Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is less than after laparotomy, and patients may benefit from an intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetic. Thirty-seven ASA physical status I or II patients received in double-blinded fashion 20 mL of 0.9% saline solution (placebo), ropivacaine 0.25% (Rop 0.25%), or ropivacaine 0.75% (Rop 0.75%) immediately after trocar placement and at the end of surgery. We measured pain and morphine consumption until 20 h after surgery. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations were measured. The three groups were comparable for shoulder pain, parietal pain, and incidence of side effects. Visceral pain at rest, during cough, and on movement and total consumption of morphine were significantly smaller in Groups Rop 0.25% and Rop 0.75% when compared with Placebo. Although no adverse effect occurred in any patient, the largest dose led to large plasma concentrations of ropivacaine (2.93 +/- 2.46 microg/mL and 3.76 +/- 3.01 microg/mL after the first and second injection, respectively). We conclude that intraperitoneal administration of ropivacaine before and after surgery significantly decreases postoperative pain. Because the smaller dosage (2 x 50 mg) provided similar analgesia and was associated with significantly smaller plasma concentrations than the larger dosage (2 x 150 mg), this smaller dosage seems more appropriate. ⋯ Intraperitoneal ropivacaine 100 mg injected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly decreased postoperative pain when compared with injection of intraperitoneal placebo. At this dose, plasma concentrations remained in the nontoxic range,
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialCisapride does not prevent postoperative vomiting in children.
The peripherally acting prokinetic drug cisapride can overcome opioid-induced gastrointestinal paresis and may thereby eliminate a stimulus for postoperative vomiting. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of 96 children undergoing inguinal surgery to determine whether cisapride would reduce the incidence of postoperative vomiting after general anesthesia supplemented with morphine. Group C1 patients (n = 38) received cisapride 0.3 mg/kg orally 1 h before surgery and placebo 6 h later, Group C2 (n = 28) received cisapride both before and after surgery, and Group P (n = 30) received placebo. Mean age (5.0 +/- 2.7 yr) and weight (21.0 +/- 8.6 kg), median pain scores and parent satisfaction scores, and incidence of rescue analgesic administration were similar across groups. Contrary to our hypothesis, incidences of postoperative vomiting in the hospital (32% vs 20%, P = 0.33) and at home (53% vs 46%, P = 0.33) did not vary by treatment group (with [C1 and C2] and without [P] cisapride, respectively). There was a trend toward more severe postoperative vomiting (three or more episodes) in children who received cisapride versus those who did not, both in hospital (6% vs 0%, P = 0.3) and at home (22% vs 8%) (P = 0.13). We conclude that cisapride does not prevent postoperative vomiting in this patient population and speculate that factors other than reduced gastrointestinal motility associated with general anesthesia and opioids are more important determinants of postoperative vomiting. ⋯ Cisapride does not prevent postoperative vomiting in children and may increase its severity.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe efficacy of preemptive Milrinone or Amrinone therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Acute deterioration in ventricular function and oxygen transport is common after cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that milrinone or amrinone may reduce their occurrence and catecholamine requirements and increase cellular enzyme levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass. In 45 patients, we randomly administered milrinone 50 microg/kg plus 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion for 10 h, amrinone 1.5 mg/kg plus 10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion for 10 h, or placebo at release of aortic cross-clamp. Hemodynamic variables, dopamine requirement, and laboratory values were recorded. At the postoperative nadir, stroke volume index was higher in the Milrinone and Amrinone groups (mean +/- SD, 27.8 +/- 4.0 and 26.1 +/- 3.2 vs. 20.4 +/- 5.1 mL x min (-1) x m(-2) per beat, P < 0.0001), and oxygen transport index was higher (354.7 +/- 57.8 and 353.7 +/- 91.2 vs 283.0 +/- 83.9 mL. min(-1) x m(-2), P = 0.009). The postoperative dopamine requirement was less (6.6 +/- 2.7 and 6.8 +/- 2.6 vs 10.4 +/- 2.0 mg/kg, P < 0.008), and postoperative serum lactate, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine kinase, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels were less (P < 0.01). The mean postoperative heart rate was faster in the Milrinone group than in the Amrinone and Placebo groups (96.8 +/- 10.3 vs. 86.9 +/- 9.5 and 87.8 +/- 10.8 bpm, P < 0.01). Milrinone and amrinone administered preemptively reduce postoperative deterioration in cardiac function and oxygen transport, dopamine requirement, and increases in serum lactate, glucose, and enzyme levels, although milrinone may increase heart rate. ⋯ Preemptive milrinone or amrinone administration before separation from cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgical patients not only ameliorates postoperative deterioration in cardiac function and oxygen transport, but also reduces dopamine requirement and increases serum lactate, glucose, and cellular enzyme levels, although milrinone may increase heart rate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThermoregulatory response to intraoperative head-down tilt.
