Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPrehospital analgesia with acupressure in victims of minor trauma: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.
Untreated pain during the transportation of patients after minor trauma is a common problem in emergency medicine. Because paramedics usually are not allowed to perform invasive procedures or to give drugs for pain treatment, a noninvasive, nondrug-based method would be helpful. Acupressure is a traditional Chinese treatment for pain that is based on pain relief followed by a short mechanical stimulation of specific points. Consequently, we tested the hypothesis that effective pain therapy is possible by paramedics who are trained in acupressure. In a double-blinded trial we included 60 trauma patients. We randomly assigned them into three groups ("true points," "sham-points," and "no acupressure"). An independent observer, blinded to the treatment assignment, recorded vital variables and visual analog scales for pain and anxiety before and after treatment. At the end of transport, we asked for ratings of overall satisfaction. For statistical evaluation, one-way analysis of variance and the Scheffé F test were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Morphometric and demographic data and potential confounding factors such as age, sex, pain, anxiety, blood pressure, and heart rate before treatment did not differ among the groups. At the end of transport we found significantly less pain, anxiety, and heart rate and a greater satisfaction in the "true points" groups (P < 0.01). Our results show that acupressure is an effective and simple-to-learn treatment of pain in emergency trauma care and leads to an improvement of the quality of care in emergency transport. We suggest that this technique is easy to learn and risk free and may improve paramedic-based rescue systems. ⋯ We tested, in a double-blinded manner, the hypothesis that acupressure could be an effective pain therapy in minor-trauma patients. Our results show that acupressure is an effective and simple-to-learn treatment of pain in emergency medical care and can improve the quality of care.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic IM small-dose phenylephrine blunts spinal anesthesia-induced hypotensive response during surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly.
In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic IM phenylephrine at doses of 1.5 and 3 mg on hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in 90 normotensive and hypertensive patients aged >65 yr undergoing surgery for hip fracture. Thirty normotensive patients received 1.5 or 3 mg of phenylephrine IM (N/P-1.5 and N/P-3.0 groups; n = 15 in each), whereas controls received saline (N/C group; n = 15), and 45 hypertensive patients were treated in a similar manner (H/P-1.5, H/P-3.0, and H/C groups; n = 15 in each). All groups had a peak sensory block height of T9, with a range of T8 to T10. The incidence of hypotension (>25% decrease in mean arterial blood pressure [MAP] from baseline) was significantly lower in the patients who received phenylephrine 1.5 or 3 mg than in the controls, both in the normotensive and hypertensive groups (P < 0.01). The N/P-3.0 and N/P-1.5 groups and the H/P-3.0 group had significantly lower percentage reductions in MAP (P < 0.05) and required significantly smaller doses of rescue IV ephedrine (P < 0.05) than did the N/C group or the H/C group. The H/P-1.5 group also required significantly less rescue IV ephedrine (P < 0.05), although it was not sufficient to significantly attenuate the percentage decrease in MAP compared with that in the H/C group. Bradycardia (heart rate <50 bpm) as an adverse effect after IM administration of phenylephrine was not observed in any of the groups. Hypertension (MAP >20% increase from baseline) after medication occurred in the N/P-3.0 and H/P-3.0 groups, but not in the N/P-1.5 and H/P-1.5 groups. We conclude that prophylactic IM injection of 1.5 mg of phenylephrine is a safe (defined as the inhibition of bradycardia and hypertension) and effective means of reducing the incidence of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia in normotensive and hypertensive elderly patients. ⋯ We evaluated the efficacy and safety of small-dose IM phenylephrine for prophylaxis against spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in normotensive and hypertensive elderly patients. Phenylephrine 1.5 mg IM was effective for reducing the incidence of hypotension and avoided adverse effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialBispectral index in patients with target-controlled or manually-controlled infusion of propofol.
In this prospective, randomized study we compared bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, time to extubation, and the costs of target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manually-controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol. Forty patients undergoing first-time implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator were included. Anesthesia was performed with remifentanil (0.2-0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1)) and propofol. Propofol was used as TCI (plasma target concentration, 2.5-3.5 micro g/mL; n = 20) or MCI (3.0-4.0 mg. kg(-1). h(-1); n = 20). BIS, heart rate, and arterial blood pressure were measured at six data points: T1, before anesthesia; T2, after intubation; T3, after skin incision; T4, after first defibrillation; T5, after third defibrillation; and T6, after extubation. There were no significant hemodynamic differences between the two groups. BIS was significantly lower at T3 and T4 in the TCI group than in the MCI group. The mean dose of propofol was larger in TCI patients (5.8 +/- 1.4 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) than in the MCI patients (3.7 +/- 0.6 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) (P < 0.05), whereas doses of remifentanil did not differ. Time to extubation did not differ between the two groups (TCI, 13.7 +/- 5.3 min; MCI, 12.3 +/- 3.5 min). One patient in the MCI group had signs of intraoperative awareness without explicit memory after first defibrillation (BIS before shock, 49; after shock, 83). Costs were significantly less in the MCI group (34.83 US dollars) than in the TCI group (39.73 US dollars). BIS failed to predict the adequacy of anesthesia for the next painful stimulus. ⋯ In this prospective, randomized study, bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, time to extubation, and costs of target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manually-controlled infusion of propofol were compared. TCI increased the amount of propofol used. BIS failed to predict the adequacy of anesthesia for the next painful stimulus.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol.
Magnesium sulfate, 2.48 mmol, injected 20 s before the administration of propofol significantly reduced the incidence of pain caused by a propofol injection and may be useful in minimizing this common side effect.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 2002
Clinical TrialPain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery.
Pain complicates the recovery process after ambulatory surgery. We surveyed 175 ambulatory surgery patients to determine pain severity, analgesic use, relationship of pain to duration of recovery, and the relative importance of various factors to predicting these outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine unique contributions of predictor variables to outcome. Surgical procedures included knee arthroscopy (n = 50), hernia surgery (n = 25), pelvic laparoscopy (n = 25), transvaginal uterine surgery (n = 25), surgery for breast disease (n = 25), and plastic surgery (n = 25). Maximum pain (on a scale of 0-10) varied from 2.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.1 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SE), depending on surgical procedure; 24% of patients had pain scores of > or =7, and 24% were delayed in Phase 1 recovery by pain. Pain scores were lower if local anesthetic or ketorolac was administered intraoperatively (22% and 26% respectively). Fentanyl dose during recovery correlated with maximum pain scores; fentanyl dose was 42% less if ketorolac was administered intraoperatively. In females, the recovery fentanyl dose increased in proportion to the intraoperative fentanyl dose. The maximum pain score was predictive of total recovery time (135, 172, and 212 min of recovery for maximum pain scores of 0-3, 4-6, and 7-10, respectively; P < 0.001). We conclude that improvements in pain therapy are warranted to improve patient comfort and to expedite recovery. ⋯ Moderate to severe pain is common after ambulatory surgery and is a frequent cause of delayed discharge. Postoperative pain, opioid-related side effects, and time to discharge were less when nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or local anesthetics were used intraoperatively to prevent pain before patient awakening.