Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2001
Learning endotracheal intubation in a clinical skills learning center: a quantitative study.
This study aimed to develop statistical models describing the learning of endotracheal intubation (ETI). We collected data from 100 subjects undergoing ETI training with intubatable medical models and manikins (airway trainers). Trainees initially viewed a video about ETI and an instructor demonstrated the technique. ⋯ Trainees became familiar with an airway trainer after multiple trials, as demonstrated by a 50% decrease in the odds of successful ETI when starting on a new trainer. The learning model indicated that a trainee learns about as much from 1 successful ETI as from 12 (95% confidence interval, 2-23) failed trials. The results demonstrate the feasibility of statistical modeling of the learning of ETI and provide insight into the learning process.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEMLA versus nitrous oxide for venous cannulation in children.
We compared EMLA cream with nitrous oxide (N(2)O) for providing pain relief during venous cannulation in children. In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 40 children, 6-11 yr, ASA status I or II, undergoing scheduled surgery received either EMLA cream and inhaled air and oxygen (Group EMLA) or a placebo cream and inhaled 70% N(2)O in oxygen (Group N(2)O) before venous cannulation. Pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale and the Objective Pain Scale. ⋯ There was no statistical difference between the groups for the physiologic variables. Minor side effects were significantly more common in the N(2)O group (11 of 20) than in the EMLA group (7 of 20) (P = 0.0248). We conclude that both techniques provided adequate pain relief during venous cannulation, as demonstrated by the low pain scores.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of sevoflurane, target-controlled infusion propofol, and propofol/isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery: a quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.
In a prospective randomized study in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we compared the hemodynamic effects, the quality of induction, and the quality of recovery from a hypnotic drug for the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, or propofol 1.5 microg/kg followed by isoflurane. All patients were premedicated with midazolam and received sufentanil 0.4 microg/kg at induction. The induction of anesthesia was associated with a decrease in arterial blood pressure in all groups, but this was least pronounced in the Sevoflurane group. ⋯ Similar doses of vasoactive drugs were used in all groups. The induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane was associated with inferior conditions for intubation in comparison with both Propofol groups, although the time to intubation was faster in the Sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The recovery characteristics were similar in the three groups.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of preoperative epidural morphine on postoperative analgesia in children.
We examined the effects of preoperative epidural morphine associated with general anesthesia on postoperative morphine requirements. Twenty-one children older than 6 yr scheduled for major surgery were randomly assigned to two groups, a control group and an epidural group that received a single epidural morphine injection.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntraoperative plateletpheresis and autologous platelet gel do not reduce chest tube drainage or allogeneic blood transfusion after reoperative coronary artery bypass graft.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is postulated to decrease postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD) and allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, recent metaanalysis of the literature reveals that few good quality (therapeutic yield) trials that show a benefit have been published. The potential hemodynamic instability caused by plateletpheresis has not been emphasized. ⋯ Fifty-three percent of the Pheresis group patients exhibited significant hemodynamic instability, versus 27% of the Control group (P < 0.05). This study was unable to show any reduction in MCTD or ABT, although the plateletpheresis technique may offset platelet dysfunction caused by aspirin or increased blood exposure to nonbiologic surfaces, or it may compensate for lack of antifibrinolytic use. The significantly increased incidence of hemodynamic instability in the Pheresis group means that the risk/benefit ratio must be determined for individual cardiac surgical units.