Thermoregulation interacts with cardiovascular regulation within the central nervous system. We therefore evaluated the effects of head-down tilt on intraoperative thermal and cardiovascular regulation. Thirty-two patients undergoing lower-abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to the 1) supine, 2) 15 degrees -20 degrees head-down tilt, 3) leg-up, or 4) combination of leg-up and head-down tilt position. Core temperature and forearm minus fingertip skin-temperature gradients (an index of peripheral vasoconstriction) were monitored for 3 h after the induction of combined general and lumbar epidural anesthesia. We also determined cardiac output and central-venous and esophageal pressures. Neither right atrial transmural pressure nor cardiac index was altered in the Head-Down Tilt group, but both increased significantly in the Leg-Up groups. The vasoconstriction threshold was reduced in both leg-up positions but was not significantly decreased by head-down tilt. Final core temperatures were 35.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C (mean +/- SEM) in the Supine group, 35.0 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the Head-Down Tilt group, 34.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the Leg-Up group (P < 0.05 compared with supine), and 34.3 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C when leg-up and head-down tilt were combined (P < 0.05 compared with supine). These results confirm that elevating the legs increases right atrial transmural pressure, reduces the vasoconstriction threshold, and aggravates intraoperative hypothermia. Surprisingly, maintaining a head-down tilt did not increase right atrial pressure. ⋯ Intraoperative hypothermia is exaggerated when patients are maintained in the leg-up position because the vasoconstriction threshold is reduced. However, head-down tilt (Trendelenburg position) does not reduce the vasoconstriction threshold or aggravate hypothermia. The head-down tilt position thus does not require special perioperative thermal precautions or management unless the leg-up position is used simultaneously.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRemifentanil provides hemodynamic stability and faster awakening time in transsphenoidal surgery.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the effects of remifentanil in ASA I-II patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. After the induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to the Isoflurane (n = 22, 60% nitrous oxide, isoflurane up to 2% end-tidal) or Remifentanil group (n = 21, 60% nitrous oxide, 0.5% end-tidal isoflurane, remifentanil up to 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). If mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased >80 mm Hg during maximal dosage of isoflurane or remifentanil, labetalol was administered. At the end of anesthesia, extubation and awakening times, respiratory rate, SpO(2), MAP, heart rate, and adverse effects were recorded. Hemodynamics and bleeding (minimal, mild, moderate, severe) were not different between groups. Bleeding grade increased with MAP >80 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Labetalol was administered to 20 patients in the Isoflurane group, and 10 patients in the Remifentanil group (P < 0.01). The dose of labetalol was larger in the Isoflurane group (1.0 +/- 0.6 versus 0.5 +/- 0.7 mg/kg, P < 0.05). Time to extubation did not differ, whereas time to follow commands was shorter in Remifentanil patients (16 +/- 8 versus 10 +/- 2 min, P < 0.01). No adverse effects occurred in the early postoperative period. ⋯ In patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery, balanced anesthesia with remifentanil (0.22 +/- 0.17 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) provides faster awakening time, as compared with large-dose volatile-based anesthesia, without the risk of postoperative opioid respiratory depression.