Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2002
Meta AnalysisThe efficacy and safety of transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review.
The role of scopolamine administered via transdermal therapeutic systems in the prevention of postoperative vomiting, nausea, and nausea and vomiting is unclear. We performed a systematic search for full reports of randomized comparisons of transdermal scopolamine with inactive control. Dichotomous data were extracted. In the meta-analysis, relative risks and numbers-needed-to-treat/harm were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In 23 trials, 979 patients received transdermal scopolamine, and 984 patients received placebo. Sensitivity analyses were performed using restricted data for truncated control event rates (40%-80%) and for large trials. With these data, the relative risks for postoperative vomiting (five reports), nausea (five reports), nausea and vomiting (eight reports), and rescue treatment (three reports) were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54-0.87), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.88), and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.85), respectively. This means that of 100 patients who receive transdermal scopolamine, approximately 17 will not experience postoperative vomiting who would have done so had they all received a placebo. However, 18 of 100 patients will have visual disturbances, eight will report dry mouth, two will report dizziness, one will be classified as being agitated, and 1-13 patients who are prescribed transdermal scopolamine will not use it correctly. The timing of application does not alter efficacy. ⋯ Of 100 patients who receive transdermal scopolamine, approximately 17 will not vomit in the postoperative period who would have done so had they all received a placebo. However, 18 of 100 patients will have visual disturbances, and eight will report dry mouth. Incorrect use further limits its efficacy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSmall-dose dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of tropisetron with saline.
Dexamethasone is an effective antiemetic drug, but the efficacy of small-dose dexamethasone 5 mg on the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been evaluated. We, therefore, evaluated the prophylactic effect of small-dose dexamethasone (5 mg) on PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Tropisetron and saline served as controls. One-hundred-twenty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. At the induction of anesthesia, the Dexamethasone group received IV dexamethasone 5 mg, the Tropisetron group received IV tropisetron 2 mg, and the Placebo group received IV saline. We found that both dexamethasone and tropisetron significantly decreased the following variables: the total incidence of PONV (P < 0.01), more than four vomiting episodes (P < 0.05), and the proportions of patients requiring rescue antiemetics (P < 0.05). The differences between the Dexamethasone and Tropisetron groups were not significant. We conclude that prophylactic IV dexamethasone 5 mg significantly reduces the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At this dose, dexamethasone is as effective as tropisetron 2 mg and is more effective than placebo. ⋯ We evaluated the prophylactic effect of small-dose dexamethasone (5 mg) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Tropisetron (2 mg) and saline served as controls. We found that dexamethasone 5 mg (IV) significantly reduced the incidence of PONV in these patients, and, at this dose, dexamethasone was as effective as tropisetron and was more effective than placebo.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2002
Review Comparative StudyThe analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hysterectomy.
The objective of our study was to see if incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine with epinephrine produces analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Forty-six ASA physical status I and II patients received a standardized anesthetic, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine, and rectal paracetamol 1 g every 6 h. Patients were randomized to receive 50 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 microg/mL or 50 mL of normal saline. Thirty milliliters and 20 mL of treatment solution were administered into the peritoneum and incision, respectively, before wound closure. Seventeen and 16 patients in the Placebo and Bupivacaine groups, respectively, completed the study. The reasons for withdrawal were PCA malfunction, PCA discontinued too early, nausea, chest infection, intraabdominal drain insertion, and protocol violation. There were no significant differences between the Bupivacaine and Placebo groups in age, height, weight, or duration of surgery. Pain on movement was significantly more intense in the Placebo group than in the Bupivacaine group on awakening. Morphine consumption (interquartile range) over 24 h was 62 mg (53-85 mg) in the Placebo group compared with 44 mg (33-56 mg) in the Bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). This significant difference was attributable to the larger morphine consumption in the Placebo group in the first 4 postoperative h. We conclude that a combination of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine provides significant morphine-sparing analgesia for 4 h after total abdominal hysterectomy. ⋯ A combination of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine may be recommended because it provides significant morphine-sparing analgesia for 4 h after total abdominal hysterectomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2002
Comparative Study Clinical TrialLevobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: a pharmacokinetic and clinical comparison in patients with normal renal function or renal disease.
We compared the pharmacokinetics and clinical characteristics of 0.5% levobupivacaine for axillary block in patients with normal renal function versus patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Twenty patients with normal renal function and eight patients with ESRD received an axillary block with 50-60 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine. Patients were evaluated for onset and duration of sensory/motor block. Eleven patients with normal renal function and eight patients with ESRD underwent pharmacokinetic analysis. No differences between groups were found in the onset, duration, or quality of block. The median time to sensory block was 12.5 min and 12.9 min, and mean duration of the block was 19 h and 22 h in normal versus ESRD patients, respectively. No significant differences in noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables (median) were found between normal and ESRD patients with an AUC(0-t) (microg. h(-1). mL(-1)) of 11 and 13, peak concentration (C(max)) (microg/mL) of 1.2 and 1.6, and a time to peak concentration (T(max)) (min) of 55 and 48, respectively. This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy and equivalence of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of 0.5% levobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block in patients with ESRD and normal renal function. ⋯ This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy and equivalence of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of 0.5% levobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block in patients with renal disease and normal renal function.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2002
Case ReportsThe use of the intubating laryngeal mask endotracheal tube with intubating devices.
Despite adequate visualization of the vocal cords using specialized airway devices, anatomical factors and the physical characteristics of the tube may cause difficulty when performing endotracheal intubation. The endotracheal tube designed for use with the intubating laryngeal mask airway may facilitate intubation in these circumstances.