Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of intravenous atropine after a saline infusion in the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients.
We investigated the efficacy of IV atropine for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients. Seventy-five patients undergoing transurethral prostate or bladder surgery were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 25), atropine 5 microg/kg (small-dose atropine, n = 25) or atropine 10 microg/kg (large-dose atropine, n = 25) after the induction of spinal anesthesia. All the patients received an IV infusion of 10 mL/kg 0.9% normal saline over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia. The systolic blood pressure decreased in all three groups after spinal anesthesia. There was a significant increase in the mean heart rate in both atropine groups as compared to the placebo group (placebo group: 78 bpm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.6-78.5; small-dose atropine group: 86 bpm, 95% CI 83.9-88.8; large-dose atropine group: 97 bpm, 95% CI 94.5-100.3; P: = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the incidence of hypotension in patients who received atropine (placebo group: 76%, small-dose atropine group: 52%, large-dose atropine group: 40%, P: = 0.03). The mean dose of ephedrine required was significantly decreased in the atropine groups (placebo group: 12.2 mg [SD= 10.5], small-dose atropine group: 7.4 mg [SD= 10.0], large-dose atropine group: 5.4 mg [SD= 8.7 mg], P: = 0.048). The total amount of IV fluid and number of patients requiring metaraminol in addition to 30 mg of ephedrine were not significantly different among the three groups. Significant side effects, such as confusion, ST segment changes or angina were not detected in any of the patients. We conclude that IV atropine may be a useful supplement to the existing methods in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia. ⋯ IV atropine increases heart rate in a dose-dependent manner in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. It reduces the incidence of hypotension and the dose of ephedrine required. Small-dose atropine may be a useful supplement in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of prolonged low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal and hepatic function.
We assessed the effects of prolonged low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal and hepatic functions by comparing high-flow sevoflurane with low-flow isoflurane anesthesia. Thirty patients scheduled for surgery of > or =10 h in duration randomly received either low-flow (1 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 10), high-flow (6-10 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 10), or low-flow (1 L/min) isoflurane anesthesia (n = 10). We measured the circuit concentrations of Compound A and serum fluoride. Renal function was assessed by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and urinary excretion of glucose, albumin, protein, and N:-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase. The hepatic function was assessed by serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Compound A exposure was 277 +/- 120 (135-478) ppm-h (mean +/- SD [range]) in the low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia. The maximum concentration of serum fluoride was 53.6 +/- 5.3 (43.4-59.3) micromol/L for the low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, 47.1 +/- 21.2 (21.4-82.3) micromol/L for the high-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, and 7.4 +/- 3.2 (3.2-14.0) micromol/L for the low-flow isoflurane anesthesia. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were within the normal range, and creatinine clearance did not decrease throughout the study period in any group. Urinary excretion of glucose, albumin, protein, and N:-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase increased after anesthesia in all groups, but no significant differences were seen among the three groups at any time point after anesthesia. Lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase on postanesthesia Day 1 were higher in the high-flow sevoflurane group than in the low-flow sevoflurane group. However, there were no significant differences in any other hepatic function tests among the groups. We conclude that prolonged low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia has the same effect on renal and hepatic functions as high-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ During low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, intake of Compound A reached 277 +/- 120 ppm-h, but the effect on the kidney and the liver was the same in high-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2000
Case ReportsThe successful use of regional anesthesia to prevent involuntary movements in a patient undergoing awake craniotomy.
The authors demonstrate that the combination of single and continuous peripheral nerve blocks allows the control of involuntary movements in patients undergoing awake craniotomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2000
Case ReportsSevere hypotension in a patient receiving pemoline during general anesthesia.
This case reports hypotension under general anesthesia in a patient taking pemoline. Vigilance for unexpected hypotension is important in patients who are treated with psychostimulants. If hypotension occurs, vasopressors that act directly on adrenergic receptors should be used.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2000
Isoflurane depresses electroencephalographic and medial thalamic responses to noxious stimulation via an indirect spinal action.
Anesthetics such as isoflurane act in the spinal cord to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation. Spinal anesthesia decreases hypnotic/sedative requirements, possibly by decreasing afferent transmission of stimuli. We hypothesized that isoflurane action in the spinal cord would similarly depress the ascending transmission of noxious input to the thalamus and cerebral cortex. In six isoflurane-anesthetized goats, we measured electroencephalographic (EEG) and thalamic single-unit responses to a clamp applied to the forelimb. Cranial bypass permitted differential isoflurane delivery to the torso and cranial circulations. When the cranial-torso isoflurane combination was 1.3% +/- 0.2%-1.0% +/- 0.4% the noxious stimulus did not evoke significant changes in the EEG or thalamic activity: 389 (153-544) to 581 (172-726) impulses/min, (median, 25th-75th percentile range, P: > 0.05). When the cranial-torso isoflurane combination was 1.3% +/- 0.2%-0.3% +/- 0.2%, noxious stimulation increased thalamic activity: 804 (366-1162) to 1124 (766-1865) impulses/min (P: < 0.05), and the EEG "desynchronized": total EEG power decreased from 25 +/- 20 microV(2) to 12 +/- 8 microV(2) (P: < 0.05). When the cranial-torso isoflurane was 1.7% +/- 0.1%-0.3% +/- 0.2%, the noxious stimulus did not significantly affect thalamic: 576 (187-738) to 1031 (340-1442) impulses/min (P: > 0.05), or EEG activity. The indirect torso effect of isoflurane on evoked EEG total power (12.6 +/- 2.7 microV(2)/vol%, mean +/- SE) was quantitatively similar to the direct cranial effect (17.7 +/- 3.0 microV(2)/vol%; P: > 0.05). These data suggest that isoflurane acts in the spinal cord to blunt the transmission of noxious inputs to the thalamus and cerebral cortex, and thus might indirectly contribute to anesthetic endpoints such as amnesia and unconsciousness. ⋯ Isoflurane action in the spinal cord diminished the transmission of noxious input to the brain. Because memory and consciousness are likely dependent on the "arousal" state of the brain, this indirect action of isoflurane could contribute to anesthetic-induced amnesia and unconsciousness.