Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Case Reports Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialFast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures.
Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of geriatric patients (>65 yr) bypassing the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after ambulatory surgery. A secondary objective was to compare recovery profiles when using three different maintenance anesthetics. Ninety ASA physical status I--III consenting outpatients (>65 yr) undergoing short urologic procedures were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic treatment groups. After a standardized induction with fentanyl and propofol, anesthesia was maintained with propofol (75-150 microg center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1) IV), isoflurane (0.7%-1.2% end tidal), or desflurane (3%-6% end tidal), in combination with nitrous oxide 70% in oxygen. In all three groups, the primary anesthetic was titrated to maintain an electroencephalographic-bispectral index value of 60-65. Recovery times, postanesthesia recovery scores, and therapeutic interventions in the PACU were recorded. Although emergence times were similar in the three groups, the time to achieve a fast-track discharge score of 14 was significantly shorter in patients receiving desflurane compared with propofol and isoflurane (22 +/- 23 vs 33 +/- 25 and 44 +/- 36 min, respectively). On arrival in the PACU, a significantly larger percentage of patients receiving desflurane were judged to be fast-track eligible compared with those receiving either isoflurane and propofol (73% vs 43% and 44%, respectively). The number of therapeutic interventions in the PACU was also significantly larger in the Isoflurane group when compared with the Propofol and Desflurane groups (21 vs 11 and 7, respectively). In conclusion, use of desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia should facilitate PACU bypass ("fast-tracking") of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic procedures. ⋯ Geriatric outpatients undergoing brief urologic procedures more rapidly achieve fast-tracking discharge criteria after desflurane (versus isoflurane and propofol) anesthesia. Use of isoflurane was also associated with an increased need for nursing interventions in the early recovery period compared with desflurane and propofol.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe prophylactic effect of tropisetron on epidural morphine-related nausea and vomiting: a comparison of dexamethasone with saline.
Tropisetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 receptor antagonist that is primarily used in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We evaluated the prophylactic effect of tropisetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone and saline served as controls. One-hundred twenty women (n = 40 in each of three groups) undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study. At the end of surgery, Group 1 received IV tropisetron 5 mg, whereas Groups 2 and 3 received dexamethasone 5 mg and saline, respectively. We found that tropisetron did not significantly reduce the occurrence of nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone, however, reduced the total incidence of nausea and vomiting from 59% to 21% (P < 0.01) and the percentage of patients requiring rescue antiemetic from 38% to 13% (P < 0.05). We conclude that IV tropisetron 5 mg did not prevent the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with epidural morphine. IV dexamethasone 5 mg was effective for this purpose. ⋯ We compared the prophylactic IV administration of tropisetron 5 mg to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with epidural morphine with dexamethasone 5 mg and saline in women undergoing hysterectomy. We found that tropisetron 5 mg did not significantly reduce the occurrence of PONV associated with epidural morphine. Dexamethasone 5 mg was effective for this purpose.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPreoperative clonidine blunts hyperadrenergic and hyperdynamic responses to prolonged tourniquet pressure during general anesthesia.
Although the mechanism of tourniquet-induced hypertension is still unclear, plasma norepinephrine concentrations continuously increase in parallel to arterial blood pressure during tourniquet inflation. Clonidine attenuates hyperadrenergic and hyperdynamic responses. We investigated the effects of clonidine on prolonged tourniquet inflation. Twenty-nine patients scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive IV clonidine (3 microg/kg; n = 14) or placebo (n = 15) before tourniquet inflation of the lower limbs under general anesthesia in a double-blinded manner. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, epinephrine, and norepinephrine plasma concentrations were measured before tourniquet inflation, 60 min after tourniquet inflation, just before tourniquet deflation, and 20 min after tourniquet deflation. Mean arterial blood pressure and norepinephrine plasma-concentrations were significantly lower in the Clonidine group compared with Control after 60 min tourniquet inflation (P = 0.016; P = 0.006). Immediately before deflation of the tourniquet, the difference for mean arterial pressure between groups was even more pronounced (P = 0.005). Twenty minutes after deflation mean arterial blood pressure in the Control group was still increased and significantly higher compared with the Clonidine group (P = 0.002). In conclusion, preoperative IV clonidine blunts hyperadrenergic and hyperdynamic responses resulting from prolonged tourniquet inflation under general anesthesia in ASA class I--II patients. ⋯ Tourniquet inflation is associated with a continuous increase in arterial blood pressure and sympathetic outflow. This study shows that IV clonidine effectively blunts increases of both arterial blood pressure and plasma norepinephrine concentrations.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe primary action of epidural fentanyl after cesarean delivery is via a spinal mechanism.
We tested the hypotheses that the primary mechanism of action of epidural fentanyl after cesarean delivery is spinal and that very small dose epidural bupivacaine with epinephrine enhances this effect. After elective cesarean delivery, 100 parturients were randomized in a double-blinded design to four groups. Group I and II patients received a continuous 12 mL/h epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.015% with epinephrine 1 microg/mL for 48 h and Groups III and IV received a 12 mL/h saline epidural infusion instead. Fentanyl 20 microg/mL was administered via a patient-controlled analgesia device either into the epidural infusion (Groups I and IV) or IV (Groups II and III). When compared to patients receiving epidural fentanyl, those receiving IV fentanyl required larger mean infused and total dose of fentanyl (P < 0.0001), reported more pain (P < 0.001), and had a more frequent incidence of excessive sedation (P < 0.01), nausea (P < 0.01), and vomiting (P < 0.01). Plasma concentrations of fentanyl were larger for Group II and III than for Groups I and IV (P < 0.001) at 24 and 48 h. Our results support the hypothesis that the primary mechanism of analgesia of epidural fentanyl after cesarean delivery is spinal. Our data also show that the total required dose of epidural, but not IV, fentanyl is reduced by very small dose epidural bupivacaine and epinephrine (Group I versus Group IV, P < 0.02 and Group II vs Group III, not significant). ⋯ Fentanyl administered epidurally to parturients after cesarean delivery has a primarily spinal mechanism of action and this effect is enhanced by very small dose epidural bupivacaine and epinephrine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSelective spinal anesthesia versus desflurane anesthesia in short duration outpatient gynecological laparoscopy: a pharmacoeconomic comparison.
We compared the cost and effectiveness of selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) with a desflurane-based general anesthetic (DES) for outpatient gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective analysis was undertaken of 10 patients randomized to receive SSA and compared with 10 patients randomized to receive DES. The groups were well matched in their demographic characteristics. The mean cost (in 2000 Canadian dollar values) of anesthesia supplies, drugs, and nursing for the SSA group of $62.31 was less than that for the DES group of $92.31 (P < 0.01). Recovery costs of both groups were similar. Time to administer anesthesia and time spent in the postanesthetic care unit were also similar. Postoperative analgesia was required by 50% of the DES group but in no patient receiving SSA (P < 0.01). SSA is a cost-effective alternative to DES in these patients. ⋯ Small-dose spinal anesthesia is an effective alternative to a desflurane general anesthetic in terms of cost and recovery profiles in ambulatory gynecological laparoscopy.