Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialFast-track office-based anesthesia: a comparison of propofol versus desflurane with antiemetic prophylaxis in spontaneously breathing patients.
Compared to propofol, maintenance of anesthesia with desflurane provided significantly better intraoperative conditions during office-based surgery. In addition, desflurane with routine antiemetic prophylaxis was associated with a faster early recovery and similar incidence of postoperative side effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe dose-range effects of sufentanil added to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.
To determine the minimal sufentanil concentration required to improve the quality of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor, we compared the efficacy of a combination of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1:800,000 epinephrine and different concentrations of sufentanil in a double-blinded randomized study. Concentrations were no sufentanil (n = 66), 0.078 microg/mL sufentanil (n = 65), 0.156 microg/mL sufentanil (n = 65), 0.312 microg/mL sufentanil (n = 65), and 0.468 microg/mL sufentanil (n = 67). The patient-controlled epidural analgesia setting was a 12-mL bolus dose and a 25-min lockout interval. Pain was scored at 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and full cervical dilation by using a 10-cm visual analog scale. At full cervical dilation, the pain scores were lower in the groups receiving a solution of at least 0.156 microg/mL sufentanil. Few differences were observed when using the larger concentrations, except for increased pruritus intensity. The duration of labor and the mode of delivery were similar in each group. Rescue analgesia, which consisted of 6 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, was infrequent and comparable between groups. The use of the pump did not differ between groups. Adding a small concentration of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor improved the quality of analgesia but did not modify the bupivacaine requirement. Reducing the sufentanil concentrations to 0.156 microg/mL decreased the pruritus intensity without reducing analgesia. ⋯ Adding a small concentration of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor improved the quality of analgesia but did not modify the bupivacaine requirement. Reducing the sufentanil concentrations to 0.156 microg/mL decreased the pruritus intensity without reducing analgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Comparative Study Clinical TrialA videographic analysis of laryngeal exposure comparing the articulating laryngoscope and external laryngeal manipulation.
Activation of the articulating laryngoscope and external laryngeal manipulation (ELM) improve laryngeal exposure during direct laryngoscopy. We used a head-mounted direct laryngoscopy imaging system and a previously validated scoring system for assessing laryngeal view (the percentage of glottic opening or POGO score) on 33 adult patients undergoing laryngoscopy. On each patient, we videotaped the initial laryngeal exposure (blade not activated), the view with activation of the blade, and the view with operator-directed external laryngeal manipulation. ⋯ We conclude that ELM is superior to articulating laryngoscope blade activation in improving POGO scores during laryngoscopy on adult patients in standard sniffing position. Using recordings from a direct laryngoscopy video system, we compared laryngeal views in 33 patients with a special articulating laryngoscope blade to views achieved by external laryngeal manipulation (pressing on the patient's neck). Laryngeal exposure, which is important for placement of tracheal tubes, was better with external laryngeal manipulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Comparative StudyIntraoperative monitoring in neuroanesthesia: a national comparison between two surveys in Germany in 1991 and 1997. Scientific Neuroanesthesia Research Group of the German Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine.
Two surveys initiated by the Neuroanesthesia Research Group of the German Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine examined the practice of intraoperative monitoring during intracranial procedures in Germany in 1991 and 1997. Questionnaires were mailed to departments that were registered members of the German Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and that provided neuroanesthesia service on a routine basis in 1991. In 1997, the survey was repeated in the 1991 respondents. In 1991, 68 departments and in 1997, 44 departments returned completed questionnaires, indicating a response rate of 87% for 1991 and of 65% for 1997. Compared with 1991, the standards for monitoring, such as surveillance of oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and body temperature, were universally applied in adult and pediatric patients in 1997. Overall, there was a 20% increase in neuromuscular blockade monitoring and in the use of electroencephalography and evoked potentials in 1997 compared with 1991. Further brain-specific monitoring was rarely provided in 1997. Overall, jugular venous oximetry was used in 20% and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in 15% of responding hospitals. To detect venous air embolism in sitting patients, 75% of all responding hospitals used precordial Doppler ultrasonography in both years, whereas transesophageal echocardiography was more often used in 1997 (38%) as compared with 1991 (17%). ⋯ Standards of anesthetic monitoring were surveyed in neuroanesthesia in Germany in 1991 and 1997. Central nervous system monitoring was not the standard of practice.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Neither GABA(A) nor strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors are the sole mediators of MAC for isoflurane.
Inhaled anesthetics produce immobility (a cardinal aspect of general anesthesia) by an action on the spinal cord, possibly by potentiating the responses of gamma-amino-n-butyric acid (GABA(A)) and glycine receptors to GABA and glycine. In this study, we antagonized GABA(A) and glycine responses by intrathecal administration of picrotoxin (a noncompetitive GABA(A) antagonist), strychnine (a competitive glycine antagonist), or combinations of these drugs. We measured the capacity of antagonist infusion to increase isoflurane MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic that prevents movement in response to noxious stimuli in 50% of subjects). We found that these potent GABA(A) and glycine receptor antagonists had a ceiling effect, either alone or in combination increasing the MAC of isoflurane by at most 47%. ⋯ gamma-amino-n-butyric acid and glycine receptors may in part be responsible for the immobilizing action of isoflurane. They are not, however, the only receptors that contribute to isoflurane-induced immobility (i.e., that determine the MAC of isoflurane).