initial success and the fewest complications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1999
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialEpidural steroids for treating "failed back surgery syndrome": is fluoroscopy really necessary?
Epidural steroids are commonly administered in the treatment of "failed back surgery syndrome." Because patient response is dependent on accurate steroid placement, fluoroscopic guidance has been advocated. However, because of ever-increasing medical expenditures, the cost-benefit of routine fluoroscopy should be critically evaluated. Therefore, 50 patients were enrolled into this institutional review board-approved, prospective, controlled, single-blinded study. At a predetermined intervertebral level, the epidural space was identified using an air loss of resistance technique. Thereafter, an epidural catheter was inserted 2 cm through the epidural needle. To determine the accuracy of the clinical placement, contrast medium was administered through the epidural catheter; antero-posterior and lateral lumbar spine radiographs were then obtained. The number of attempts required to successfully locate the epidural space, the reliability of the air loss of resistance technique in indicating successful epidural penetration in failed back surgery syndrome, the ability of the clinician to accurately predict the intervertebral space at which the epidural injection was performed, and the spread of contrast medium within the epidural space were recorded. A total of 48 epidurograms were performed. The number of attempts to successfully enter the epidural space was 2 +/- 1. In 44 cases, the radiological studies confirmed the clinical impression that the epidural space had been successfully identified. In three patients, the epidural catheter was in the paravertebral tissue. One myelogram was recorded. In 25 patients, the epidural catheter did not pass through the predetermined intervertebral space. In 35 cases, the contrast medium did not reach the level of pathology. ⋯ The clinical sign of loss of resistance is a reliable indicator of epidural space penetration in most cases of "failed back surgery syndrome." However, surface anatomy is unreliable and may result in inaccurate steroid placement. Finally, despite accurate placement, the depot-steroid solution will spread to reach the level of pathology in only 26% of cases.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1999
Comparative StudyThe effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on human neutrophil functions.
Neutrophil functions are inhibited by various anesthetics. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine, alpha2-agonists, are often used as adjuncts to anesthesia. Thus, we conducted the current study to determine the effect of clonidine, dexmedetomidine, and xylazine at clinically (or veterinary anesthetically) relevant concentrations (and 10 and 100 times these concentrations) on several aspects of human neutrophil functions using an in vitro system. The three alpha2-agonists had no effects on chemotaxis, phagocytosis, or superoxide anion (O2-) production of neutrophils, except that the highest concentration of clonidine inhibited chemotaxis. Increases in intracellular calcium concentrations in neutrophils stimulated by chemotaxin were not influenced by clonidine, dexmedetomidine, or xylazine. Unchanged calcium concentrations may contribute to failure to modulate the neutrophil functions. In addition, these drugs did not scavenge O2- generated by the cell-free (xanthine-xanthine oxidase) system. This is the first report concerning the effect of clonidine or dexmedetomidine on human neutrophil functions. Our findings suggest that we may not have to take extra precautions in using the alpha2-agonists in patients with infection, but that we cannot expect these drugs to be prophylaxis against autotissue injuries whose pathogenesis includes activation of neutrophils. ⋯ Neutrophils are involved in the antibacterial host defense system and autotissue injury. We found that clinically relevant concentrations of clonidine and dexmedetomidine do not affect chemotaxis, phagocytosis, or superoxide production by human neutrophils. These findings indicate that it may not be necessary to take special care in using alpha2-agonists in patients with infection, sepsis, or systemic inflammation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1999
Comparative StudyBeta-adrenergic blockers and vasovagal episodes during shoulder surgery in the sitting position under interscalene block.
Shoulder surgery is often performed with patients in the sitting position under interscalene block anesthesia. Vasovagal episodes, characterized by a sudden decrease in heart rate and/or blood pressure, have a reported incidence of 17%-24% in this setting. We performed a retrospective study to determine whether there was an association between the use of beta-adrenergic blockers and the incidence of these episodes. Of the 150 patients identified, 20 (13.3%) had a vasovagal event. Similar proportions of patients had received a beta-adrenergic blocker in the group who had a vasovagal event compared with those who did not (20% vs 18%; P = 0.95). No other differences could be identified. We conclude that vasovagal episodes occur frequently in this setting with no identifiable risk factors. Beta-adrenergic blockers were not associated retrospectively with either an increased or decreased incidence of these episodes. The most likely mechanism involves the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. ⋯ In this retrospective study of 150 patients who underwent shoulder surgery in the sitting position under interscalene block, we found a 13% incidence of vasovagal episodes. Unlike a previous study, this was not affected by the use of beta-blockers. A randomized, prospective study is necessary to clarify this issue.